Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jews in Tunisia: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 16:53, 18 August 2021

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 04:00, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

Jews in Tunisia

At first glance it looks like a disambig page. But all it has is a link to Islam and Judaism and two links to articles of groups of Jewish people. Neither of those articles mention Tunisia. This article doesn't make a lot of sense as it's currently written. Keep as currently rewritten. DaveTheRed 08:07, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Delete, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 11:07, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete - I can only barely imagine an encyclopaedic article of this title, and can't see how to get there from here - David Gerard 13:22, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep and expand — It appears to be part of a series of articles linked from Jews by country, many of which are substantial pages. So to me it just looks like a stub at the moment. — RJH 17:36, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete. It makes no sense to create articles about Jews in different countries and then redirect users to Judaism and Islam as if Islam is synonymous with Arab countries. --Prisk 22:14, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Strong keep. Valid and important historical article subject. --Gene_poole 01:02, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep - compare Jews in Algeria. Was well short of the stub bar, admittedly, but I've expanded it to a stub. - Mustafaa 08:04, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Concur with David, delete. Radiant! 09:02, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, nn jewcruft. ComCat 09:11, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Neutrality^talk 03:33, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Stubby, but has perfectly good article potential. I can't imagine why anyone would doubt the potential to write an article on almost any ethnic group with a significant history in a given country. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:50, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. --Eliezer 06:18, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep --Mrfixter 12:16, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Has potential for expansion. --Decius 09:21, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep. What Jmabel said. Jayjg ^(talk) 14:58, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I've expanded it a little, and given a number of links which indicate significantly greater expansion is possible and worthwhile. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:26, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Keep. Also agree with Jmabel. SlimVirgin 22:45, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. It's coming out good SF2K1 23:31, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 *'''Keep''' --[[User:Mrfixter|Mrfixter]] 12:16, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Keep'''. Has potential for expansion. --[[User:Decius|Decius]] 09:21, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
-*'''Keep'''. What Jmabel said. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></sup> 14:58, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''. What Jmabel said. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]][[User_talk:Jayjg|<sup style="color:darkgreen;">(talk)</sup>]] 14:58, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
-:* I've expanded it a little, and given a number of links which indicate significantly greater expansion is possible and worthwhile. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></sup> 23:26, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
+:* I've expanded it a little, and given a number of links which indicate significantly greater expansion is possible and worthwhile. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]][[User_talk:Jayjg|<sup style="color:darkgreen;">(talk)</sup>]] 23:26, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Keep'''. Also agree with Jmabel. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] 22:45, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Keep'''. It's coming out good [[User:SpaceFalcon2001|SF2K1]] 23:31, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)