Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Christians: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:49, 9 June 2021

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. See Talk:Free Christians (Britain)#Requested move for discussion about what to do with the title. --BDD (talk) 00:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Free Christians

I am nominating the article Free Christians for deletion as it has been deemed to be a hoax article by several Wikipedia users. See here for more info. --Devin Murphy (talk) 19:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE It doesn't seem to be notable to begin with, but if it is a hoax (as it appears), it ought to be speedy deleted under CSD G3.--ColonelHenry (talk) 20:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - even if it is not a hoax (the World Christian Encyclopedia reference seems to be genuine), this is almost entirely original research. St Anselm (talk) 20:33, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. --BDD (talk) 20:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect. There is a body called General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches, but there is Free Christians (Britain) for them. This article seems not to be restricted to them or any particular group. It says things about various groups of independent churches, which (i) are not individually notable, and (ii) by definition do not have an over-arching organisation.The external links seem to be to unrelated independent groups. The page nondenominational Christianity is sufficient; all that this page could be is a content fork, so a new redirect to that page should be created after deletion. – Fayenatic London 12:15, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would point also to the fact that the article seems to be almost entirely the creation of a single account, and is also original research as stated above. --gilgongo (talk) 13:48, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (or redirect, if a suitable target can be identified). The contnet is so amorphous that I cannot work out what it is about. A redirect to General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches would certainly be wrong, as the article claims they adhere to a creed that is explicitly Trinitarian. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *'''Delete''' - even if it is not a hoax (the ''[[World Christian Encyclopedia]]'' reference seems to be genuine), this is almost entirely original research. [[User:StAnselm|<b>St</b>]][[Special:Contributions/StAnselm|Anselm]] ([[User talk:StAnselm|talk]]) 20:33, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Christianity|list of Christianity-related deletion discussions]]. --[[User:BDD|BDD]] ([[User talk:BDD|talk]]) 20:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC)</small>
-*'''Delete and redirect'''. There is a body called [[General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches]], but there is [[Free Christians (Britain)]] for them. This article seems not to be restricted to them or any particular group. It says things about various groups of independent churches, which (i) are not individually notable, and (ii) by definition do not have an over-arching organisation.The external links seem to be to unrelated independent groups. The page [[nondenominational Christianity]] is sufficient; all that this page could be is a [[WP:CFORK| content fork]], so a new redirect to that page should be created after deletion. – [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] '''<font color="#FF0000">[[Special:Contributions/Fayenatic london|L]]</font>'''[[User talk:Fayenatic london|ondon]] 12:15, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
+*'''Delete and redirect'''. There is a body called [[General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches]], but there is [[Free Christians (Britain)]] for them. This article seems not to be restricted to them or any particular group. It says things about various groups of independent churches, which (i) are not individually notable, and (ii) by definition do not have an over-arching organisation.The external links seem to be to unrelated independent groups. The page [[nondenominational Christianity]] is sufficient; all that this page could be is a [[WP:CFORK| content fork]], so a new redirect to that page should be created after deletion. – [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] '''[[Special:Contributions/Fayenatic london|<span style="color:#FF0000;">L</span>]]'''[[User talk:Fayenatic london|ondon]] 12:15, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''. I would point also to the fact that the article seems to be almost entirely the creation of a single account, and is also original research as stated above. --[[User:Gilgongo|gilgongo]] ([[User talk:Gilgongo|talk]]) 13:48, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' (or redirect, if a suitable target can be identified).  The contnet is so amorphous that I cannot work out what it is about.  A redirect to [[General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches]] would certainly be wrong, as the article claims they adhere to a creed that is explicitly Trinitarian.  [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 14:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)