Talk:Legal technology: Difference between revisions
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
--[[User:Rawwbots|Rawwbots]] ([[User talk:Rawwbots|talk]]) 20:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC) |
--[[User:Rawwbots|Rawwbots]] ([[User talk:Rawwbots|talk]]) 20:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC) |
||
:"defying the purpose of the page itself", the purpose of this article is not to list legal tech companies. Also, someone disagreeing with content is [[Wikipedia:Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals|not vandalism]]. [[User:Greyjoy|'''<span style="color: black">Grey</span><span style="color: DarkGoldenrod">joy</span>''']]<sup> [[User talk:Greyjoy|talk]]</sup> 05:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC) |
:"defying the purpose of the page itself", the purpose of this article is not to list legal tech companies. Also, someone disagreeing with content is [[Wikipedia:Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals|not vandalism]]. [[User:Greyjoy|'''<span style="color: black">Grey</span><span style="color: DarkGoldenrod">joy</span>''']]<sup> [[User talk:Greyjoy|talk]]</sup> 05:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC) |
||
([[User talk:Greyjoy|talk]]) |
|||
Beg to differ. Removing content in view that a reviewer's disagreement remains with agreement to all is purported vandalism.The beginning of legal tech itself was marked by lexis Nexis in 1974 and with the introduction of their [https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/features/evolution-of-the-law-firm-why-clients-demand-that-you-embrace-new-technology little red UBIQ terminal]. Wikipedia's terms clearly state that the wiki site is a directory of its own contents and contents that are relevant to the subject itself. I am of high opinion that the absence of these companies, given their role in the evolution of a rather vague technological segment, had make this article obsolete.≈ |
|||
Revision as of 09:15, 20 May 2021
 | Articles for creation Start‑class  | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Technology Start‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Section removal
An entire section of legal tech companies was deleted in entirety defying the purpose of the page itself. Legal tech is a term popularized by start up companies providing software services to a specific sector and which is clearly specified in the intro text quoted as under:
"Legal Tech companies are often startups founded with the purpose of disrupting the traditionally conservative legal market"
I am in agreement that wikipedia ain't a directory, but will legal tech exist as a whole without these companies promoting it it! This is deliberate vandalism to the subject page itself!! --Rawwbots (talk) 20:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- "defying the purpose of the page itself", the purpose of this article is not to list legal tech companies. Also, someone disagreeing with content is not vandalism. Greyjoy talk 05:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
(talk) Beg to differ. Removing content in view that a reviewer's disagreement remains with agreement to all is purported vandalism.The beginning of legal tech itself was marked by lexis Nexis in 1974 and with the introduction of their little red UBIQ terminal. Wikipedia's terms clearly state that the wiki site is a directory of its own contents and contents that are relevant to the subject itself. I am of high opinion that the absence of these companies, given their role in the evolution of a rather vague technological segment, had make this article obsolete.≈