Jump to content

Talk:NATS Holdings: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment: Aviation: class=C; +Organizations: class=C, importance=Low; +United Kingdom: class=C, importance=Low (assisted)
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Aviation |class=C}}{{WikiProject Organizations |class=C |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject Aviation|class=C}}
{{WikiProject Organizations|class=C |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United Kingdom |class=C |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United Kingdom|class=C |importance=Low}}
}}


== Advertising? ==
== Advertising? ==

Revision as of 19:44, 6 April 2021

Advertising?

Links to a not particularly major software supplier added by an employee of that company don't seem relevant. I propose deleting this (or should we add links to all NATS' suppliers?) GTH1 (talk) 21:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Northern Oceanic Transition Area

The operations section should probably also mention NOTA. www.nats.co.uk/8050-9013/IAA-and-NATS-sign-letter-of-intent.html

Md84419 (talk) 12:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

line in introduction reads like advertisement

line "NATS aims to set standards in safety, service and value to their customers – the airlines." reads like an advertisement or directly from nats marketing - doesn't seem to add any value --Richlv (talk) 02:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some structural changes needed

Suggests that the article is restructured so that it focusses on present time and not primary history.

The IAA/UK FAB actually changes the scene in a way that is not reflected in the text - enroute charges are required to unified for the complete FAB after at most 5 years from signature. Governance is no longer solely CAA but the FAB high level board.

The text needs an overhaul to be updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcs45 (talkcontribs) 06:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]