Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacha Stone: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Sacha Stone.
 
update
Line 5: Line 5:
:{{la|Sacha Stone}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacha Stone|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 10#{{anchorencode:Sacha Stone}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:{{la|Sacha Stone}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacha Stone|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 10#{{anchorencode:Sacha Stone}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Sacha Stone}})
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Sacha Stone}})
Non notable, lot or original research sources seems to passing in mention of one or two news and unrealiable sources like buzz feed or to be from primary sources like court orders, as per WP:SINGLEEVENT, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:SYNTHESIS and non notable [[User:Shrikanthv|Shrikanthv]] ([[User talk:Shrikanthv|talk]]) 07:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Non notable, lot or original research sources seems to mention in passing from one or two news adding to unrealiable sources like buzz feed or to be from primary sources like court orders, as per WP:SINGLEEVENT, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:SYNTHESIS and non notable [[User:Shrikanthv|Shrikanthv]] ([[User talk:Shrikanthv|talk]]) 07:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:11, 10 June 2021

Sacha Stone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, lot or original research sources seems to mention in passing from one or two news adding to unrealiable sources like buzz feed or to be from primary sources like court orders, as per WP:SINGLEEVENT, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:SYNTHESIS and non notable Shrikanthv (talk) 07:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]