Jump to content

Talk:Raúl Grijalva: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 7: Line 7:
{{WikiProject Politics |class=Start |importance=Low |liberalism=y |liberalism-importance= |American=y |American-importance=}}
{{WikiProject Politics |class=Start |importance=Low |liberalism=y |liberalism-importance= |American=y |American-importance=}}
}}
}}

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on [[Raúl Grijalva]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/814806018|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090303032717/http://www.nationaljournal.com/njmagazine/cs_20090228_9659.php to http://www.nationaljournal.com/njmagazine/cs_20090228_9659.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 01:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)


== Complaint settlement ==
== Complaint settlement ==

Revision as of 01:10, 1 May 2021

Complaint settlement

A section concerning a financial settlement of a personnel complaint against Grijalva has been added to the article. I'm treating the Washington Times article as a reliable source, but have changed the inflammatory POV title of the article to conform to Wikipedia standards. Tapered (talk) 22:32, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hiding the Justice Democrat affiliation

Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.152.14 (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

24.47.152.14, as you know we are discussing "why" right now on your talk page. Summary is that you claim that Justice Democrats are equivalent to Tea Party which is mentioned in the lead of many politician articles. There is no comparison. For one thing, the Tea Party Caucus is an actual congressional caucus while the Justice Democrats is not. For another the Tea Party has received massive publicity for many years and is virtually a household word; not the case for Justice Democrats. Let's continue to discuss on your talk page so we can settle this in one place for all of the half-dozen members where you want to put this in the lead. -- MelanieN (talk) 17:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]