Talk:Battle of Babylon Hill: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:50, 12 August 2021

Battle of Babylon Hill is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 7, 2021.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 8, 2019	Good article nominee	Listed
October 30, 2019	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
January 30, 2020	Featured article candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 6, 2019. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that according to one historian, the Battle of Babylon Hill* was "more muddle than battle"?*
Current status: Featured article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: British / European / Early Modern / Wars of the Three Kingdoms FA‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

FA

This article has been rated as FA-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United Kingdom FA‑class Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Dorset FA‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Somerset FA‑class Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

B class review comment

I have two comments. Djmaschek (talk) 01:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When you write a battle article, please edit the associated campaignbox template and add the battle name (in this case: Template:Campaignbox First English Civil War). This time I did it for you.
In the introduction, it says Hopton was almost captured, but I don't see this in the narrative. This information and citation should probably be in the narrative. I'm not sure in what part of the skirmish this happened. Once it's in the narrative, it does not need a citation in the introduction.

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 |currentstatus = FA
+|maindate=September 7, 2021
 |topic = War
 |dykdate=6 October 2019