Comparison of anti-plagiarism software: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit |
Added Quetext to the list. Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
| Latin, Cyrillic |
| Latin, Cyrillic |
||
| Rated as ''"Useless for academic purposes"'' by Plagiats Portal<ref>[http://plagiat.htw-berlin.de/software-en/test2013/ Results of the Plagiarism Detection System Test 2013]; Plagiats Portal. See also [http://plagiat.htw-berlin.de/software-en/test2013/s13-12-plagtracker/ detailed critique of PlagTracker] on Plagiats Portal. Analyses by Debora Weber-Wulff (HTW Berlin). Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref> |
| Rated as ''"Useless for academic purposes"'' by Plagiats Portal<ref>[http://plagiat.htw-berlin.de/software-en/test2013/ Results of the Plagiarism Detection System Test 2013]; Plagiats Portal. See also [http://plagiat.htw-berlin.de/software-en/test2013/s13-12-plagtracker/ detailed critique of PlagTracker] on Plagiats Portal. Analyses by Debora Weber-Wulff (HTW Berlin). Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref> |
||
|- |
|||
!Quetext |
|||
|Quetext |
|||
|2015 |
|||
|2021 |
|||
|[[freemium]] |
|||
|[[Software as a service|SaaS]] |
|||
|Latin, Cyrillic |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! [[Turnitin]] |
! [[Turnitin]] |
||
Revision as of 14:27, 19 August 2021
The following tables compare software used for plagiarism detection.
General
| Software | Developer | First public release | Latest stable version | License | Deployment options | Scripts supported | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copyscape | Indigo Stream Technologies, Ltd. | 2004 | freemium[1] | SaaS | Latin | Targeted at website managers.[2] | |
| Grammarly | Grammarly, Inc. | 2016 | freemium | SaaS | Latin | Checks against ProQuest databases and (public) web pages.[3] | |
| HelioBLAST | Virginia Bioinformatics Institute | ? | (free of charge web service) | Latin | Submissions are limited to 1,000 words. Checking against abstract and titles in Medline/PubMed.[4] | ||
| iThenticate | iParadigms | 2004 | 2017 | proprietary | SaaS | Latin | |
| PlagScan | PlagScan GmbH | 2008 | limited | SaaS, On-Premises[5] | Latin, Cyrillic & Arabic[6][7] | Submissions are checked against (public) online documents, a (private) shared repository, and the user's own (private) repository.[8] | |
| PlagTracker | Devellar | 2011 | freemium | SaaS | Latin, Cyrillic | Rated as "Useless for academic purposes" by Plagiats Portal[9] | |
| Quetext | Quetext | 2015 | 2021 | freemium | SaaS | Latin, Cyrillic | |
| Turnitin | iParadigms | 1997 | proprietary | SaaS | Latin & multiple scripts through translation [10] | Automatically stores uploaded texts (submitted for checking) in its own database.[11] | |
| Unicheck | Unicheck | 2014 | SaaS | proprietary | SaaS | Latin, Cyrillic | Pricing "per page" based on 137.5 words per nominal page.[12] |
References
- ^ Copyscape FAQ: "What is the difference between Copyscape Premium and the free Copyscape service?". Accessed 2019-02-06.
- ^ Copyscape FAQ: "What is Copyscape used for?". Accessed 2019-02-06.
- ^ Grammarly: Plagiarism Checker. Accessed 2019-02-08.
- ^ HelioBlast website, Accessed 2019-02-02.
- ^ Plagiarism Detection Within your own Data Processing Center
- ^ PlagScan FAQ: "Is it possible to check text in any language?" Accessed 2019-02-06.
- ^ PlagScan : Kommentar zum Software-Test der HTW 2013 (in German). Accessed 2019-02-06.
- ^ Plagiarism Prevention Pool (PPP) | PlagScan. Accessed 2019-02-05.
- ^ Results of the Plagiarism Detection System Test 2013; Plagiats Portal. See also detailed critique of PlagTracker on Plagiats Portal. Analyses by Debora Weber-Wulff (HTW Berlin). Accessed 2019-02-06.
- ^ - Enable Translated Matching
- ^ Plagiarism Detection Systems Not Tested in 2013, Plagiats Portal. Analyses by Debora Weber-Wulff (HTW Berlin). Accessed 2019-02-06.
- ^ Strong plagiarism finder - Unicheck. Prices Accessed 2019-02-06.
 | This software article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |