Jump to content

User talk:Mr. Pekka Stranker: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 12:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)}}
Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 12:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)}}


{{unblock|My reason is: just as what I've said, I'll avoid such actions done earlier. Furthermore on what I've addressed, I understand that I was wrong with the sockpuppetry in this matter. To better myself as an editor, I won't continue to cause damage or disruption again and will contribute usefully and appropriately.}}
{{unblock|My reason is: just as what I've said, I'll avoid such actions done earlier. Furthermore on what I've addressed, I understand that I was wrong with the sockpuppetry in this matter and I will share contributions based on the Wikipedia Rules. To better myself as an editor, I won't continue to cause damage or disruption again and will contribute usefully and appropriately.}}

Revision as of 03:03, 3 June 2021

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr. Pekka Stranker. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ST47 (talk) 18:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr. Pekka Stranker (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My reason is: I'll avoid such actions done earlier, acknowledging, understanding and recognizing the reason of this given situation. I will continue to make and practice more productive contributions instead, with appropriate relevancy and refraining from these again. Hoping to take action of this as I'll do better.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mr. Pekka Stranker (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My reason is: just as what I've said, I'll avoid such actions done earlier. Furthermore on what I've addressed, I understand that I was wrong with the sockpuppetry in this matter and I will share contributions based on the Wikipedia Rules. To better myself as an editor, I won't continue to cause damage or disruption again and will contribute usefully and appropriately.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My reason is: just as what I've said, I'll avoid such actions done earlier. Furthermore on what I've addressed, I understand that I was wrong with the sockpuppetry in this matter and I will share contributions based on the Wikipedia Rules. To better myself as an editor, I won't continue to cause damage or disruption again and will contribute usefully and appropriately. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=My reason is: just as what I've said, I'll avoid such actions done earlier. Furthermore on what I've addressed, I understand that I was wrong with the sockpuppetry in this matter and I will share contributions based on the Wikipedia Rules. To better myself as an editor, I won't continue to cause damage or disruption again and will contribute usefully and appropriately. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=My reason is: just as what I've said, I'll avoid such actions done earlier. Furthermore on what I've addressed, I understand that I was wrong with the sockpuppetry in this matter and I will share contributions based on the Wikipedia Rules. To better myself as an editor, I won't continue to cause damage or disruption again and will contribute usefully and appropriately. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}