User talk:PackMecEng: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Warning: Disrupting ANI with personal attacks Tag: Reverted |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:{{u|SPECIFICO}}, I started a discussion on the talk page. It was not a BRD vio by Spy-cicle that I can see. If anything you violated it when you reinstated without discussion after you were reverted. Also out of the five people involved no one started a dang discussion! So it is now at status quo and a discussion is happening on the talk page. [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng#top|talk]]) 11:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC) |
:{{u|SPECIFICO}}, I started a discussion on the talk page. It was not a BRD vio by Spy-cicle that I can see. If anything you violated it when you reinstated without discussion after you were reverted. Also out of the five people involved no one started a dang discussion! So it is now at status quo and a discussion is happening on the talk page. [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng#top|talk]]) 11:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
::Yes it was, which was why I fixed it. Yes, you might call my fix a violation, but IMO it's a better move than reporting a newbie for an easily fixed violation. The larger problem with that editor is his insistence on "negotiations" relating to North Korea when as several have pointed out on talk, the term negotiations is not in the article text on the subject and is quite dubious if one examines recent RS accounts of the events.[[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 15:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC) |
::Yes it was, which was why I fixed it. Yes, you might call my fix a violation, but IMO it's a better move than reporting a newbie for an easily fixed violation. The larger problem with that editor is his insistence on "negotiations" relating to North Korea when as several have pointed out on talk, the term negotiations is not in the article text on the subject and is quite dubious if one examines recent RS accounts of the events.[[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 15:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
==Disrupting ANI with personal attacks== |
|||
Especially considering that you were page blocked from AN for a week in May, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PackMecEng/Archive_5#May_2021], you need to be more careful about stirring the pot on ANI also, and not add nasty personal attacks such as "MPants has always had kind of a whiney and shit attitude".[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=1036827879] [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 09:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC). |
|||
Revision as of 09:15, 3 August 2021
Trump
it was a 24-BRD violation by Spy-cicle. SPECIFICO talk 02:47, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- SPECIFICO, I started a discussion on the talk page. It was not a BRD vio by Spy-cicle that I can see. If anything you violated it when you reinstated without discussion after you were reverted. Also out of the five people involved no one started a dang discussion! So it is now at status quo and a discussion is happening on the talk page. PackMecEng (talk) 11:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yes it was, which was why I fixed it. Yes, you might call my fix a violation, but IMO it's a better move than reporting a newbie for an easily fixed violation. The larger problem with that editor is his insistence on "negotiations" relating to North Korea when as several have pointed out on talk, the term negotiations is not in the article text on the subject and is quite dubious if one examines recent RS accounts of the events. SPECIFICO talk 15:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Disrupting ANI with personal attacks
Especially considering that you were page blocked from AN for a week in May, [1], you need to be more careful about stirring the pot on ANI also, and not add nasty personal attacks such as "MPants has always had kind of a whiney and shit attitude".[2] Bishonen | tålk 09:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC).