User talk:KylieTastic

It is approximately 11:55 PM where this user lives (Cambridge, UK).

I try to answer all questions, but I also have a busy real-life - If you have a general question it may be quicker to ask at the Wikipedia:Teahouse

Click to start a Question/section — Deleted image issue? Look up the files history here...

AfC Drafts NOTE: To be fair to all submitters I do not review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random... Current Backlog: 1,797 pending submissions

 

Declination of Marcus Chow

Hi KylieTastic, I am MarkieC07. I am inquiring regarding the declination of a recent draft I created on 25th May 2021, Marcus Chow. For your information, I followed the same format of A. Blomqvist's Wikipedia Page (https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._Blomqvist), but I don't understand why my draft can't get accepted but his draft went through. Marcus Chow and A. Blomqvist are both artists on Spotify. Can you kindly explain the reasoning? MarkieC07 (talk) 17:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

• Hi MarkieC07, each language Wikipedia has there own policies and guidelines - in general it appears that the more articles there are the stricter to the concept of encyclopedic content is applied. Your article has a single Spotify source that only shows the artist exists, not that they are 'notable'. See WP:MUSICBIO for the criteria for music notability, or WP:GNG for general notability. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 17:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

• Alright, noted with thanks, KylieTastic! MarkieC07 (talk) 10:04, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Draft Declined

Dear KylieTastic, I was able to improve errors on draft. You are more friendly than the rest of the editors who deleted my articles on Wikipedia. I need someone to help out on my wiikipedia page. Can you help me out? I have been new to wikipedia for only a month. With Care, Osvaldo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osvaldo2007 (talk • contribs)

• Hi Osvaldo2007 if others have appeared unkind it is probably not personal but just that a lot of regular editors have to deal with endless vandalism, promotion and huge backlogs of work so sometimes forget others are new and many trying there best. All editors are expected to be civil (see our Wikipedia:Civility policy) and Assume good faith. As for Draft:Mexican Criminal Investigation Agency all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). You currently only have one source, so look for others to add. Hope that helps. And don't forget the Wikipedia:Teahouse is there for new editors to ask for advice from many experienced editors. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 20:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Dear kylieTastic, thank you for advice. There was this issue were I got blocked from editing Fandom wiki (The Walking Dead wiki) 2 weeks ago by some guy called DalesRV. Can I get blocked on wikipedia or is there a different policy? With Concern, Osvaldo

• Hi Osvaldo2007 yes many people do get blocked from editing Wikipedia but apart from extreme cases users are warned 1-4 times before a block. However this would be for behaviour such as vandalism, repeated unexplained removal of content, advertising, using multiple accounts, etc.... so for most editors who are here to build an encyclopedia and acting in good faith there is no worry about being blocked. I don't know anything about how fandom is run so I can't comment on that. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 21:25, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, KylieTastic. Also, can you re-check and approve my draft? I fixed all errors and added more detail. also, I had a problem last night were my article Mexican Federal Investigation Agency was redirected into Federal Ministerial Police. Is there a way I can prevent this from happening again? The guy who did it was an wiki administrator. How can I become administrator to prevent this?

• Hi Osvaldo2007 as I said before: all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS), you still only have a single source. If an admin reverted your edit I would suggest talking to them on there talk page. As for becoming an admin involves lots of editing to show you understand policy then see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 19:06, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Kylie. Since you are from the UK im doing a little reasearch about the troubles that happened in northern ireland from the 60s to 90s. is there any reliable history website?

• Hi Osvaldo2007 I'm not aware of any, history is not really my thing and the Northern Ireland situation has always been a mess with no easy fix. I would start by looking at the sources used in The Troubles. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 08:15, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Kylie. I was able to fix the draft. Can you check to resubmit please? I already used sources. That was all the was available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osvaldo2007 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Unsourced

I was creating this wiki: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Draft:Empires_of_the_Undergrowth

It was declined twice. I was told it is unsourced. What exactly does it mean? And what do I have to do? Can you kindly please tell. Shaon2007 (talk) 11:46, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

• Hi Shaon2007 it means content on Wikipedia has to be backed by sources that are independent and reliable. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources for more of a description of what sources to use, and Help:Referencing for beginners for how to add them. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 11:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

For a game wiki, is game website link, developer's website link, and steam link to download the game not enough as sources? What else is needed? Shaon2007 (talk) 05:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

• Hi Shaon2007 no those are not independent, they just show that the game exists, if that was enough anyone could create an article about anything. That is not an encyclopedia that would we social media. All new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). See Wikipedia:Notability (video games) for what is looked for for notability of a video game. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 09:12, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Spirit of Cascia

Kylie Tastic,

thank you for your efforts in approving my other article entitled "Project Schoolflight" and for a C-Class rating! since you are so aware of that subject matter, could you then review and approve a related article- "Spirit of Cascia" - the Baby Ace airplane that was the 1st airplane built in that project makes it very notable and it is awaiting review approval just as was "Project Schoolflight" and your background now with project schoolflight could be invaluable for cruising through the approval for "Spirit of Cascia". It is fully referenced as was project schoolflight Thankk you RDBACE1 (talk) 04:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

• Hi RDBACE1 happy to approve - it makes a change as less than 18% of reviews are approvals, we get a lot of junk submissions. However to be fair to all submitters I don't review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random, so it may or may not be myself who reviews it next. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 09:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Midcoast Community Council

Kylie Tastic,

Thanks for looking at this new page. So I can better understand for future editing, why was this paragraph removed?

   The councilmembers as a whole can be reached via  [1]. 

— Preceding unsigned comment added by DaveOlson-EG (talk • contribs)

• Hi DaveOlson-EG because it is not encyclopedic content to give out contact details per WP:NOTDIRECTORY - putting "The councilmembers as a whole can be reached via..." is something you would have on the council webite, or social media. Also per Wikipedia:External links we do not have inline external links in the article, either links are sources in ref tags or go in the external links section. As it already has a link to midcoastcommunitycouncil.org readers can use that to go find more information including contact info etc I just removed. Hope that makes sense. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 15:15, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Reviewing an article

Hi,

Please can you review again this page after I added credible and different sources:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:High-Level_Panel_on_Digital_Cooperation#Reviewing_an_article

Best,

• Hi Miketheil I didn't review the first time, I just tidied the ref format, and to be fair to all submitters I don't review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random, so it may or may not be myself who reviews it next. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 09:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-25

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• The otrs-member group name is now vrt-permissions. This could affect abuse filters. [2]

Problems

• You will be able to read but not edit German Wikipedia, English Wikivoyage and 29 smaller wikis for a few minutes on 22 June. This is planned between 5:00 and 5:30 UTC. [3]

Changes later this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 22 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 23 June. It will be on all wikis from 24 June (calendar).

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

hi my draft was declined

i created draft page of my village n declined as mentioned source is not verified by i m the resident i know my village and verify it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSomal (talk • contribs)

• Hi GSomal that's not how Wikipedia works - that's how social media works. We need verifiable sources, not personal declarations. All new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 21:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Dhruv_Gogia

Hi KylieTastic, I don't understand why my draft Draft:Dhruv_Gogia is getting rejected for the second time. I am a verified artist with a decent following, I also have a notable presence all around. I have specifically cited and used relevant information according to Wikipedia standards. Can you suggest what should I add or delete in order for it to get accepted. You can verify my socials and internet presence. Cheers, Dhruv! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biography.mans (talk • contribs)

• Hi Biography.mans all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS) - See Wikipedia:Notability (people) for what the criteria are. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 11:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

• Awesome KylieTastic, if you could just take your time and go through the little matter presented on the page you'd know that it falls under a: received a notable award, b: has a large fan base or a siginificant "cult" following. If you'd like, there's a lot more to add however I want to first get the page rolling and then further edit as time passes. I hope you understand and will look into it. It's quite urgent to get it done. cheers, Dhruv.

Studio Montagne

Hello, why don't you validate the article on the Mountain Studio?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albéric Langard (talk • contribs) 14:58, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

• Hi Albéric Langard all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). You have no sources, let alone significant coverage in multiple independent reliable ones. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 18:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

decline of article again

this is unfair way u r mentioning that the way i have submitted the article is the was social media work, now tell me how can cite my village in India, i is hard to cite a rural village and u r doing unfair thing by not letting people of village not sharing wikipedia platform which is free for everybody and moreover according to u would i need to post pictures of sepoy surinder singh statue which is made outside our village in his memory of his valour for the country. he died fighting terrorists, then u would call it verified source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSomal (talk • contribs)

• GSomal I did not say you had submitted like social media but that Wikipedia requires reliable sources not what individuals claim. I have no reason to doubt you are being truthful and are a as you say a "resident i know my village and verify it." but you must know the world if full of people posting online things that are not true so Wikipedia requires reliable sources. It is not that your word is not trusted but even administrators or Wikimedia staff must provide sources. It is not personal - just the rules - for everyone. There are lots of 'notable' subjects in the world that do not have verifiable sources and so they cannot get a Wikipedia article, but that is unlikely for a village. Per WP:GEOLAND "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low", so as a start you need sources to show it exists and is populated (such as the Indian census data, government records). Also for a start many places have the same name so we need coordinates to show which subject we are talking about. I found the Rorian-Malaudh road but on google maps I could not see a place labelled Rorian? Regards KylieTastic (talk) 18:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism Fighter Star

	Vandalism Fighter Star
	You are an actual fighter of vandalism.Don't give up.It's ok if vandalism happens in your user page.You are an a real civilian. UniverseExplorer0 (talk) 10:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)