User:Minihaa/Incorporation of doctoral theses: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* https://ora.ox.ac.uk/ |
* https://ora.ox.ac.uk/ |
||
* https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Farchiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de%2Fvolltextserver+creative+commons |
* https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Farchiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de%2Fvolltextserver+creative+commons+thesis |
||
== Disadvantages == |
== Disadvantages == |
Revision as of 19:04, 21 July 2021
Why do the heavy lifting yourself? Simply incorporate material that is readily available into Wikipedia. The literature overview section of PhD theses are in some cases very usable and typically well referenced (even though some drawbacks exist). Only the literature overview of a PhD thesis is suited as it is backed up by peer-reviewed literature.
Where to find
Numerous depositories exist with PhD theses under a free licence, for example:
- https://ora.ox.ac.uk/
- https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Farchiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de%2Fvolltextserver+creative+commons+thesis
Disadvantages
Using text from PhD theses may have potential drawbacks:
- The text might be very technical, a introduction might have to be written or the text might not be suited at all.