Talk:Mumbai FC: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:21, 24 August 2021

Football C‑class Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Maharashtra / Mumbai C‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as Low-importance).

On 17 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Mumbai F.C. to Mumbai FC. The result of the discussion was moved.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mumbai F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 August 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 21:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mumbai F.C. → Mumbai FC – Consistency with current naming conventions in Category:Football clubs in India , Category:Indian Super League teams and so on. 14:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)~~

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 11:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - one of a mass number of nominations by this editor (at least 16 by my count?!) with no sources presented and no clear category convention to match. Giant Snowman 11:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many Indian Football Club article titles have FC or SC or AC, But Some Indian Football Club article titles have F.C. or S.C. or A.C. So In order to unify disordered article titles, I requested many title moves. What's wrong with that?

Support for consistency. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 20:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support for consistency. I was the one who actually moved a lot of these articles since Indian clubs en masse do not use the "." in FC, SC, AC etc. Most likely, the articles were titled like that due to original editors copying what is done with the Premier League. The Indian Super League itself doesn't add dots, and neither does the I-League. All other clubs have social media and some news coverage which never uses the dots. The Times of India doesn't use it, outlook india doesn't and even The Hindu does not include them. It's literally something that just does not exist in India or used besides on some wikipedia articles. Makes no sense to include. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 21:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WikiProject Football|class=C|importance=Low}}
 {{WikiProject India|class=C|importance=Low|maharashtra=yes|maharashtra-importance=low|mumbai=yes|mumbai-importance=low}}
+{{old move|date=17 August 2021|from=Mumbai F.C.|destination=Mumbai FC|result=moved|link=Special:Permalink/1040018990#Requested move 17 August 2021}}
 == External links modified (February 2018) ==
@@ Line 19: / Line 21: @@
 == Requested move 17 August 2021 ==
+<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
-{{requested move/dated|Mumbai FC}}
+:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. ''
+The result of the move request was: '''moved.''' <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Closure by a page mover|closed by non-admin page mover]])</small> [[User:Lennart97|Lennart97]] ([[User talk:Lennart97|talk]]) 21:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
+----
 [[:Mumbai F.C.]] → {{no redirect|Mumbai FC}} – Consistency with current naming conventions in [[:Category:Football clubs in India ]], [[:Category:Indian Super League teams]] and so on. 14:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)~~
@@ Line 28: / Line 34: @@
 *'''Support''' for consistency. I was the one who actually moved a lot of these articles since Indian clubs en masse do not use the "." in FC, SC, AC etc. Most likely, the articles were titled like that due to original editors copying what is done with the [[Premier League]]. The [https://www.indiansuperleague.com/standings Indian Super League] itself doesn't add dots, and neither does the [https://i-league.org/ I-League]. All other clubs have social media and some news coverage which never uses the dots. The [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/football/indian-super-league Times of India] doesn't use it, [https://www.outlookindia.com/website/section/sports/22/ outlook india] doesn't and even [https://sportstar.thehindu.com/football/isl/ The Hindu] does not include them. It's literally something that just does not exist in India or used besides on some wikipedia articles. Makes no sense to include. --[[User:ArsenalFan700|ArsenalFan700]] ([[User talk:ArsenalFan700|talk]]) 21:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 *'''Support''' per nom.--[[User:Ortizesp|Ortizesp]] ([[User talk:Ortizesp|talk]]) 05:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
+<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] -->
+</div><div style="clear:both;"></div>