Talk:Miiverse: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I don't feel that the page should include discussion of continuations of Miiverse. Most of them garnered limited usage, and were very small compared to Miiverse. ([[User talk:NotJoeBidenTho|talk]]) 17:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC) |
I don't feel that the page should include discussion of continuations of Miiverse. Most of them garnered limited usage, and were very small compared to Miiverse. ([[User talk:NotJoeBidenTho|talk]]) 17:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
I think it's not a bad idea to briefly mention them, but we don't need to go in depth into them. There are dedicated wikis to clone lore and while I agree with you that most didn't get much traction, there are examples like Closedverse, which had over 8000 registered users and Rverse which is still active to this day. I'm not saying we should mention every clone and who made them, I'm saying we could have an "Aftermath" section which basically says attempts at remaking this were made with the most popular among them being Closedverse or Rverse ---- |
Revision as of 14:05, 15 April 2021
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Nintendo Network was copied or moved into Miiverse with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Clones
I don't feel that the page should include discussion of continuations of Miiverse. Most of them garnered limited usage, and were very small compared to Miiverse. (talk) 17:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
I think it's not a bad idea to briefly mention them, but we don't need to go in depth into them. There are dedicated wikis to clone lore and while I agree with you that most didn't get much traction, there are examples like Closedverse, which had over 8000 registered users and Rverse which is still active to this day. I'm not saying we should mention every clone and who made them, I'm saying we could have an "Aftermath" section which basically says attempts at remaking this were made with the most popular among them being Closedverse or Rverse ----
- C-Class Internet culture articles
- Low-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- C-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- C-Class Nintendo articles
- Nintendo task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- WikiProject Apps
- C-Class apps articles
- Low-importance apps articles
- WikiProject Apps articles