Jump to content

Talk:Pegasus Project (investigation): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 213: Line 213:
[[:Project Pegasus (spyware)]] → {{no redirect|Project Pegasus (investigative journalism)}} – Current name is ambiguous with [[Pegasus (spyware)]] and implies that Project Pegasus is name of the malware that is the subject of the investigations.
[[:Project Pegasus (spyware)]] → {{no redirect|Project Pegasus (investigative journalism)}} – Current name is ambiguous with [[Pegasus (spyware)]] and implies that Project Pegasus is name of the malware that is the subject of the investigations.
<br>Proposed name disambiguates more clearly. [[User talk:Melmann|<strong><span style="font-family:Segoe UI Semilight ; background-color: #ffd166; padding: 1px;"><span style="color: #ef476f;">Mel</span><span style="color: #8c8757;">ma</span><span style="color: #118ab2;">nn</span></span></strong>]] 11:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
<br>Proposed name disambiguates more clearly. [[User talk:Melmann|<strong><span style="font-family:Segoe UI Semilight ; background-color: #ffd166; padding: 1px;"><span style="color: #ef476f;">Mel</span><span style="color: #8c8757;">ma</span><span style="color: #118ab2;">nn</span></span></strong>]] 11:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

: I chose (spyware) because that was the keyword used in the disambiguation page, and also at the ITN nomination. Without too much thinking, this is how people naturally disambiguate. I think (investigative journalism) is too broad and overly verbose. Can we think of something shorter and more specific? [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 12:37, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:37, 21 July 2021


List of targets

Hi there, I integrated half of the target from this Guardian review into the article. Can someone push further to expand that list ? Yug (talk) 13:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the "list" should be classified into countries. Technically, they were not targeted by Pegasus, but by their own governments that had licensed the Pegasus spyware. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kautilya3: I plan to make it a table "soon", when it reach some correct size (current x 1.5). Yug (talk) 15:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tables can never be a substitute for prose text. They can be used in addition. But in the days to come, we are going to get a lot more detail about why the individuals were targeted and what the fallout has been. None of that will fit into a table. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Table with : Country, Name, Profession, Comment will do. Yug (talk) 07:29, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move to The Pegasus Project

The name of the investigation is "The Pegasus Project", so the article should be moved to that title. --93.44.108.28 (talk) 14:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It should be Pegasus Project, because we omit the definite article as per WP:DEFINITE. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pegasus Project already exists. Maybe Pegasus Project (journalism) or Pegasus Project (surveillance). I think the former is better (journalism). Yug (talk) 15:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, let us stick to the current title then. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I support Pegasus Project (journalism). --93.44.108.28 (talk) 15:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article expansion : coordination

Ok, we spent the past 36h creating a core, this article now has relevant sections which can be easy to expand using emerging news coverage. All areas need to be improve, as usual. Yet the following are more significant that others :

  • Analysis and reactions : There is still too few content on the analysis, what is the analysis, impact and what experts and journalist says over this surveillance tool and abuse.
  • List of targets : the list can still be expanded. Names will emerge in coming days, context can be added to each case. It's easy to contribute to, and by expanding it we will see emerge meaningful patterns.
  • Clients countries : there are about 10 governments, mainly illiberal democracies, which are confirmed as clients and using Pegasus for repressive use. Can we have a short contextualization for each, sourced from the press ? If this is done per country, then it could go in the current "Targets" section, which will have to be renamed.

Help welcome. Yug (talk) 18:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Portals to monitor

Please contribute by following one portal related to Project Pegasus and integrating key statements to Wikipedia.

The 17 newsrooms involved generally have dedicated portals page to display all stories related to this leak and investigation. It could be unteresting to list them below, to monitor them, and to add content to the article accordingly. Yug (talk) 18:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC) List of portals :[reply]

Newsroom Country Pegasus portals Project Pegasus Comments Wikipedian
The Guardian UK https://theguardian.com/news/series/pegasus-project Yes Emphasis on European, Indian fallout. Yug
Le Monde France https://lemonde.fr/projet-pegasus/ Yes Emphasis on France and African fallout. Yug
Radio France France https://radiofrance.fr/recherche?q=pegasus Yes Emphasis on France and Francophonie. Radio/TV only.
Die Zeit Germany https://zeit.de/schwerpunkte/pegasus-project Yes
Süddeutsche Zeitung Germany Yes
WDR Germany Yes
NDR Germany Yes
The Washington Post USA Yes
Frontline[1] USA Yes
Haaretz Israel https://haaretz.com/misc/tags/TAG-NSO-1.10010576 Yes
Aristegui Noticias Mexico Yes
Proceso Mexico Yes
Knack Belgium Yes
Le Soir Belgium https://plus.lesoir.be/339077/sections/le-projet-pegasus Yes
The Wire India https://thewire.in/tag/pegasus-project Yes Emphasis on Indian fallout
Daraj[2] Syria Yes
Direkt36.hu [hu],[3] Hungary https://www.direkt36.hu/en/category/megfigyelesek/ Yes Coverage in English
OCCRP Yes
Forbidden Stories France https://forbiddenstories.org/case/the-pegasus-project/ Yes Recipient then provider of the leaked 50,000 phones numbers.
Amnesty International UK https://amnesty.org/en/search/?q=pegasus&sort=date Yes Provided forensic know-how related to Pegasus.
France 24 France https://france24.com/en/tag/pegasus-affair/
https://france24.com/fr/tag/pegasus/
No
Al Jazeera English Qatar https://aljazeera.com/search/pegasus No Emphasis on arabic world.

https://daraj.com/en/tag/pegasus-en/ Yug (talk) 05:40, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "About The Pegasus Project". Forbidden Stories. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  2. ^ "Israel Helped Over Ten Countries Tap Over 50,000 Phones". Daraj. 18 July 2021. Retrieved 20 July 2021.
  3. ^ Panyi, Szabolcs; Pethő, András (2021-07-19). "Hungarian journalists and critics of Orbán were targeted with Pegasus, a powerful Israeli cyberweapon". Direkt36. Retrieved 2021-07-19.

Regarding response of govt of India

The article states that GoI has denied usage of pegasus, however I was not able to find any sources that a representative of the GoI making such claims. The citation added supported no such claim and I have removed it. I have added a citation needed reference, but I would like to remove the statement all together. May I go ahead with this change? Does anyone have any other sources to corroborate the statement or anything else to say in this matter? --ShellPandey (talk) 10:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found this that highlight the same issue that the GoI has not issued any response saying that India has not used pegasus. --ShellPandey (talk) 10:12, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 July 2021

Project Pegasus (spyware)Project Pegasus (investigative journalism) – Current name is ambiguous with Pegasus (spyware) and implies that Project Pegasus is name of the malware that is the subject of the investigations.
Proposed name disambiguates more clearly. Melmann 11:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I chose (spyware) because that was the keyword used in the disambiguation page, and also at the ITN nomination. Without too much thinking, this is how people naturally disambiguate. I think (investigative journalism) is too broad and overly verbose. Can we think of something shorter and more specific? Jehochman Talk 12:37, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]