User talk:Tingle: Difference between revisions
Proposed deletion of So, Now You Know.... (TW) |
Notification: proposed deletion of GeekBrief.TV. |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Robofish|Robofish]] ([[User talk:Robofish|talk]]) 23:33, 19 April 2010 (UTC) |
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Robofish|Robofish]] ([[User talk:Robofish|talk]]) 23:33, 19 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:GeekBrief.TV]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:GeekBrief.TV]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
<blockquote>'''This podcast does not meet [[WP:GNG]]. A Google News search turns up a few very brief mentions of the podcast by lesser known or questionable sources such as labnol.org and areyouscreening.com with the most notable sources being tomsguide.com and thetyee.ca, however, none of these dedicate more than a sentence to the podcast. Neal Campbell, one of the cohosts, wrote for SocialNewsDaily.com a few times so random articles from that site shows up in Google searches, but none of those actually contain information about the podcast. The podcast itself has been inactive for over a decade and it's extremely unlikely to generate further news coverage.'''</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:GeekBrief.TV|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:TipsyElephant|TipsyElephant]] ([[User talk:TipsyElephant|talk]]) 12:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:45, 14 June 2021
The article So, Now You Know... has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable book: no evidence of notability, and I'm unable to find any coverage of it in independent reliable sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robofish (talk) 23:33, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
The article GeekBrief.TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This podcast does not meet WP:GNG. A Google News search turns up a few very brief mentions of the podcast by lesser known or questionable sources such as labnol.org and areyouscreening.com with the most notable sources being tomsguide.com and thetyee.ca, however, none of these dedicate more than a sentence to the podcast. Neal Campbell, one of the cohosts, wrote for SocialNewsDaily.com a few times so random articles from that site shows up in Google searches, but none of those actually contain information about the podcast. The podcast itself has been inactive for over a decade and it's extremely unlikely to generate further news coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TipsyElephant (talk) 12:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)