Jump to content

User:Ched/Arbcom: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
add WP:Rexarb links
WP:Rexarb references: fix redirect link
Line 13: Line 13:
* to review for formatting, content, and flow of posts.
* to review for formatting, content, and flow of posts.


== [[WP:Rexarb]] references ==
== [[WP:ARBREX]] references ==
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Iridescent&oldid=1016272970#Curious_for_your_take AC/N]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Iridescent&oldid=1016272970#Curious_for_your_take AC/N]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=1016213653
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=1016213653

Revision as of 09:14, 6 April 2021

My page to deal with all things Arbcom:

IMO thoughts

very rough draft here, but some passing thoughts.

  • There should be a minimum effort at DR prior to filing a case (outside emergency actions). Be it 3 or 4 or whatever number should be decided upon, there should be some community review at some DR board. (AN, AN/I, etc.)
  • I think that once a case has been accepted, then anyone wishing to offer evidence should be added to the case, and their own actions should be open to review
  • Arbs and former arbs should not be contributing evidence unless the case involves them directly, and they should be added to the case party list if they do
  • Absolutely NO arb (past or present) should be stating "I think editorx should be sanctioned" outside the active arbs in the PD vote.
  • I think some sort of appeal process should be instituted. Especially when new evidence/facts/circumstances come to light post PD.
  • NO arb should incite, encourage, or even hint at another editor filing a case; either on-wiki, or especially off-wiki. If an Arb feels a case should be filed, then they should have the integrity to file it themselves and stand as a party to the case. Anything less is unbecoming.

Rough drafts

  • to review for formatting, content, and flow of posts.

WP:ARBREX references