Talk:NATS Holdings: Difference between revisions
Assessment: Aviation: class=C; +Organizations: class=C, importance=Low; +United Kingdom: class=C, importance=Low (assisted) |
→top: Added Template:WikiProject banner shell and other General fixes |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Aviation|class=C}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Organizations|class=C |importance=Low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject United Kingdom |
{{WikiProject United Kingdom|class=C |importance=Low}} |
||
}} |
|||
== Advertising? == |
== Advertising? == |
Revision as of 19:44, 6 April 2021
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Advertising?
Links to a not particularly major software supplier added by an employee of that company don't seem relevant. I propose deleting this (or should we add links to all NATS' suppliers?) GTH1 (talk) 21:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Northern Oceanic Transition Area
The operations section should probably also mention NOTA. www.nats.co.uk/8050-9013/IAA-and-NATS-sign-letter-of-intent.html
Md84419 (talk) 12:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
line in introduction reads like advertisement
line "NATS aims to set standards in safety, service and value to their customers – the airlines." reads like an advertisement or directly from nats marketing - doesn't seem to add any value --Richlv (talk) 02:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Some structural changes needed
Suggests that the article is restructured so that it focusses on present time and not primary history.
The IAA/UK FAB actually changes the scene in a way that is not reflected in the text - enroute charges are required to unified for the complete FAB after at most 5 years from signature. Governance is no longer solely CAA but the FAB high level board.
The text needs an overhaul to be updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcs45 (talk • contribs) 06:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC)