User talk:Pokechu22

Welcome

Hello Pokechu22, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Pokechu22, good luck, and have fun. – —Darkwind (talk) 23:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Regarding your comment at WP:AIV

Hi there! Just so you know, commenting at WP:AIV isn't generally necessary. The admin reviewing each report is going to look at the user's recent contributions and talk page anyway, so it's almost never necessary to comment there. It's one of the few noticeboards we have that doesn't involve much (if any) discussion. —Darkwind (talk) 23:27, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

New page patrol

When you tag a new page for cleanup or deletion, like you did with REEEEEEEE, please make sure it is also mark as reviewed. Thanks. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 03:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Ah, ok. I actually wasn't in that view when I nominated it (and didn't see the button). I'll do that in the future, thanks! --Pokechu22 (talk) 03:16, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

188.31.7.154's talk page

Hi, I noticed that you recently reverted the IP's edit(s) on thei talk page. Per WP:REMOVED, "Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of material from a user page is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents. There is no need to keep them on display and usually users should not be forced to do so.". Per WP:OWNTALK, "Although archiving is preferred, users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages. Users may also remove some conten". There was no reason to edit war for restoring the warnings when the IP didn't want to keep them. Please keep this in mind next time. Callmemirela {Talk} ♑ 18:31, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! I was actually trying to find what policies there were relating to blanking talk pages a few minutes ago (but was unable to do so). I'll keep that in mind in the future. --Pokechu22 (talk) 18:35, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Good job, though

Hi there! I ended up checking your talk page after a user mistakenly wrote to me instead of you (probably because they somehow clicked on my talk link from the welcome message I left you, or something). Anyway, I noticed that so far all we've done is to tell you what you're doing wrong -- so I just wanted to encourage you not to let that get to you. Wikipedia can be an incredibly complex place to volunteer your time, and I hope that we're not scaring you off or anything. Please feel free to ask me any questions you have (and don't forget to {{ping}} me if you write here). —Darkwind (talk) 23:21, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Wasp (comics)

I'm not so sure that User:69.123.55.110 edited the article to address the overly detailed message. The content was moved without attribution to Janet van Dyne. Attribution is necessary per WP:COPYWITHIN. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:16, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

@JJMC89: Hm. That's more complicated than most of the stuff I've been dealing with. I don't think the template-based replies cover that; do you think you can explain to @69.123.55.110 what exactly needs to be done? (I'm not exactly sure either) --Pokechu22 (talk) 05:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

The issue needs to be discussed at Talk:Wasp (comics). In order to do what 69.123.55.110 was doing, Wasp (comics) would need to be moveed to Janet van Dyne for the page history to remain intact. Consensus needs to be obtained first though. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 18:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Himachal Pradesh

The previous statement about cereals didn't have a source. It is very well known that hashish cultivation is important in Himachal Pradesh. In particular, I am suspicious about an article which states an Indian region is very prosperous, relatively, based solely on hydroelectric dams, tourism and agriculture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.15.31.145 (talk) 02:06, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Alright, I guess it probably is accurate. It still would be helpful to find a source. A quick search makes it seem likely, but I don't really know enough about that subject to make full decisions. As for the statement on cereals, it is sourced in the main article, Economy of Himachal Pradesh. I've copied over that source to the main article. --Pokechu22 (talk) 02:22, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Oops, forgot to add a ping. Should give you a notification now. @151.15.31.145: --Pokechu22 (talk) 03:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Bangles may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• = TheBangles.com}}</ref><ref>[http://www.musicgeekmedia.com/?p=176] {{Dead link|date=August 2010}} {{cbignore}]</ref> The band went on tour in late 2011 in support of it, with dates on the East Coast, Midwest,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pokechu22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pokechu22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pokechu22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Music of Andalusia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Southern

ZymoGenetics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bothel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for citation fix

Thank you for your citation fix on one of the articles I was working on for my university assignment. I had much trouble trying to fix this issue and my university teachers were quite confused with the problem too. I've finished the editting the article now but you've saved me a lot of headache as I am very new to Wikipedia editing. Thank you again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lche0142 (talk • contribs) 04:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Glad to help, @Lche0142:! Here's an explanation of each problem I fixed in my edit:

1. 97816160822601616082267 isn't a valid ISBN, but actually two separate ISBNs merged together (9781616082260 and 1616082267), both of which mean the same thing (one is the newer ISBN-13, the other is the older ISBN-10; the last digit differs due to different check digit algorithms; more info in the ISBN article). I've been looking for pages with ISBN errors lately (using Category:Pages with ISBN errors) and that's how I spotted the article.
2. The url field needs the protocol to be specified (https:// in this case, but there could be cases where ftp is used for example)
3. The doi field only needs the text after the url, so 10.2968/059001011 instead of https://doi.org/10.2968/059001011. The reference template automatically links it.
4. The date field wants a date formatted per MOS:DATES, which doesn't include slash-based dates.
5. Lastly, The named reference ":0" was defined multiple times with different content happened due to two references having the same name. Help:Cite errors/Cite error references duplicate key explains how that happens, but since you're using the visual editor, I don't think the names show up anywhere. I think that can only be fixed from the source editor (which I did by changing the reference name to :4, which wasn't used by anything else). I don't use the visual editor myself, so there may be a way to set reference names in it that I just don't know of, though.

Hope this helps with any future problems! --Pokechu22 (talk) 05:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

ISBN error

Thanks for the fix on Synonym. It turns out that the ISBN listed on the copyright page of the book didn't include the check digit, though the one printed on the back cover (with the bar code) did. I should have noticed that it was too short! Thanks again, --Macrakis (talk) 14:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

"Django's Gypsies" ISBN problem

Hi Pokechu22, I was interested in your statement and recent edit on the page Gypsy jazz:

• Ian Cruickshank (1994): Django's Gypsies - The Mystique of Django Reinhardt and His People. Ashley Mark Publishing. ISBN 0-872639-06-2, OCLC 32394702 -- other possible ISBNs are 1-872639-06-2 and 0-87263-906-1 but these do not give results on WorldCat --

I believe I added that ISBN from my personal copy that I have in front of me. The same ISBN is given on the copyright page and also the back cover (with spaces instead of dashes, same in both places). I must confess it never occurs to me to wonder whether the printed number is correct, I just write what I see! Thanks for checking. So in this case do we presume that the printed one is incorrect, or maybe that it was never registered? New area for me... Regards Tony 1212 (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

@Tony 1212: If it's the one that's printed on there, it's probably fine. ISBNs have a check digit that's designed to detect typos, but sometimes the publisher makes a mistake with it. {{isbn}} performs a check on these and adds pages to Category:Pages with ISBN errors if the check digit doesn't match; I've been keeping watch on that category lately. Normally I try to check them with Google Books, but Django's Gypsies doesn't have a scan there (only two catalog entries). If you've got the book and can confirm that the ISBN is that one, then there isn't anything else that needs to be done (the invalid1=yes parameter moves the page into Category:Pages with listed invalid ISBNs, and I added a link to WorldCat for convenience). Hopefully that helps :) --Pokechu22 (talk) 19:49, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Well, actually, there is one other thing to do; I've been recently making note of such invalid ISBNs over on the Open Library; since you have this book, it might help if you could fill in additional data for its record there (that I just created). --Pokechu22 (talk) 19:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Pokechu22, I do not have a login for Open Library, probably do not want one :) but I can confirm the book's dimensions - A4 (30 x 21 cm nominal). There is a description of the book on the inside cover etc. but it is probably copyright - same on other sites (Amazon or wherever), so probably best not to copy this in... Cheers Tony Tony 1212 (talk) 20:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Description on Amazon here - although you have probably already visited that page. I don't know where their stated date of 1997 comes from, though, possibly a reprint or just an error. Cheers Tony Tony 1212 (talk) 23:05, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your help on ISBN problems

Thanks for helping with the ISBN numbers. I am a *real* stickler for accuracy, and insist that at least the numbers are accurate. 170.75.140.124 (talk) 23:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Internazionale (magazine) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Internazionale (magazine), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

@Mccapra: I don't plan on improving that draft. If there's a way to delete it, I'm fine with it, since the only content is my own rough translation from French (though the only one I see in WP:CSD is after letting it languish 6 months; it doesn't fit under X2 since it's not a pure machine translation). I only created it to resolve a dead link next to some other error in an article. For whatever reason, I do see two citations on Internazionale (disambiguation), though. --Pokechu22 (talk) 17:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Thanks for creating the categories! (I'm beat after so much tagging so I'm glad I can take a break now ) — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 02:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: Glad to help! I saw it added to one page and realized that it would probably be a massive pain to create them after the fact if there wasn't a list of them, so I made sure to create them as you added them. And thanks for tagging the pages; they'll probably be helpful. --Pokechu22 (talk) 02:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Ledger Art

Hi Pokechu22, I see that you tagged a citation I added to Ledger art for "failed verification". While you may not be able to verify via online resources, I happen to own a hard copy of the book in my private library. If you do not believe me, I can post an image of me holding the actual print book itself in my hands. I will be untagging the "failed verification" tag, and wanted to reach out in advance to let you know I will be doing so. Please do let me know if you want visible verifiable proof that I own the book itself. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 22:11, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Netherzone, the specific thing I failed to verify was that the book used the phrase "ledger art". I was able to find and verify the existence of the book online (and that it seems to be relevant); it just doesn't seem to specifically support the specific statement that "Ledger art is a term for Plains Indian narrative drawing or painting on paper or cloth". (See Template:Failed verification#When to use). The book does seem to be a perfectly appropriate source for other things, and I'd be fine with the citation being moved to a different place (ideally with a page number), or to the further reading section. The plainsledgerart.org reference seems be enough to confirm the term (which I didn't see before), but based on my understanding of MOS:LEADCITE there probably doesn't need to be a citation at all. Hopefully that clarifies things; note that I know nothing about ledger art itself (I've just been doing a search through articles where LCCNs were tagged in a way other than the lccn parameter on {{cite book}}). --Pokechu22 (talk) 22:22, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I've temporarily uploaded a photo of the first page of chapter 1 in the book, to prove I own the book and that the term art and artist is used to describe ledger book drawings. I also move the citation to a different section. I will be deleting the image soon, therefore I would appreciated hearing back that you have seen it. The book is from 1967 and was never digitized online, and I doubt it will be since it is a niche field of history and art history. Also, the book does not have an ISBN number assigned, because I think it's before there were ISBN numbers were invented or widely used. Thanks in advance, and nice meeting you here. Netherzone (talk) 22:59, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the image, Netherzone. I think the source of confusion was that the book actually was digitized (here by the Internet Archive), which is what I was basing my statements off of (I had also added that link into the citation). Entering ledger art in the search box there gives no results, which is what caused me to add the tag. But, as your image shows, the first chapter is titled "The Artist and His Work", so, yeah, it does make sense that it's called ledger art (and that's something that anyone doing more than my quick check would have spotted). Hopefully this clarifies things! --Pokechu22 (talk) 00:31, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

fyi (for your information.)

your name is wrong, it actually pikachu22, fyi, so u can correct it. - sicneryly, mr. moo

p. s. ur welcome :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.177.38 (talk) 05:17, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Emphasis in edit summaries

Hi!

In the edit summary of this edit, you surrounded a word with underscores as a way of emphasizing it, as documented in "Underscore § 'Simulated' underlines in plain-text" as a technique applicable "[i]n plain-text applications ... where emphasis markup is not possible". You many not be aware that underlining is usually possible in edit summaries using the "combining low line", U+0332. Rather than entering in_this_article, you could have used

in t#&x332;h̲i̲s̲ article

which would have yielded "in t̲h̲i̲s̲ article". If you have AutoHotkey, I have suggested a shortcut here, but putting ̲ (or ̲) on your clipboard and inserting it after each letter of "this" isn't much harder.

The technique doesn't work so well with wide letters — m's or capitals. Using this technique, one has to omit underlining letters with descenders. For a word like "this", the technique works well.

Cheers, Peter Brown (talk) 02:59, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@Peter M. Brown: Thanks for the tip! I actually usually use underscores to indicate italics for some reason (I think JIRA's markup triggered the habit and several markdown variants support both underscores and asterisks for italics so I've kept it up). But it's useful to know about this for future edit summaries, and italics vs underline don't have that much of a difference in meaning. One problem I can see happening is that some of my edit summaries get right up to the character limit, and this technique would double the amount of characters for each emphasized word (I'd assume at least), but that's probably not that big of a deal. --Pokechu22 (talk) 03:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

With my AutoHotkey script, I do add one more to the character count for each emphasized letter. But pasting the six-character string ̲ after each letter would increase the character count by six times the number of emphasized letters. (Using ̲ would make it seven times.) This edit summary would have been impossible using this technique. I wondered: isn't there some way of putting the combining low line on the clipboard so that one could just paste it?

Assuming that you have Windows and the numeric keypad, typing Alt+818 using the keypad in Wordpad, followed by Ctrl+A and then Ctrl+C, sets up the clipboard so that one can underline a letter in an edit summary by positioning the cursor right after it and typing Cntl+V. Oddly, this doesn't work so well in non-Wikipedia text, e.g. in Wordpad itself.

Peter Brown (talk) 23:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Internazionale (magazine)

Hello, Pokechu22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Internazionale".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Joshua T. Owen

Yeah, that was an XfDcloser fail as a result of some weirdness that seems to occur when you have redirect markup in an article that also contains article content and wikilinks. I'm in the process of self-reverting the rest of it -_- ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, and that's an odd bug for sure. Quoting what I originally wrote on your talk page, perhaps XFDCloser naively assumes that if a link to an article being deleted is found on a redirect, the redirect targets that article and thus links to that redirect should also be removed (but the redirect itself doesn't need to be deleted?) — it at least seems like a plausible explanation to me. --Pokechu22 (talk) 22:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

That was my guess as well. I imagine it's got to be a super-rare occurrence, since redirects aren't supposed to contain any other content. I'm glad I caught it and was able to self-revert without causing any further noticeable issues. Thanks for fixing the redirect issue on the Chestnut Hill article :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Thanks for your advice on the Plague Doctor Costume talk page!

CharlieCandide (talk) 06:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

hopeful for a help

Hello; I’m about writing my first enwiki page as a page linked to its Persian ones. I’ve read about the policy which may takes 3-4 months for a confirmation. Also this page was deleted for a few times. Now I need some help about the reason of deletion and also to guide me how to make one. BTW the Persian page is ارشا اقدسی. Looking forward to your answer thanks. Atena ak2 (talk) 12:36, 29 April 2021 (UTC)