Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bounce Radio: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Redirect''' to [[Bell Media Radio]]. Strictly speaking, a networked brand identity doesn't have to clear [[WP:NCORP]] ''independently'' of whether its parent company clears NCORP, because it isn't a separate company in its own right — but it ''does'' need to pass [[WP:GNG]] on some evidence of coverage about the cultural and commercial ''impact'' of the brand, and just finding two same-day reprints of Bell's own self-published press release ''announcing'' the branding change isn't enough in and of itself. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if more independent analytical coverage can be found, but this isn't enough as of today. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 15:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Redirect''' to [[Bell Media Radio]]. Strictly speaking, a networked brand identity doesn't have to clear [[WP:NCORP]] ''independently'' of whether its parent company clears NCORP, because it isn't a separate company in its own right — but it ''does'' need to pass [[WP:GNG]] on some evidence of coverage about the cultural and commercial ''impact'' of the brand, and just finding two same-day reprints of Bell's own self-published press release ''announcing'' the branding change isn't enough in and of itself. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if more independent analytical coverage can be found, but this isn't enough as of today. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 15:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. I have recently found another source regarding this topic and added more information to the article with references to that sources to back up the info. Hence, there is just enough evidence to support this topic and the article should be notable enough to meet [[WP:NCORP]] and not be deleted or redirected. [[Special:Contributions/199.119.235.145|199.119.235.145]] ([[User talk:199.119.235.145|talk]]) 03:21, 26 June 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. I have recently found another source regarding this topic and added more information to the article with references to that sources to back up the info. Hence, there is just enough evidence to support this topic and the article should be notable enough to meet [[WP:NCORP]] and not be deleted or redirected. [[Special:Contributions/199.119.235.145|199.119.235.145]] ([[User talk:199.119.235.145|talk]]) 03:21, 26 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
::Notability is not a question of finding evidence that the topic ''exists'' — it's a question of finding evidence that the topic has been the ''subject of journalism'' in ''real media outlets'' that ''analyzes and contextualizes its significance''. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 14:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:37, 26 June 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bounce Radio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:NCORP- this internal grouping of brands is not independently notable of both the parent company Bell Media Radio and the individual stations. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:27, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Bell Media Radio. Strictly speaking, a networked brand identity doesn't have to clear WP:NCORP independently of whether its parent company clears NCORP, because it isn't a separate company in its own right — but it does need to pass WP:GNG on some evidence of coverage about the cultural and commercial impact of the brand, and just finding two same-day reprints of Bell's own self-published press release announcing the branding change isn't enough in and of itself. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if more independent analytical coverage can be found, but this isn't enough as of today. Bearcat (talk) 15:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. I have recently found another source regarding this topic and added more information to the article with references to that sources to back up the info. Hence, there is just enough evidence to support this topic and the article should be notable enough to meet WP:NCORP and not be deleted or redirected. 199.119.235.145 (talk) 03:21, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Notability is not a question of finding evidence that the topic exists — it's a question of finding evidence that the topic has been the subject of journalism in real media outlets that analyzes and contextualizes its significance. Bearcat (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC)