User talk:P.sitansu: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:19, 27 April 2021

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, P.sitansu! Thank you for your contributions. I am WereSpielChequers and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
How to write a great article
The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Ϣere SpielChequers 07:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you P.sitansu (talk) 08:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kaibarta

Please note that disambiguation pages like Kaibarta are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 13:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mohanty

Hello. Your recent edit to Mohanty appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Sarala Temple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kamala and Narayani

Achyutananda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gajapati

Sarala Das (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gajapati

Udayagiri, Odisha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks P.sitansu (talk) 07:15, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Baladevjew Temple, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,Thanks P.sitansu (talk) 10:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Maa Mangala Temple, Kakatpur

added links pointing to Kalinga and Utkala

Manikeswari

added links pointing to Dhenkanal and Sonepur

Aami Mandir

added a link pointing to Pashupatinath

Grishneshwar Temple

added a link pointing to Gaya

Kapileshwar Temple

added a link pointing to Hanuman Temple

Mahamaya Temple

added a link pointing to Bilaspur district

Mundeshwari Temple

added a link pointing to Naga dynasty

Pana Sankranti

added a link pointing to Hanuman Temple

Raghunath Temple

added a link pointing to Indian languages

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grishneshwar Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaya.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for this mistake, but I am rectified now this disambiguation link Gaya to Gaya, India. Thanks P.sitansu (talk) 10:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions - such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks - on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Bishonen | tålk 23:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Your edits to Yadav

In editing Yadav, you have kept the text "the association of the Yadav (and their constituent castes, Ahir and Gwala) with cattle has impacted on their commonly viewed ritual status (varna) as Shudra, although the community's members often claim the higher status of Kshatriya. The Shudra status is explained by the nomadic nature of herdsmen, which constrained the ability of other groups in the varna system to validate the adherence to practices of ritual purity; by their involvement in castration of the animals, which was considered to be a ritually polluting act;", except that you simply changed Shudra to Vaishya where it occurred. That doesn't make sense, since ritual pollution has historically applied to Shudra, not Vaishya. Nor can I see that it's supported by the reference you provide. Please note that caste promotion is not allowed on Wikipedia, which is supposed to give neutral well-sourced information. Bishonen | tålk 23:49, 12 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]

British Raj sources

Sources from the British Raj era, such as Robert Vane Russell, are not considered reliable for Wikipedia, so please don't use them, as you did here. See this discussion. Bishonen | tålk 10:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen,ok thanks. P.sitansu (talk) 11:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add to what Bishonen said, because I was typing the same sort of message when the one above appeared, you'll find sometimes that a book appears to be more modern than in fact it is. This happened in the edit that Bishonen mentioned because the publication year for the first source you used was 2011 but it is a reprint of something written many, many years earlier. Asian Educational Services are a publisher to be particularly careful with in this regard - it sometimes seems that everything they print is just copies of Raj era works, probably because they are out of copyright. - Sitush (talk) 11:48, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can also look at our article Robert Vane Russell: born 1873, died 1915. A Raj ethnographer. Bishonen | tålk 15:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Behera (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bania.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karan (caste), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Das.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Namrata Das, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali film.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karanam Page Vandalism

Please protect the Karanam Caste page from constant vandalism. We can both see constant vandalism. I request you to report to the administrator about the vandals and the vandalism. I will be indebted to you. Ayushsinha2222 (talk) 15:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Removing Reliable Sources

You removed reliable source from Both Routray and Samantray surname intentionally. First check the sources and the page no. Before removing reliable information. Otherwise i will have to report to the Admins. Your vandalism directly violating the Wikipedia policy of No Original Research. Peacepks (talk) 15:36, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now this source is clearly mentioned about your edits. P.sitansu (talk) 17:15, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Caste Glorification in Bhoi Dynasty Page

Stop spam Edits immediately by adding karana word despite the source never mentioned it. Your edits violate Wikipedia policy WP:NOR. Another spam edit & I will have to tag the admins. Peacepks (talk) 02:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

first check Krishna Chandra Panigrahi's book P.sitansu (talk) 02:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bhoi Dynasty origin

I have started a discussion in Bhoi Dynasty talk page. We can discuss the issue entirely there. FYI, The third column is started with " According to KC Panigrahi " that means all information from KC Panigrahi book will be shared on the same column. It actually doesn't matter whether Madala Panji agree with Sri janga inscription or not. Because the column doesn't started with "According to Madala Panji. If we don't come up with any solution then it will be better to Quote all information from KC Panigrahi book directly. Wikipedia Quotations actually says to use it in case conflict arises among editors.

I think you don't like " At any rate they were not Kshatriyas" line. But there is nothing wrong in the sentence. Karanas are part of Kayastha Category which have separate lineage from Chitragupta. And they don't call themselves as Kshatriya. Gopals claim Yaduvanshi Kshatriya lineage but generally not accepted as so. Rest we can discuss. Peacepks (talk) 18:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, Karanas don't call themselves as Kshatriya, because they are superior to Kshatriya, in ancient history they held the title of Karanam or Niyogi Brahmins and Gaudas are treated as Vaishya due to engaged in diary farming.

However, we can't write joinly that KC. Panigrahi mentioned evidences both from Madala Panji and Srijanga inscription. Both are different evidence, where srijanga inscription not mentioned about their caste. So it's needs a another column. I expect, you can understand. Thanks P.sitansu (talk) 02:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]