Talk:2015 FA Cup final/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→GA Review: add |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
'''Overall''': |
'''Overall''': |
||
:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|???}} - a couple of minor prose issues. Fixed a couple of typoes I couldn't be arsed noting here (and were straightforward). Nice work. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 09:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC) |
:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|???}} - a couple of minor prose issues. Fixed a couple of typoes I couldn't be arsed noting here (and were straightforward). Nice work. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 09:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
::{{U|Casliber}} thanks very much, I think I've addressed your concerns, but do let me know if there's more I can do. Cheers. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] <small>([[User talk:The Rambling Man|Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!]])</small> 12:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:09, 14 July 2021
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi - I'll make copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning) and jot queries below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- They had previously won 11, a joint record with United, most recently last season's final against Hull City. - "last season's" makes it sound like 2020...however "previous" is repetitive....hmmm...how about "Of these, they had won 11, a joint record with United, most recently the previous season's final against Hull City." or somesuch.
- The game was watched by an average of 8 million viewers on BBC One and a peak of 8.8 million - reads oddly
- The Football Association charged him with misconduct. ....aaaand the punishment was....?
- Earwig's copyvio okay - false positive due to some quotes.
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: - a couple of minor prose issues. Fixed a couple of typoes I couldn't be arsed noting here (and were straightforward). Nice work. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Casliber thanks very much, I think I've addressed your concerns, but do let me know if there's more I can do. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 12:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)