Talk:Social Democratic Movement: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:44, 1 April 2021

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Bolivia Low‑importance

	Bolivia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoliviaWikipedia:WikiProject BoliviaTemplate:WikiProject BoliviaBolivia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Democrat Social Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of a coup.

While the crisis eventually led to an acceptance of the lawful transfer of power, the circumstances around the resignation of Morales is accepted by a significant part of analysts and media as at least an alleged coup. Ip says: Work Better yes. (talk) 02:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since phrasing on this issue is divisive, I try to word things carefully. Instead of "after the alleged coup," I'd say "after what Morales and his supporters alleged as a coup" or something to that effect. One sentence points you in a pretty clear direction while the other leaves more up for interpretation. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 15:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:09, 1 April 2021 edit Ip says (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 683 edits →Allegations of a coup.: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:44, 1 April 2021 edit undo Krisgabwoosh (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 41,372 edits →Allegations of a coup. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor Next edit →
Line 22:		Line 22:

	While the crisis eventually led to an acceptance of the lawful transfer of power, the circumstances around the resignation of Morales is accepted by a significant part of analysts and media as at least an alleged coup. [[User:Ip says\|Ip says: Work Better yes.]] ([[User talk:Ip says\|talk]]) 02:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)		While the crisis eventually led to an acceptance of the lawful transfer of power, the circumstances around the resignation of Morales is accepted by a significant part of analysts and media as at least an alleged coup. [[User:Ip says\|Ip says: Work Better yes.]] ([[User talk:Ip says\|talk]]) 02:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
			: Since phrasing on this issue is divisive, I try to word things carefully. Instead of "after the alleged coup," I'd say "after what Morales and his supporters alleged as a coup" or something to that effect. One sentence points you in a pretty clear direction while the other leaves more up for interpretation. [[User:Krisgabwoosh\|Krisgabwoosh]] ([[User talk:Krisgabwoosh\|talk]]) 15:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)