Kuthi Valley: Difference between revisions
m Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 11 templates: del empty params (2×); hyphenate params (2×); |
→Nepalese claims: Removing spurious citation |
||
| Line 295: | Line 295: | ||
== Nepalese claims == |
== Nepalese claims == |
||
The Byans region was originally part of Kumaon and the whole of Kumaon was under rule of Nepal ([[Gorkha]]) for 25 years. |
The Byans region was originally part of Kumaon and the whole of Kumaon was under rule of Nepal ([[Gorkha]]) for 25 years. After the [[Anglo-Nepalese War]] and the ensuing [[Treaty of Sugauli]], the Kali River was agreed as the border between Kumaon and Nepal. In 1817, the Nepal Darbar claimed the villages of Tinkar and Chhangru as per the terms of the treaty, and the [[Governor General of India|British Governor General]] acquiesced. The Nepalese then made the further claim that the Kuthi valley also belonged to them on the grounds that Kuthi Yankti was the main headwater of Kali. This claim was rejected by the British on the grounds that, by tradition and convention, the Kali River is taken to begin at the Kalapani village, where the dark-coloured springs flowing into the river give it the name "Kali". ("Kali" means black in Hindi.)<ref>{{harvp|Atkinson, Himalayan Gazetteer, Vol. 2, Part 2|1981|pp=679–680}}: "Captain Webb and others showed that the lesser stream flowing from the sacred fountain of Kalapani had always been recognised as the main branch of the Kali and had in fact given its name to the river during its course through the hills. The Government, therefore, decided to retain both Nabhi and Kunti, which have ever since remained attached to British Byans."</ref> |
||
The claim to the Kuthi Valley was revived by the Nepalese geographer [[Buddhi Narayan Shrestha]] in 1999, who, after studying old maps of the early 19th century, came to the conclusion that "the origin of Mahakali River lies almost 16 kilometres northwest of Kalapani at Limpiyadhura".<ref>{{citation |last=Śreshṭha |first=Buddhi Nārāyaṇa |chapter=Maps show Kalapani belongs to Nepal |title=Border Management of Nepal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W31uAAAAMAAJ |year=2003 |publisher=Bhumichitra |isbn=978-99933-57-42-1 |pp=126–129 |orig-year=first published in 1999 in ''Sunday Despatch'' Weekly}}</ref> In May 2020, the Nepalese government made the claim official by endorsing a new map of Nepal that shows the Kuthi Valley as part of Nepal. The Prime Minister K. P. Oli declared that the country would "reclaim" it.<ref>PTI, [https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/nepal-approves-new-map-including-lipulekh-kalapani-limpiyadhura-amidst-border-row-with-india/article31621475.ece Nepal approves new map including Lipulekh, Kalapani, Limpiyadhura amidst border row with India], The Hindu, 19 May 2020.</ref> India responded that it was a unilateral act that was "not based on historical facts and evidence".<ref>[https://english.onlinekhabar.com/india-nepal-map-is-artificial-enlargement-of-territorial-claims-wont-accept-it.html India: Nepal map is ‘artificial enlargement of territorial claims’, won’t accept it], online khabar, 21 May 2020.</ref> |
The claim to the Kuthi Valley was revived by the Nepalese geographer [[Buddhi Narayan Shrestha]] in 1999, who, after studying old maps of the early 19th century, came to the conclusion that "the origin of Mahakali River lies almost 16 kilometres northwest of Kalapani at Limpiyadhura".<ref>{{citation |last=Śreshṭha |first=Buddhi Nārāyaṇa |chapter=Maps show Kalapani belongs to Nepal |title=Border Management of Nepal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W31uAAAAMAAJ |year=2003 |publisher=Bhumichitra |isbn=978-99933-57-42-1 |pp=126–129 |orig-year=first published in 1999 in ''Sunday Despatch'' Weekly}}</ref> In May 2020, the Nepalese government made the claim official by endorsing a new map of Nepal that shows the Kuthi Valley as part of Nepal. The Prime Minister K. P. Oli declared that the country would "reclaim" it.<ref>PTI, [https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/nepal-approves-new-map-including-lipulekh-kalapani-limpiyadhura-amidst-border-row-with-india/article31621475.ece Nepal approves new map including Lipulekh, Kalapani, Limpiyadhura amidst border row with India], The Hindu, 19 May 2020.</ref> India responded that it was a unilateral act that was "not based on historical facts and evidence".<ref>[https://english.onlinekhabar.com/india-nepal-map-is-artificial-enlargement-of-territorial-claims-wont-accept-it.html India: Nepal map is ‘artificial enlargement of territorial claims’, won’t accept it], online khabar, 21 May 2020.</ref> |
||
Revision as of 16:15, 28 March 2021
| Kuthi Valley | |
|---|---|
| Length | 30 |
| Geography | |
| Country | India |
| State | Uttarakhand |
| Region | Kumaon |
| District | Pithoragarh |
| Coordinates | 30°19′N 80°46′E / 30.31°N 80.76°E |
Kuthi Valley is a Himalayan valley situated in the Pithoragarh District, Kumaon division of the Uttarakhand state of India. Located in the eastern part of Uttarakhand, it is the last valley before the border with Tibet. It runs along a NW to SE axis, formed by the river Kuthi Yankti, which is one of the headwaters of the Kali River that forms the boundary between India and Nepal in this region.
This valley is mainly dominated by Byansis, one of the four Bhotiya communities of Kumaon, with the others being Johar, Darmiya and Chaudansi.[1][2]
In May 2020, Nepal laid claim to the northeastern half of the valley, claiming that Kuthi Yanki represented the Kali River and it was meant to be Nepal's border by the 1816 Sugauli Treaty. India said that the claim was not based on historical facts and evidence.[3]
Kuthi Yankti river
10miles
(CHINA)
(INDIA)
River
Ganga
Dhauli
Yankti
Yankti
Khola
Pass
Kuthi Yankti is one of the two headwaters of the Kali River, the other being the Kalapani River that flows down from the Lipulekh Pass.[4]
Kuthi Yankti emerges from slopes near Wilsha, below the Limpiyadhura range, and passes Lake Jolingkong at an altitude of 4,630 m, to the Kuti village. It flows southeast to merge with the Kalapani River near the Gunji village to form the Kali River (or Sharada River). High Himalayan passes of Mangsha Dhura (5,490 m) and Limpiya Dhura (5,530 m) are situated along the northern border of the Kuthi valley joining it with Tibet. Shin La pass and Nama pass join Darma Valley to Kuthi valley from the south. Jolingkong and Parvati are main alpine lakes.[5] Sangthang Peak is the highest along the line of peaks forming the northern boundary of the valley with Tibet. Among the peaks forming the southern boundary of the valley, notable peaks are Brammah Parvat (6,321 m), Cheepaydang (6,220 m) and Adi Kailash (5,945 m).
Byans and Byansis
Kuthi Yankti is part of the Byans ethnographic region, which comprises Kuthi valley as well as the Kali River valley within its vicinity and the Tinkar valley in Nepal. The people of this region are called Byansis, who speak a distinctive Byangsi language. There are five Byans villages in the Kuthi valley (Gunji, Nabi, Rongkang, Napalchu and Kuti), two along the Kali River (Budi and Garbyang) and two in the Tinkar valley (Chhangru and Tinkar). In later times, two new villages were founded in Nepal (Rapla and Sitaula).[6] Kuti is the last village in the Kuthi valley, at an elevation of 12,300 feet (3,700 m). Garbyang, at the junction of Tinkar River with Kali, is the largest.[7]
Nepalese claims
The Byans region was originally part of Kumaon and the whole of Kumaon was under rule of Nepal (Gorkha) for 25 years. After the Anglo-Nepalese War and the ensuing Treaty of Sugauli, the Kali River was agreed as the border between Kumaon and Nepal. In 1817, the Nepal Darbar claimed the villages of Tinkar and Chhangru as per the terms of the treaty, and the British Governor General acquiesced. The Nepalese then made the further claim that the Kuthi valley also belonged to them on the grounds that Kuthi Yankti was the main headwater of Kali. This claim was rejected by the British on the grounds that, by tradition and convention, the Kali River is taken to begin at the Kalapani village, where the dark-coloured springs flowing into the river give it the name "Kali". ("Kali" means black in Hindi.)[8]
The claim to the Kuthi Valley was revived by the Nepalese geographer Buddhi Narayan Shrestha in 1999, who, after studying old maps of the early 19th century, came to the conclusion that "the origin of Mahakali River lies almost 16 kilometres northwest of Kalapani at Limpiyadhura".[9] In May 2020, the Nepalese government made the claim official by endorsing a new map of Nepal that shows the Kuthi Valley as part of Nepal. The Prime Minister K. P. Oli declared that the country would "reclaim" it.[10] India responded that it was a unilateral act that was "not based on historical facts and evidence".[11]
See also
- Kalapani territory – for the territorial dispute between India and Nepal
References
- ^ Bergmann, Confluent territories and overlapping sovereignties (2016), p. 89.
- ^ Chatterjee, The Bhotias of Uttarakhand (1976), pp. 8–9: "[...] the four Kumaon Bhotia communities, viz., the Johar, the Darma, the Chaudans and the Byans, share greater similarities among themselves"
- ^ New Nepal map hardens position over land disputed with India, Reuters, 20 May 2020.
- ^ Hoon, Living on the Move (1996), p. 48: "The river Kaliganga forms a natural boundary between India and Nepal. It has two headwaters: the eastern one Kalapani is a collection of springs, and the western one Kutiyankti rises from the snow fields of the Himadri near Kuti, the last Bhotiya village in Vyas [Byas]."
- ^ Heim, Arnold; Gansser, August (1939), The Throne of the Gods: An account of the first Swiss expedition to the Himalayas (PDF), Macmillan
- ^ Nagano & LaPolla, New Research on Zhangzhung and Related Himalayan Languages (2001), p. 499.
- ^ Chatterjee, The Bhotias of Uttarakhand (1976), p. 9.
- ^ Atkinson, Himalayan Gazetteer, Vol. 2, Part 2 (1981), pp. 679–680: "Captain Webb and others showed that the lesser stream flowing from the sacred fountain of Kalapani had always been recognised as the main branch of the Kali and had in fact given its name to the river during its course through the hills. The Government, therefore, decided to retain both Nabhi and Kunti, which have ever since remained attached to British Byans."
- ^ Śreshṭha, Buddhi Nārāyaṇa (2003) [first published in 1999 in Sunday Despatch Weekly], "Maps show Kalapani belongs to Nepal", Border Management of Nepal, Bhumichitra, pp. 126–129, ISBN 978-99933-57-42-1
- ^ PTI, Nepal approves new map including Lipulekh, Kalapani, Limpiyadhura amidst border row with India, The Hindu, 19 May 2020.
- ^ India: Nepal map is ‘artificial enlargement of territorial claims’, won’t accept it, online khabar, 21 May 2020.
Bibliography
- Atkinson, Edwin Thomas (1981) [first published 1884], The Himalayan Gazetteer, Volume 2, Part 2, Cosmo Publications – via archive.org
- Bergmann, Christoph (2016). "Confluent territories and overlapping sovereignties: Britain's nineteenth-century Indian empire in the Kumaon Himalaya". Journal of Historical Geography. 51: 88–98. doi:10.1016/j.jhg.2015.06.015. ISSN 0305-7488.
- Chatterjee, Bishwa B. (January 1976), "The Bhotias of Uttarakhand", India International Centre Quarterly, 3 (1): 3–16, JSTOR 23001864
- Hoon, Vineeta (1996), Living on the Move: Bhotiyas of the Kumaon Himalaya, Sage Publications, ISBN 978-0-8039-9325-9
- Nagano, Yasuhiko; LaPolla, Randy J. (2001), New Research on Zhangzhung and Related Himalayan Languages: Bon Studies 3, National Museum of Ethnology
- Rawat, Ajay Singh (1999), Forest Management in Kumaon Himalaya: Struggle of the Marginalised People, Indus Publishing, ISBN 978-81-7387-101-6
- Varma, Uma (1994), Uttar Pradesh State Gazetteer, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh, Dept. of District Gazetteers
- Walton, H. G., ed. (1911), Almora: A Gazetteer, District Gazetteers of the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh, vol. 35, Government Press, United Provinces – via archive.org