Jump to content

Assize of Northampton: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Line 33: Line 33:
[[Category:1176 in England]]
[[Category:1176 in England]]
[[Category:Medieval English law]]
[[Category:Medieval English law]]
[[Category:Assizes]]

Revision as of 21:47, 2 April 2021

The Assize of Northampton, largely based on the Assize of Clarendon of 1166, is among a series of measures taken by King Henry II of England that solidified the rights of the knightly tenants and made all possession of land subject to and guaranteed by royal law.

The assize is believed to have been passed at a council held in Northampton in January 1176.

Clarendon extended

The assize confirmed the offences to be brought forward by the jury of presentment according to Clarendon, and added arson and forgery to the list.[1] It also set down new and severe punishments that could be handed down, including the removal of an offender's right hand.

Aftermath of revolt

Following as it did the Revolt of 1173–74, the Assizes included a wide-ranging oath of fealty (Item 6), as well as items concerning castles (8 and 11), insisting especially that "the justices see to it that the castles which have been destroyed are utterly demolished."[2]

Administrative reforms

The assize is connected with the reorganisation of itinerant justices and contains instructions for six groups of justices appointed to tour the country. Bailiffs and sheriffs were made answerable for their profits, as well as given powers to hold thieves.[3] Clause 7 dealt with the introduction of important new legislation, chiefly the king's right to have certain cases brought into his court.

The Assize of Northampton is also the first official document to contain information on the question of seisin and disseisin, anticipating the later possessory assizes of mort d'ancestor and novel disseisin.[4]

Revenue

Crown revenue increased significantly following the Assize, reflecting the impact of the judicial eyres.[5] As G. M. Trevelyan put it, "The Justices were quite as busy collecting the King's revenues as enforcing the King's peace. They were two sides of the same operation."[6]

See also

References

  1. ^ G. O. Sayles, The Medieval Foundations of England (London 1967) p. 336
  2. ^ Quoted in D. Baker ed., The Early Middle Ages (London 1966) p. 151
  3. ^ D. Baker ed., The Early Middle Ages (London 1966) p. 151-2
  4. ^ J. R. Tanner ed., The Cambridge Medieval History (1926) p. 586
  5. ^ H. G. Richrdson, The English Jewry under the Angevin Kings (London 1960) p. 64
  6. ^ G. M. Trevelyan, History of England (London 1926) p. 161