Talk:Supply chain management: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Supply chain management/Archives/2018. (BOT) |
BobKilcoyne (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Google only returned one relevant reference to SECH <ref>https://books.google.es/books?id=5Llh4zQj1gIC&pg=PA254&lpg=PA254&dq=SECH+Rating&source=bl&ots=prVXV5fdBP&sig=ACfU3U0bU_uWvEOTiyPMNG4A9bGT-Va4bw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjluvy3xM3rAhXUAWMBHZnRB2AQ6AEwAXoECAEQAQ#v=onepage&q=SECH%20Rating&f=false</ref>, which was nearly verbatim to this passage. There were more hits on ESG and other sustainability measures. Sustainability Ratings is likely a valid section, but the use of SECH should probably be removed. [[User:BBQTortilla|BBQTortilla]] ([[User talk:BBQTortilla|talk]]) 18:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC) |
Google only returned one relevant reference to SECH <ref>https://books.google.es/books?id=5Llh4zQj1gIC&pg=PA254&lpg=PA254&dq=SECH+Rating&source=bl&ots=prVXV5fdBP&sig=ACfU3U0bU_uWvEOTiyPMNG4A9bGT-Va4bw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjluvy3xM3rAhXUAWMBHZnRB2AQ6AEwAXoECAEQAQ#v=onepage&q=SECH%20Rating&f=false</ref>, which was nearly verbatim to this passage. There were more hits on ESG and other sustainability measures. Sustainability Ratings is likely a valid section, but the use of SECH should probably be removed. [[User:BBQTortilla|BBQTortilla]] ([[User talk:BBQTortilla|talk]]) 18:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Topics addressed by selected professional supply chain certification programmes == |
|||
Article has a note from October 2017 proposing a [[Wikipedia:Splitting|split]] for the material on '''professional supply chain certification programmes'''. The proposal discussion is [[Talk:Supply chain management/Archives/2017#Comparison of supply chain certification programmes|archived]] with no discussion other that the split proposal by [[User:Biogeographist|Biogeographist]]. I '''agree''' that the table seems too large and specific for this article and support the proposed split, but I would call the article "Supply chain certification programmes" without the reference to "comparisons". - [[User:BobKilcoyne|BobKilcoyne]] ([[User talk:BobKilcoyne|talk]]) 05:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:25, 25 March 2021
Certified Supply Chain Professional was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 8 February 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Supply chain management. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Certified Supply Chain Professional was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 20 May 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Supply chain management. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Supply chain management article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand.(September 2010) |
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
References missing
A lot of references are missing. For Example (Akkerman, 2001) is mentioned in the text but there is no reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.45.12.231 (talk) 10:13, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
“SCM 2.0” reads like corporate spam
That section reeks like an ad for TrueC*rd. Mrflip (talk) 05:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
"SECH" Commonly used?
Google only returned one relevant reference to SECH [1], which was nearly verbatim to this passage. There were more hits on ESG and other sustainability measures. Sustainability Ratings is likely a valid section, but the use of SECH should probably be removed. BBQTortilla (talk) 18:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Topics addressed by selected professional supply chain certification programmes
Article has a note from October 2017 proposing a split for the material on professional supply chain certification programmes. The proposal discussion is archived with no discussion other that the split proposal by Biogeographist. I agree that the table seems too large and specific for this article and support the proposed split, but I would call the article "Supply chain certification programmes" without the reference to "comparisons". - BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- High-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class Systems articles
- Mid-importance Systems articles
- Systems articles in systems
- WikiProject Systems articles
- C-Class Retailing articles
- Mid-importance Retailing articles
- WikiProject Retailing articles
- C-Class Transport articles
- Mid-importance Transport articles
- WikiProject Transport articles