Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard

Update this page

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

---

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

---

Definition of edit warring

Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Click here to create a new report

User:59.102.9.103 reported by User:Nkon21 (Result: Semiprotection)

Page: On the Ground (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 59.102.9.103 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. Consecutive edits made from 10:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC) to 10:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
   1. 10:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Credits and personnel */"
   2. 10:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC) ""
2. 04:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Credits and personnel */"
3. 21:16, 18 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Credits and personnel */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

IP hopper has a long history of slow motion edit warring and persistently re-adding the same changes against the status quo.

• Exhibit 1: On the Ground, multiple edits re-adding the same changes in the span of the past few days
• Exhibit 2: On Kill This Love (song), Solo (Jennie song), and Ddu-Du Ddu-Du - persistently asserting that Solo is a Blackpink song across multiple IPs by adding the chronology to other Blackpink songs on "Solo" even when multiple editors have stated the it is explicitly not.
• Exihibit 3: On Cho Mi-yeon, persistently re-adding the same unsourced information across multiple IPs despite getting reverted every single time.

Dealing with this user is simply a pain in the ass. They leave zero edit summaries, zero replies to warnings, and basically completely zero regard for any community collaboration or policies. They have had the same slow motion edit warring behavior since last June. List of most IPs are documented at User:Nkon21/sandbox3. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 17:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

• Result: Your list of IPs at User:Nkon21/sandbox3 indicates that no rangeblock is possible, so I have semiprotected five articles . EdJohnston (talk) 15:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Rodriguez.AlvaresMex reported by User:NMW03 (Result: Blocked)

Page: List of equipment of the Azerbaijani Land Forces (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Rodriguez.AlvaresMex (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 18:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC) "I am added reliable source that proving informations regarding to light strike vehicles, NMW03 you don't have any business in this page, i suggest you go to armenian military equipment page and edit those infos. If you repeat destroy that page, your account will be deleted"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 10:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC) on Talk:List of equipment of the Azerbaijani Land Forces "/* Unreliable sources */ new section"

Comments:

Reverting edits without reason and claiming that I revert their edits because I am "armenian". Then suggests me to edit Armenian military pages. NMW03 (talk) 20:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked – 48 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 15:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Dippiljemmy reported by User:David.moreno72 (Result: )

Page: Palm Cove, Queensland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and George Elphinstone Dalrymple (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Dippiljemmy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 10:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1013567800 by David.moreno72 (talk)this is not an edit-war. I am reverting vandalism that promotes an ideological fiction without necessary context and which has contributed to genocidal actions."
2. 09:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1013566205 by David.moreno72 (talk)undoing edit that deleted an outstanding reference. Vandalism, especially that which promotes the cannibalism tropes of colonial times without explanation, deserves rapid reversal and reporting."
3. 08:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1013399740 by David.moreno72 (talk) I don't make any spurious claims, just added a secondary source that talks specifically of how colonists of northern Queensland dehumanised the local Aboriginal population through tropes of cannibalism. The reference talks specifically of Dalrymple and Elphinstone throughout the book."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 09:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."
2. 09:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Using inaccurate or inappropriate edit summaries on George Elphinstone Dalrymple."
3. 10:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:George_Elphinstone_Dalrymple

Comments:

Unable to rationally discuss. I have tried to rationally discuss edits on dozens of occasions, but the editor continually refuses to engage and discuss to reach a consensus. They are now into fringe theories that the journal entries of George Elphinstone Dalrymple, a distinguished and famous Australian explorer (and the quoting of them on his Wikipedia article) that describes his observations of cannibalism among Indigenous Australians in the 19th century is an "ideological fiction without necessary context and which has contributed to genocidal actions". I have requested quotes from reliable references that directly expostulate the observations of Dalrymple, but has repeatedly refused to do so. Clearly WP:NOTHERE - Little or no interest in working collaboratively David.moreno72 10:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

• Comment I don't know what's been going on between these two editors, certainly David.moreno72 has left an awful lot of warnings on Dippiljemmy's talk page, perhaps Dippiljemmy has been doing the wrong thing or perhaps this is a case of HARASSMENT on David.moreno72's behalf, I honestly don't know, I can't be bothered going through it all. I just wanted to say that this claim that Dippiljemmy is NOTHERE is demonstrably false - whenever I've come across Dippiljemmy they've been making excellent editions with high quality reliable sources, they appear to have a level of expertise in QLD colonial history and I have only noticed their contributions due to their high quality, in my experience with this editor they're a good contributor, a productive and constructive editor, so I do question this claim that they are NOTHERE. Bacondrum 19:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Just looking at this content dispute, neither party has taken it to talk. Dippiljemmy's addition is a reliable secondary source and his addition reflects this source. It is well known that colonialists fabricated tales of cannibalism in Australia, so a secondary scholarly source giving context to the primary source that makes claims that have, by and large, been discredited today is clearly warranted. Bacondrum 19:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Ajf773 reported by User:122.57.52.21 (Result: Filer warned)

Page: State Highway 32 (New Zealand) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Ajf773 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=State_Highway_32_(New_Zealand)&oldid=1013291801

Diffs of the user's reverts: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=State_Highway_32_(New_Zealand)&oldid=1013371377

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=State_Highway_32_(New_Zealand)&oldid=1013553744

Future revert

Future revert

etc

etc

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ajf773#Edit_warring_notice

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:State_Highway_32_(New_Zealand)

Comments:

Account does not intend to seek consensus and refuses to acknowledge sources. Clear WP:NOTHERE 122.57.52.21 (talk) 10:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

• Result: The filing IP is warned they may be blocked if they revert the article again without getting a prior consensus on the talk page for their change. And read WP:INDISCRIMINATE for why Wikipedia doesn't include every small detail about everything it chooses to cover. EdJohnston (talk) 18:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Pretty ironic that you'd say that i need to reach a consensus but the user i'm allegedly fighting with agrees with my edits about google maps not being a reliable source. Going to backtrack now hun? 122.57.52.21 (talk) 08:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Wikisuperman007 reported by User:Austronesier (Result: Blocked)

Page: Punjabi dialects and languages (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Wikisuperman007 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 14:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1013599597 by Austronesier (talk) Stop deleting the dialects of Punjabi. This is the same content this page had before."
2. 13:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1013586721 by Uanfala (talk) Please do not remove the dialects. Having a lot of text should be a problem as long as it is correct. So please again, do not remove all the dialects unless you hate Punjabi language like those fake Seraikis."
3. 09:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1013561901 by Ahmetlii (talk) Please do not remove the dialects. Seraiki and Hindko are dialects so they cannot be added as Ethnicity."
4. 01:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1013401790 by Uanfala (talk) Please stop removing the dialects. What is your problem?"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 14:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Punjabi dialects and languages."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

The user also has reverted a bold edit in Punjabi languages, but so far failed to discuss in Talk:Punjabi language#Dialects, where the rationale of the trimming of both articles is explained. Austronesier (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

@Uanfala: –Austronesier (talk) 14:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikisuperman007 I simply restored the text that has been deleted for no reason by Saraiki supporters who are hell bent on destroying Punjabi language.

I had to restore the text again and again because the restored text was being removed because "There was a lot of text". What kind of excuse is this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Punjabi_language#Dialects_section Uanfala "The dialects section is a shoddy collage of the texts of the individual dialect articles – it has excessive details that are out of place here". What kind of argument is this?

All the dialects have been backed by credible sources. If there is a lot of text then you should look for incorrect text and only remove that part. Uanfala decided to basically get rid of all the content about dialects. Is this completely irresponsible behavior to delete all information about a language dialects because there is a lot of text?

Uanfala should be banned for this misconduct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisuperman007 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Sir Austronesier, I can tell you why you might see users like Uanfala who will try to delete the Punjabi dialects in the future as well. Provinces in Pakistan are made on language and Ethnicity. Multani which has been regarded as a dialect of Punjabi started to develop into language around 1960 with the aim of carving out a Saraiki province.

These Saraiki nationalist do not any dialect on the Punjabi dialects page because dialects page will also talk about the Multani dialect which these Saraiki nationalist are trying to develop into language.

"The dialects section is a shoddy collage of the texts of the individual dialect articles – it has excessive details that are out of place here", this is just an excuse to not have any Punjabi dialects on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisuperman007 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours EvergreenFir (talk) 17:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

User:51.37.228.25 reported by User:Bastun (Result: Blocked)

Page: John McGuirk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 51.37.228.25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 13:09, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "To correct disinformation"
2. 12:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "To correct disinformation"
3. 12:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "To Correct disinformation"
4. 12:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Correction of disinformation"
5. 12:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Update disinformation"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 12:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "General note: Removal of content, blanking on John McGuirk."
2. 12:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Final warning: Removal of content, blanking on John McGuirk."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 12:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Gript 'right-wing' */ new section"

Comments:

• Blocked – 72 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 00:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Mr.Animato reported by User:EDG 543 (Result: Blocked)

Page: Multiverse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Mr.Animato (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 20:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Fixed"
2. 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "I just a small update for multiverse page."
3. 20:13, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Fixed"
4. 20:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Fixed (again)"
5. 20:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Fixed"
6. 19:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Fixed"
7. 19:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Fixed"
8. 18:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Fixed (again)"
9. 18:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "Fixed"
10. 17:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Brief explanation */A little update."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 20:20, 22 March 2021 (UTC) "warning"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Multiverse#The_"etc"_edit added after this had passed something like 15RR by Meters (talk) 21:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments:

insists on adding just a simple "etc." to pending changes protected article. A short ban is in order, I believe, unless the 3RR is different on pending-changes articles... Thanks, EDG 543 ^{(message me)} 20:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

• I point to edits made on User talk:Mr.Animato after this report was filed: the user appears to be engaging in a deliberate WP:IDIDNTHEARYOU campaign. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
• Just an update: we are up to 13 of the same edits. Thanks, EDG 543 ^{(message me)} 21:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
  • (ec)Another revert at the same time as this report [1], and two more reverts since having been informed of this 3RR thread. [2] [3] Meters (talk) 21:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
    • And still going. Started a talk page thread and directed editor to comment there. Meters (talk) 21:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
      • Mr.Animato appears to have had enough and has requested to "delete his account". I would point out that, based on his talk page edits, English is not his native tongue. I would grant him his WP:VANISH wish and call it a day. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:54, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

• Blocked – 48 hours. Vanishing is for editors in good standing. A person with only 26 edits whose account was just created today could just stop editing. EdJohnston (talk) 22:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Eiskrahablo reported by User:Chipmunkdavis (Result: Indef)

User being reported: Eiskrahablo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), (formerly Xxxhrxxx)

Page: See below:

Diffs of the user's reverts: Page: Ayam goreng (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

1. [4] "Summarized the information" (initial edit, not a revert)
2. [5] "Undid revision 1012204615 by Davidelit (talk) Reverted to the stable version" (revert back to their edit above, marked as minor)
3. [6] "Undid revision 1012250732 by Haleth (talk)" (marked as minor)

Page: Ikan bakar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

1. [7] "Fixed content" (not a revert)
2. [8] "Undid revision 1012107962 by Austronesier (talk) Malaysian already included in Malay World countries." (revert to above, marked as minor)

Page: Ikan goreng (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

1. [9] "Fixed content." (not a revert)
2. [10] "Undid revision 1012108071 by Austronesier (talk) Malaysia already included as part of Malay World countries." (revert to above, marked as minor)

Page: Satay (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

1. [11] "Fixed content" (not a revert)
2. [12] "Undid revision 1012203943 by Davidelit (talk) Reverting back to the stable version." (revert to above, marked as minor)

Page: Greater Indonesia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

1. [13] "Undid vandalism 1010807821 by Chipmunkdavis (talk)" (a revert of my partial rv, marked as minor)
2. [14] "Undid vandalism 1013748072 by Chipmunkdavis (talk) Wikipedia:Vandalism. Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. WP:POINTy" (marked as minor)

Page: Languages of Brunei (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

1. [15] "Added citation sources." (an edit which included a revert of my partial rv, marked as minor)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: previous block notice

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:
Eiskrahablo seems to have come off a previous block, implemented following Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive428#User:Xxxhrxxx reported by User:Austronesier (Result: blocked one week. Please note name change to User:Eiskrahablo) User:MrCatttt is also blocked 1 week., and begun edit warring again, across multiple pages, with the same issues. (I was not involved in the last report, having found it now, and am only involved in the last two articles listed above.) Erroneous references to "stable versions" and hiding reverts as minor are further issues. Given the history, that the user has almost no edits to talk pages, and that I have been accused of vandalism twice, I have brought this here rather than try and bring up separate talkpage discussions on various article talk pages. CMD (talk) 10:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

@Chipmunkdavis:This report is ridiculous because I did not violates the the three revert rules as I am accused right now, and bringing the past reports to make it seems like "a lot" doesn't justify this report anyway, the prior disputes already been solved, and as you can see that I always gave my summary edits in the history edit page in Greater Indonesia and Languages of Brunei. If you feel like I did the overlinking in those articles, then why don't you just trying to perform any kind of discussion on the articles talk page or even trying to reduce "the overlink" by yourself? In fact, I noticed that you are the one who violates the Wikipedia policies and guidelines, and perform the vandalism acts:

Greater Indonesia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

1. [16] Rv unexplained change (This is Unexplained changes, add some uneducational words like "puppet" and did not cite any kind of citation sources.)

Languages of Brunei (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

1. [17] Rv severe wp:overlinking and the grammar isn't as good (And here I was accused overlinking and my grammar is not good, but User:Chipmunkdavis did not shows any kind of good faith effort to help fix the grammar, and he/she/they disrupt or damage the article instead by removing some information that already been verified.)

–Eiskrahablo (talk) 13:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Eiskrahablo removed most of the diffs in this report here, I have now restored them. CMD (talk) 16:31, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

• Blocked – Indefinite, for long-term disruptive editing. They removed others' diffs from a complaint about them at this noticeboard. See their block log for the background. Last block was by User:Deepfriedokra for one week. It was their third block, and that was earlier in March. The chance that this editor is willing to contribute normally to Wikipedia seems very low, so I've blocked indefinitely. Any admin who becomes convinced that this editor will follow policy in the future can lift the block. EdJohnston (talk) 18:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

User:106.101.128.253 reported by User:Ashleyyoursmile (Result: 48 hours)

Page: People Power Party (South Korea) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 106.101.128.253 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 10:40, 23 March 2021 (UTC) ""
2. 10:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC) ""
3. 10:22, 23 March 2021 (UTC) ""
4. Consecutive edits made from 10:17, 23 March 2021 (UTC) to 10:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
   1. 10:17, 23 March 2021 (UTC) ""
   2. 10:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC) ""
5. Consecutive edits made from 10:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC) to 10:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
   1. 10:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC) ""
   2. 10:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 10:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC) "Caution: Removal of content blanking (RW 16.1)"
2. 10:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC) "Final Warning: Removal of content blanking (RW 16.1)"
3. 10:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on People Power Party (South Korea)."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Disruptive editing, ignoring the hidden note clearly mentioning to discuss on talk page before making changes to the "position" of the party, has violated 3RR. Ashleyyoursmile! 10:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

I've blocked the IP for 48 hours for disruptive editing. PhilKnight (talk) 11:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

User:LeticiaLL and User:PlanespotterA320 reported by User:Thewolfchild (Result: )

Page: List of political self-immolations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Users being reported: PlanespotterA320 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and LeticiaLL (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [18]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [19] LLL (@ 2021-03-23T10:40:19‎)
2. [20] PA320
3. [21] LLL
4. [22] PA320
5. [23] LLL
6. [24] PA320
7. [25] LLL
8. [26] PA320 (@ 2021-03-22T19:15:29)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

[27] - warning on LLL talk page for another EW dispute 3 months ago

[28] - warning on PA320 talk page for another EW dispute 4 days ago

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: (link) (non-fruitful)

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on PA320 talk page: (link) (non-fruitful)

Diff of ANEW notification to PA320 talk page: [29] Diff of ANEW notification to LLL talk page: [30]

Comments:
I am not a party to this dispute. Both parties has violated 4RR and show no indication of stopping or willing to discuss and work towards a resolution. The subject matter is highly charged and language used does not lend to any hope of calmer and cooperative discourse. Both parties have recently been involved in other edit warring disputes and still have the warnings on their talk pages, as such they are both fully aware of the EW policy and still proceeded to edit war past the bright line anyway. - wolf 17:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

• I warned PlanespotterA320 about edit warring on the 19th[31] their response was to deny that they could possible have been edit warring [32] and then go radio silent. They don’t appear to have learned anything from my warning or explanation. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

PlanespotterA320 has reverted edits which removed sourced content and argued someone is a terrorist, which is probably not according to WP:TERRORIST and other edits which argued someone died in an accident during the Kurdish Newroz festivities which maybe not according to the recent Ruling of the ArbCom Case on Kurds and Kurdistan. I have notified them about the ruling, but this was after the Edit Warring by LetiziaLL. PlanespotterA320 might have thought, he reverted vandalism, which is not seen as edit warring.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

LeticiaLL is certainly not an innocent party here and should be sanctioned... But things like "Now, get off my talkpage and stop pushing your cheap Turkish propaganda.”[33] aren’t helping PlanespotterA320’s case. If they really thought this was vandalism there are better ways to handle that... They handled it like a content dispute even if they invoked vandalism concerns once or twice. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

LeticiaLL's edit history is a huge red flag. Instead of keeping the discussion on the talkpage, he took it to my userpage as well, I have right to insist that an editor not spam my talkpage to repeat tired talking points from an active discussion. The notion that a person committing self-immolation to protest the imprisonment of a PKK leader isn't a "political" self-immolation bc the imprisoned person is a terrorist is absolutely ludicrous. Combined with the removal of other Kurdish self-immolators repeatedly on completely unsubstantiated claims of being a Newroz accident (despite multiple RS indicating self-immolation) gave a clear indication that I was dealing with a POV-pushing "cleaner". I am aware that because the status of the PKK leader as a terrorist is disputed (Turkey consideres PKK terrorist, most other states don't), I think it is best not to label him as terrorist in the listing. The removal of other listings was not intentional but a mere accidental byproduct of reverting. I would also like to point out that the other user in question has not exerted due competence, generating various wikitext-based and formatting errors that I had to correct in their rush to remove certain pro-Kurdish self-immolators from the list. I suggest a Kurdish, Armenian, Turkish, and Azerbaijan based topic-ban for LeticiaLL given their recent behavior and severe disregard for wiki norms. Such blatant ideological vandalism requires reversion.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)