User talk:Puppies$Toasters999

June 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Toaster have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Toaster was changed by Puppies$Toasters999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952205 on 2021-06-30T00:24:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:24, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vibranium, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 00:43, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Toaster. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your picture that you claimed is a "more modern" toaster is anything but. The description clearly states that this toaster is older than the one we already show, and it certainly looks it. And please read WP:MINOR Meters (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Wilderness therapy, you may be blocked from editing. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:02, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Puppies$Toasters999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Star Wars: The Bad Batch did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Yeeno (talk) 🍁 03:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Bad batch edits

Please help me with... I wrote a lot on the bad batch article. You removed it because I did not cite a source. But I did not get any info from a source. I have just watched the show about 10 times. If you check all the info is correct. I understand I need a source though, should I just put myself as the source? I would love to get my writing back up, please tell me how Puppies$Toasters999 (talk) 04:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

No, you should not add yourself as a source. We only publish information from reliable sources, not someone who's watched a show a few times. If you can't find the information you wanted to publish in a good source, don't add it. Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 04:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

I understand what your saying. Your not sure if I am a reliable source. Understandable. Where do I go on Wikipedia to prove my credibility? Or alternatively should I add something like unverified facts at the end of my edits. Puppies$Toasters999 (talk) 05:48, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

I am sure: you're not. Wikipedia is not the place to publish your own research. You need to be able to cite actual reliable sources. Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 06:01, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

So what kinds of people do you trust. Because if I have to be a celebrity I think I could do it ( I might need a few months) but if your talking government official I don’t think I will ever get there. I assume you can use direct quotes because those are reliable. Can I quote myself? All of these rules are very confusing. To be honest I just want to help people get correct information. I mean I trust myself more than a website. I feel like I would know if I was lying but I might not know if a website was lying. You see what I mean. Thanks so much to responding to my endless questions. I know looking for errors on Wikipedia is not a job… but if it was I would give you my highest recommendation. Puppies$Toasters999 (talk) 06:19, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Your job as a Wikipedia editor is to summarize what reliable sources say about a topic. Adding your own personal interpretations is forbidden by policy. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:43, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

My response: I understand that I was recently blocked due to me quoting myself (is this correct?) I reached out to someone else to see if I could quote myself but they did not respond. So I went ahead and did it. So just to be clear… I can’t quote myself even when I am an expert in that topic.