Talk:Re-evaluation counseling: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:54, 21 June 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Re-evaluation counseling article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Scientology Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

correct 'Re-evalulation' to 'Re-evaluation'

In the fourth paragraph of the 'Ideas' section, change 'Re-evalulation' to 'Re-evaluation'. (I can't do it as the page is locked) Dccu-anna (talk) 08:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Re-evaluation Counseling (organization). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Re-evaluation Counseling (organization). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2018

This edit request to Re-evaluation Counseling (organization) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Replace the Re-evaluation Counseling Glossary link in the External Links section at the end of the article with the following link from the official Re-evaluation Counseling organization website:

  https://www.rc.org/page/publication/guidelines/glossary Bluewater02 (talk) 00:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Gulumeemee (talk) 04:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2018

This edit request to Re-evaluation Counseling (organization) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change URL for Reference #12 to point to the actual Guidelines at: https://www.rc.org/publication/guidelines_2017/contents Bluewater02 (talk) 12:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Sam Sailor 17:23, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2018

This edit request to Re-evaluation Counseling (organization) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change URL for Reference #11 to the actual RC Theory description at: https://www.rc.org/publication/theory/about Bluewater02 (talk) 13:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Sam Sailor 17:23, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2018

This edit request to Re-evaluation Counseling (organization) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Remove reference #1 which is a dead link. No other link to this document is available. Bluewater02 (talk) 16:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Works fine for me. Sam Sailor 17:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2018

This edit request to Re-evaluation Counseling (organization) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The last sentence in the History section should read as follows:

After Jackins' death in 1999, his son, Tim Jackins, was chosen at the World Conference of RC leaders, to assume the role as International Reference Person. Bluewater02 (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 June 2018

This edit request to Re-evaluation Counseling (organization) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please disregard the proposed change form 2018 Jun 23, and replace with the following.

Change the last line of the History section: "After Jackins' death in 1999, his son, Tim Jackins, was chosen at a conference, attended by leaders in the RC communities worldwide, to take over the role of International Liberation Reference Person, the title given to the leader(s) of RC."

to:

"After Jackins' death in 1999, his son, Tim Jackins, the Alternate International Reference Person, assumed the role of International Liberation Reference Person." Bluewater02 (talk) 16:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — LeoFrank ^Talk 18:14, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent bias in article

I haven't read all the talk on this article, but it seems to me that there's something odd about starting the History section with accusations of plagiarism. Would it be possible to reframe those opening paragraphs so that Jackins's version of the beginnings of the organisation came first, with criticism of it, including the references to Dianetics, coming later. Scientology's longstanding hostility to Re-evaluation Counseling make it seem even odder to put the historic connection front and centre.

A quick look at the references in these first paragraphs shows that it is mostly disgruntled former members of the organisation who are sources. Is this sound practice.

Can someone advise me what course of action I might take, given that this is a semi-protected page, and it seems that almost any change provokes controversy. (Shawjonathan (talk) 07:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC))[reply]

§

Mr. Shaw, I cannot advise you on what course of action to take since I am new to wikipedia editing myself, but I do agree that this rendition of the rc organization is distorted in the ways you mention and also is too abridged in terms of it's other representations, such as omitting the NGO Sustaining All Life. Are you concerned that making changes in the face of controversy would turn into a personal time sink? I know I do not have unlimited time to parse out such objections, myself. Preston.stanke (talk) 23:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

§

I would have to agree with Mr. Shaw regarding the slant of the article. Although this is a semi-protected article, I expect edits with attention to this discussion would be a good starting point. Bluewater02 (talk) 13:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 March 2021

This edit request to Re-evaluation Counseling has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove the link at the bottom of the page to Cherie Brown and the National Coalition Building Institute (NCBI). NCBI is inaccurately described as a project of Reevaluation Counseling. It is not. For verification, see www.ncbi.org. You may also contact the NCBI Board of Directors at info@ncbi.org. Lincoln319 (talk) 21:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All set, thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 103: / Line 103: @@
 Can someone advise me what course of action I might take, given that this is a semi-protected page, and it seems that almost any change provokes controversy. ([[User:Shawjonathan|Shawjonathan]] ([[User talk:Shawjonathan|talk]]) 07:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC))
+§
 Mr. Shaw, I cannot advise you on what course of action to take since I am new to wikipedia editing myself, but I do agree that this rendition of the rc organization is distorted in the ways you mention and also is too abridged in terms of it's other representations, such as omitting the NGO Sustaining All Life. Are you concerned that making changes in the face of controversy would turn into a personal time sink? I know I do not have unlimited time to parse out such objections, myself. [[User:Preston.stanke|Preston.stanke]] ([[User talk:Preston.stanke|talk]]) 23:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
+§
+I would have to agree with Mr. Shaw regarding the slant of the article. Although this is a semi-protected article, I expect edits with attention to this discussion would be a good starting point.
+[[User:Bluewater02|Bluewater02]] ([[User talk:Bluewater02|talk]]) 13:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 == Semi-protected edit request on 19 March 2021 ==