Talk:Cyrtophora citricola/GA1: Difference between revisions
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* {{strikethrough|Fully spell out the genus name at the first occurrence in each section; you can then use abbreviations elsewhere within that section. Also the convention is to put   between the "." and the species name in the wikitext, e.g. "C. citricola", to avoid ending a line with something like "C.". This goes for other species (like ''Argyrodes argyrodes'') as well.}} |
* {{strikethrough|Fully spell out the genus name at the first occurrence in each section; you can then use abbreviations elsewhere within that section. Also the convention is to put   between the "." and the species name in the wikitext, e.g. "C. citricola", to avoid ending a line with something like "C.". This goes for other species (like ''Argyrodes argyrodes'') as well.}} |
||
* How can someone discover a species posthumously? |
* How can someone discover a species posthumously? |
||
* ''The spider was later moved from the genus Aranea genus to Cyrtophora''. I think the second "genus" is in the wrong place. |
* {{strikethrough|''The spider was later moved from the genus Aranea genus to Cyrtophora''. I think the second "genus" is in the wrong place.}} |
||
* {{strikethrough|There's a bad character in ref 1, no title listed for ref 19, and the journal name is missing from ref 30.}} |
* {{strikethrough|There's a bad character in ref 1, no title listed for ref 19, and the journal name is missing from ref 30.}} |
||
Once you've indicated that you're still around to make necessary improvements, I'll continue with my review. [[User:MeegsC|MeegsC]] ([[User talk:MeegsC|talk]]) 11:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC) |
Once you've indicated that you're still around to make necessary improvements, I'll continue with my review. [[User:MeegsC|MeegsC]] ([[User talk:MeegsC|talk]]) 11:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 05:20, 2 April 2021
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MeegsC (talk · contribs) 16:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this one. It may take me several days to post my first comments. MeegsC (talk) 16:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi M.s.w.lee. Given that this appears to have been a class project, I'll post a few initial comments to make sure you are still planning to work on the article. Please strike out these issues once you've had the chance to fix them. I've got this page on my watchlist, but feel free to ping me if you have any questions.
- The lede should summarize the major points of the article. This one is a bit skimpy, and should be expanded accordingly.
- Take a look at redback spider, one of Wikipedia's FA-level articles, or the recently-promoted Pholcus phalangioides. I'd suggest that you structure this article similarly. You obviously won't need all of those sections (this spider, for instance, isn't seriously venomous, so you don't need a huge section about venom, and it's not as culturally important as that one is), but it would be good to be consistent where possible with other spider articles.
All measurements should be in imperial as well as metric units. The {{convert}} template is a great one to use here. Ping me if you're not sure how to use it.Fully spell out the genus name at the first occurrence in each section; you can then use abbreviations elsewhere within that section. Also the convention is to put between the "." and the species name in the wikitext, e.g. "C. citricola", to avoid ending a line with something like "C.". This goes for other species (like Argyrodes argyrodes) as well.- How can someone discover a species posthumously?
The spider was later moved from the genus Aranea genus to Cyrtophora. I think the second "genus" is in the wrong place.There's a bad character in ref 1, no title listed for ref 19, and the journal name is missing from ref 30.
Once you've indicated that you're still around to make necessary improvements, I'll continue with my review. MeegsC (talk) 11:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi MeegsC. Thank you for reviewing this article. I will get started on these comments and let you know when I work through all of them!M.s.w.lee (talk)
Hi MeegsC. I looked at the references, and deleted ref 19, and recited it under a different reference that provided the same information. I also added the journal for ref 30. I was having trouble seeing the bad character in ref 1, but I changed the character in ref 2 that said character replacement was that the ref that needed to be edited? M.s.w.lee (talk) 03:42, 2 April 2021 (UTC)