Talk:Three quarter pants: Difference between revisions
Content merged to Capri pants |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Fashion|class=stub|importance=}} |
{{WikiProject Fashion|class=stub|importance=}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{Find sources notice|search1=three quarter pants|search2=pedal pushers |search3=clam diggers|search4=flood pants|search5=jams|search6=highwaters|search7=culottes}} |
|||
==A note== |
==A note== |
Revision as of 00:27, 19 April 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Three quarter pants redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Fashion NA‑class | |||||||
|
The contents of the Three quarter pants page were merged into Capri pants on 30 March 2016 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
A note
Would this be the appropriate place for the women's fashion called "Crops" or "crop pants"? KitchM (talk) 20:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
The image
I believe that the image currently used here does not actually show pedal pushers. If you look closely you will see that the pants have been pulled up into folds, presumably to let the sunshine onto the woman's legs, and no doubt also to make her look prettier for the photographer. I am not at all convinced that when she stood up again her pants would be any shorter than ankle length. I also believe that pedal pushers as a fashion did not exist earlier than the 1950s in the USA. Plus this woman is working in a factory during the war. Full length pants are a proper protection against metal debris in a factory setting; shorter pants would not be. Invertzoo (talk) 14:49, 23 February 2012 (UTC)