User talk:Prolix

Cambridge University Study

Hello Prolix,

as part of a field experiment for a Cambridge University study, we undertook several edits on various Wikipedia pages over the past months.

You were one of the users reacting to an edit we made, precisely: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Rosneft&diff=986864803&oldid=986837938

It would be extremely helpful for our study if you could explain why you decided to challenge this edit. Feel free to comment on this talk page or write us an email at WikipediaStudy@web.de.

We are also more than happy to have a short interview of around 15 minutes, in which we would further talk about your general experiences and motivations as a Wikipedia editor. The interviews have received approval from the Ethics Committee of the University of Cambridge and it will be ensured that you can stay completely anonymous.

We are looking forward to hearing from you soon and are glad to provide more information about the study if you send us an email!

Best wishes,

Vincent 2.247.245.243 (talk) 11:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wipro logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wipro logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Checking with you

Dear Prolix, it has been a long time since we communicated. We're getting the news about India and the current covid situation. I hope you are safe and healthy. Sending healing prayers from Seagrove. - Hatchens (talk) 09:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Request to remove World Children Peace Prize 2019 from Licypriya Kangujam's list of awards

World Children Peace Prize 2019 Licypriya received, was arranged fraudulently by her father KK Singh and his organization IYC.

Global Peace Index had clarified on Twitter, that "| Director of Partnerships Charles Allen was asked to present the award which was conferred by the event organisers. We do not issue awards, and do not have an award program in place."

According to The Print - "Among the controversial awards are ‘The World Children Peace Prize’, given to Licypriya in 2019 by a Maldivian organisation whose founder Aishath Rafiyya is the vice-president in the IYC’s executive council and chairman is KK Singh (Licypriya's father)". KK Singh has a history of forging awards and events, with UN like accreditation. Her father is arrested in one such case, and was absconding since 2016.

The PR statement (Refer footer) about this award was issued by Licypriya's NGO "The Child Movement", via her guardians to various news outlets.

Its a humble request, if you can look into this. I'm not making the edit, as still I'm a novice on this.

Do take a read on this:

- https://theprint.in/india/un-like-events-awards-fraud-forgery-murky-world-of-9-yr-old-activist-licypriyas-dad/669229/

- https://www.thequint.com/news/india/how-a-dubious-crowdfund-was-started-in-licypriya-kangujams-name#read-more

- https://www.vice.com/en/article/5db9yk/licypriya-father-of-indias-greta-thunberg-arrest-scam

- https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/is-indias-greta-thunberg-a-pawn-in-the-hands-of-an-unscrupulous-father/articleshow/83277443.cms

- https://twitter.com/mohuadazzTOI/status/1401383869845282821 (Readable link to the TOI article)

Ndinux (talk) 09:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Bluebell Group draft review

Hi Prolix, I hope you are well. I am checking in on the review for the Bluebell Group draft, first submitted in January. This was reviewed mainly by Hatchens, with some inputs from AafiOnMobile. Hatchens helped resubmit on 24 February, but I couldn't find the article in the list of articles for review. Hatchens mentioned you would be able to advise, so I thought I would follow up directly. Thanks in advance for any guidance you can offer on how to get the article reviewed! Gregocole (talk) 11:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)