User talk:Xi Xing Ping: Difference between revisions
Decline unblock |
Xi Xing Ping (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[HighInBC]] what reason you are point out now???identical to helis007??? Any other reasons plz https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1036405292 . |
[[HighInBC]] what reason you are point out now???identical to helis007??? Any other reasons plz https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1036405292 . |
||
The edit contains the required citations right?? Even Wikipedia rules out u can avoid all the rules at particular instance. [[User:Xi Xing Ping|Xi Xing Ping]] ([[User talk:Xi Xing Ping#top|talk]]) 10:27, 31 July 2021 (UTC) |
The edit contains the required citations right?? Even Wikipedia rules out u can avoid all the rules at particular instance. [[User:Xi Xing Ping|Xi Xing Ping]] ([[User talk:Xi Xing Ping#top|talk]]) 10:27, 31 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
[[Echo1Charlie]] and [[HighInBC]] why can't u guys talk about this one?? |
|||
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1036374053 |
|||
Why can't [[Echo1Charlie]] can't answer that ?? Instead of filing an complaint??? I already informed him that I am gonna to edit that page. Why did he respond to that? Isn't this kind of trick? To prevent other editors to edit the page?? [[User:Xi Xing Ping|Xi Xing Ping]] ([[User talk:Xi Xing Ping#top|talk]]) 10:45, 31 July 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:45, 31 July 2021
July 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Arjun (tank), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 09:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. - TheresNoTime 😺 09:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Xi Xing Ping (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
there's no strong evidence to suggest the claim made by formaldude and Echo1Charlie,I have just copied the claims made by Helios007 if u have any strong evidence to suggest me then u may go ahead, there's been no rule to my knowledge that prevents the users from editing the right one which is based on other editiors. If u find any spamming or any vandilism then I would accept the block, so the block is unnecessary.
Decline reason:
You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. This is based on behavioral and technical evidence. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 10:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Xi Xing Ping (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
MY EDITS ARE ALL BASED ON HELIOS007 not the same! , I have copied the same thing apart from that if u found anything strong then provide that, all those proofs provided by [Echo1Charlie]] and formal dude are based on assumption ONLY. As I told before all my edits are cut copy paste from the past. So,the block is unnecessary ]
Decline reason:
Sockpuppetry admitted below, "Indiana_James_007 is one of my account". Even without the technical evidence, this block is clearly appropriate. Yamla (talk) 10:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What about User:Indiana James 007? Same edit as Helios, same 007, same edit as you. Also a checkuser confirmed this. Also you all speak english the same way. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 10:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
HighInBC could u answer my question??? Indiana_James_007 is one of my account, but the reasons are not strong enough, to link this with Helios 007. Xi Xing Ping (talk) 10:21, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
HighInBC just got tired of Wikipedia, anyone could block anyone by pointing out stupid reasons Echo1Charlie. Xi Xing Ping (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
HighInBC what reason you are point out now???identical to helis007??? Any other reasons plz https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1036405292 . The edit contains the required citations right?? Even Wikipedia rules out u can avoid all the rules at particular instance. Xi Xing Ping (talk) 10:27, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Echo1Charlie and HighInBC why can't u guys talk about this one?? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1036374053 Why can't Echo1Charlie can't answer that ?? Instead of filing an complaint??? I already informed him that I am gonna to edit that page. Why did he respond to that? Isn't this kind of trick? To prevent other editors to edit the page?? Xi Xing Ping (talk) 10:45, 31 July 2021 (UTC)