Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero waste agriculture: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 10:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Zero waste agriculture]]</noinclude></div> |
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 10:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Zero waste agriculture]]</noinclude></div> |
||
*'''Keep''' Intensive farming has a big problem with waste – I was reading about NI's "[https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jun/23/poo-overload-northern-ireland-could-be-forced-to-export-a-third-of-its-animal-waste poo overload]" just a few days ago. The page in question is about an obvious response – a more traditional style of agriculture in which by-products are recycled as manure and the like so that nothing is wasted. It's easy to find books such as ''Zero Waste – Management Practices for Environmental Sustainability'' and ''Sustainable Resource Recovery and Zero Waste Approaches'' which naturally include agriculture in their scope. Our policy [[WP:ATD]] therefore applies as it's our policy not to waste such promising material – see [[WP:PRESERVE]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 12:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:06, 29 June 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Zero waste agriculture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is an unreferenced WP:OR (tagged as such since 2007 when this was created). Worse, when I tried to rescue it by adding some citations I came to the conclusion the topic is not notable. (Note: don't confuse this with zero waste, which is). "Zero waste agriculture" is barely mentioned in GScholar/Books. GS has only a single English-language conference paper about this. GBooks open with a SPS "book" copying from Wikipedia, and then the term is used in passing in few other works. I am afraid there is nothing to rescue here, the term is ORish and any use of it outside Wikipedia seems to be the case of lowest denominator citogenesis. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - I find more Google Scholar mentions than the nom, including in the abstract of Overview of Pelletisation Technology and Pellet Characteristics from Maize Residues, which is published in the low-impact house journal of a bona fide industrial professional association. — Charles Stewart (talk) 03:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- Chalst, Well, I did say that the term is "barely mentioned". There are a few, but I am also concerned this may be the fact of low-quality scholarship taking the term invented on Wikipedia... Note that the work you cite doesn't explain the term, nor does it cite it. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:07, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Intensive farming has a big problem with waste – I was reading about NI's "poo overload" just a few days ago. The page in question is about an obvious response – a more traditional style of agriculture in which by-products are recycled as manure and the like so that nothing is wasted. It's easy to find books such as Zero Waste – Management Practices for Environmental Sustainability and Sustainable Resource Recovery and Zero Waste Approaches which naturally include agriculture in their scope. Our policy WP:ATD therefore applies as it's our policy not to waste such promising material – see WP:PRESERVE. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)