User talk:EGL1234

User	Talk	To Do	Toolbox	Books	User Boxes	Quotes	Announcements

ARCHIVES

An archive contains 50 messages, then it is deemed full. Please note that I am quite strict regarding archiving.
 :)
If a conversation is over, I will archive it ASAP.

• Archive 1

Edits on Football First League of North Kosovo

Good Day,

It would be great if I would receive a explaination for the reverting of my edit about the "First League of North Kosovo".

Greetings, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.14.206.98 (talk) 12:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

@81.14.206.98: Hello. I reverted the edit, because some of it disobeyed the Manual of Style (MoS), and some of it appeared to be information added without any citation. EGL¹²³⁴ 12:57, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Block reinstated

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal. Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

• Dedpite PugGrammarBot being blocked, you have once again created an an unauthorized and undisclosed bot account that caused enough disruption to be brought to ANI. This is not an acceptable use of multiple accounts.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
• Additional accounts created unnecessarily of which only two were disclosed: ~~ImRichEnoughForAButler~~, Tojodavid and 70RP3D0-MLWR.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

@Ponyo: Hi. I forgot about Butler and mlwr, but the edits were a test to see whether wikipedia would pick up on it. Additionally, it was not editing any pages apart from its own sandbox. Please unblock me. Thank you. EGL¹²³⁴ 02:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

EGL1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}