Jump to content

Talk:Miiverse: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mintphin (talk | contribs)
Mintphin (talk | contribs)
Line 11: Line 11:
I don't feel that the page should include discussion of continuations of Miiverse. Most of them garnered limited usage, and were very small compared to Miiverse. ([[User talk:NotJoeBidenTho|talk]]) 17:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
I don't feel that the page should include discussion of continuations of Miiverse. Most of them garnered limited usage, and were very small compared to Miiverse. ([[User talk:NotJoeBidenTho|talk]]) 17:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


I think it's not a bad idea to briefly mention them, but we don't need to go in depth into them. There are dedicated wikis to clone lore and while I agree with you that most didn't get much traction, there are examples like Closedverse, which had over 8000 registered users and Rverse which is still active to this day. I'm not saying we should mention every clone and who made them, I'm saying we could have an "Aftermath" section which basically says attempts at remaking this were made with the most popular among them being Closedverse or Rverse [[User:Mintphin|Mintphin]] ([[User talk:Mintphin|talk]]) 14:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
I think it's not a bad idea to briefly mention them, but we don't need to go in depth into them. There are dedicated wikis to clone lore and while I agree with you that most didn't get much traction, there are examples like Closedverse, which had over 8000 registered users and Rverse which is still active to this day. I'm not saying we should mention every clone and who made them, I'm saying we could have an "Aftermath" section which basically says attempts at remaking this were made with the most popular among them being Closedverse or Rverse. [[User:Mintphin|Mintphin]] ([[User talk:Mintphin|talk]]) 14:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:06, 15 April 2021


Clones

I don't feel that the page should include discussion of continuations of Miiverse. Most of them garnered limited usage, and were very small compared to Miiverse. (talk) 17:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's not a bad idea to briefly mention them, but we don't need to go in depth into them. There are dedicated wikis to clone lore and while I agree with you that most didn't get much traction, there are examples like Closedverse, which had over 8000 registered users and Rverse which is still active to this day. I'm not saying we should mention every clone and who made them, I'm saying we could have an "Aftermath" section which basically says attempts at remaking this were made with the most popular among them being Closedverse or Rverse. Mintphin (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]