Talk:Connor Freff Cochran: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:14, 26 May 2021

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 29, 2007	Articles for deletion	Deleted

Biography: Arts and Entertainment Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 4 April 2021 by Fourthords (talk · contribs).

Connorfc (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Beagle case appeal?

In April, Freff appears to have edited his own article a couple of times to remove the Beagle lawsuit material. These removals were rightly reverted per Wikipedia policies. In the first edit (done as an IP, so possibly not him), he said:

The deleted material refers to active, ongoing legal matters that have NOT been concluded, and is deliberately misleading. The ruling it cites is under appeal because it was not based on any evidence, and so far Beagle's lawyers have lost every motion.in the appellate court. Also, the bankruptcy acquisition is being legally challenged.

In the second, done from his (presumably) Connorfc account, he said:

The source being sited is a one-sided PRESS RELEASE, not an accurate factual document. Much of its content is provably false. The legal matter in question is still under appeal and absolutely NOT settled.

I was going to add material about the appeal(s), to partially address Mr. Cochran's concerns, but I tried Googling, going to a few court records websites, etc., and couldn't find anything to establish appeals being in-process. If anyone with more expertise searching for court documents knows how to find those, please post here, or just go ahead and add them. Danke schön. --Dan Harkless (talk) 14:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 | User1   = Connorfc | U1-EH = yes | U1-declared = no |U1-otherlinks = |U1-banned = no
 }}
+== Beagle case appeal? ==
+In April, Freff appears to have edited his own article a couple of times to remove the Beagle lawsuit material.  These removals were rightly reverted per Wikipedia policies.  In the first edit (done as an IP, so ''possibly'' not him), he said:
+: The deleted material refers to active, ongoing legal matters that have NOT been concluded, and is deliberately misleading. The ruling it cites is under appeal because it was not based on any evidence, and so far Beagle's lawyers have lost every motion.in the appellate court. Also, the bankruptcy acquisition is being legally challenged.
+In the second, done from his (presumably) [[User:Connorfc |Connorfc]] account, he said:
+: The source being sited is a one-sided PRESS RELEASE, not an accurate factual document. Much of its content is provably false. The legal matter in question is still under appeal and absolutely NOT settled.
+I was going to add material about the appeal(s), to partially address Mr. Cochran's concerns, but I tried Googling, going to a few court records websites, etc., and couldn't find anything to establish appeals being in-process.  If anyone with more expertise searching for court documents knows how to find those, please post here, or just go ahead and add them.  Danke schön.  --[[User:Dan Harkless|Dan Harkless]] ([[User talk:Dan Harkless|talk]]) 14:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)