User talk:Nyanardsan

HMS Triton (1796)

Hi, why did you move Draft: HMS Triton (1796) to HMS Triton (1796)? It is no where near finished and I believe needs to stay in draft form for a while longer. Many thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 02:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

@Pickersgill-Cunliffe: I apologize if it makes you uncomfortable, I thought the draft was already sufficient enough to be an article and you dont mind editing it as an article. Im sorry if it makes you uncomfortable or violates Wikipedia guidelines. Nyanardsan (talk) 02:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

@Nyanardsan: Not a huge problem, but as of now the article is missing the entire first half and I think that's way too much for it to be considered a complete article. For now I think it would be better if it stayed in draft form. Many thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 02:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Okay, I apologize for that. I promise I wont do such a thing later. Nyanardsan (talk) 02:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Invite

Please accept this invitation to join the Tropical cyclones WikiProject (WPTC), a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with tropical cyclones. WPTC hosts some of Wikipedia's highest-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming cyclone season. Simply click here to accept!

HurricaneEdgar 02:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Cyclone Seroja

On 5 April 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cyclone Seroja, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. HurricaneEdgar 14:51, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

@HurricaneEdgar: It's not even posted yet... --Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 15:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for your quick and swift reaction of creating articles in response to current events in Wikipedia. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 01:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Banjarbaru, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martapura. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Banjarbaru

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Banjarbaru you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bsoyka -- Bsoyka (talk) 03:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much for reviewing it. Please take your time as long as you need~ I will patiently wait and actively edit the article in accordance of the review if needed. Nyanardsan (talk) 03:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Just saw this – you're so welcome, and I'm happy I can help! You wrote 85% of that article so I'm sure you care about it a lot. You've put a lot of effort into it and I'm happy to help get it the recognition it deserves. Bsoyka🗣️ 04:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Banjarbaru

The article Banjarbaru you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Banjarbaru for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bsoyka -- Bsoyka (talk) 04:00, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Banjarbaru

The article Banjarbaru you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Banjarbaru for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bsoyka -- Bsoyka (talk) 06:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

And you're a GA contributor too! A blessing for the project! To see quality for Indonesia is wonderful! † Encyclopædius 07:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thanks for working to create and expand many articles about Indonesia-related topics! EpicPupper (talk) 21:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much~ Nyanardsan (talk) 21:48, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Tarakan

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Tarakan has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the CE~ Nyanardsan (talk) 03:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

On edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision diffs
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! EpicPupper (talk) 22:16, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for your work on Indonesia! Keep it up! What you're doing I wanted to see ten years ago but we didn't have anybody working on regencies and towns in Indonesia! I tried to create a foundation in the early days on here for different countries and set it on its way! Terima kasih! † Encyclopædius 07:46, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks ^^ I'll do my best to continue expanding regencies & cities article Nyanardsan (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Appealing rejection of Jasjeet S. Sekhon

I'm writing to appeal the rejection of my draft article for Jasjeet S. Sekhon. He meets the criteria for notability for academics laid out on Wikipedia's Notability (academics) page. In particular, Sekhon meets criteria #3 (he is a fellow of the American Statistical Association) and objectively meets #5 (he holds a named endowed chair at Yale University, the Eugene Meyer chair). I have edited the page to note both of these. Regarding the latter, the Wikipedia notability criteria do not ask for us to judge how distinguished the chair is. It simply says " a named chair appointment," which he holds. I apologize for not noting these in my original submission.

--1armbanidt (talk) 09:22, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Nyanardsan, I've undone the rejection. I haven't reviewed the full article, but notability is clearly not an issue here. --Blablubbs|talk 11:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I've now accepted the article. --Blablubbs|talk 12:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I apologize, this is my mistake. Sorry for rejecting the article. Nyanardsan (talk) 18:07, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Negro in Business has been accepted

The Negro in Business, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:04, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Bank Kaltimtara moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bank Kaltimtara, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:00, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bank Kaltimtara has been accepted

Bank Kaltimtara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nyanardsan (talk) 06:08, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Request on 10:46:43, 15 June 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by NastyaAlisina

• NastyaAlisina (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Appery.io (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! My draft for Appery.io's page was declined due to a lack of independent sources. However, the current list of references has 20 sources. All of them are independent ones and are not owned or managed by the product development company Exadel. Can you please double-check this part or provide more specifics about why the current sources do not work? Another reason for declining the draft that was mentioned is that the article partially sounds like an advertisement rather than an entry in the encyclopedia. I have edited several sections to make them sound neutral, please check.

NastyaAlisina (talk) 10:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)