Jump to content

Talk:You're Wrong About: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
re
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
:I agree. It's a little hard to navigate in its current form, so I think it would be a good idea.[[User:SirLou|SirLou]] ([[User talk:SirLou|talk]]) 00:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
:I agree. It's a little hard to navigate in its current form, so I think it would be a good idea.[[User:SirLou|SirLou]] ([[User talk:SirLou|talk]]) 00:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
::{{re|SirLou}} after some discussion at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Podcasting#Lists_of_Episodes]] and some other podcast articles that I opened split discussions for a few other editors and myself have come to the consensus that collapsible tables are preferred alternatives to splitting tables into separate articles, but that pre-collapsing tables is deprecated and should be avoided. Would you be opposed to closing this discussion as '''Not Split''' and simply make the tables collapsible? [[User:TipsyElephant|TipsyElephant]] ([[User talk:TipsyElephant|talk]]) 14:35, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
::{{re|SirLou}} after some discussion at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Podcasting#Lists_of_Episodes]] and some other podcast articles that I opened split discussions for a few other editors and myself have come to the consensus that collapsible tables are preferred alternatives to splitting tables into separate articles, but that pre-collapsing tables is deprecated and should be avoided. Would you be opposed to closing this discussion as '''Not Split''' and simply make the tables collapsible? [[User:TipsyElephant|TipsyElephant]] ([[User talk:TipsyElephant|talk]]) 14:35, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
:::That would probably be better. [[User:SirLou|SirLou]] ([[User talk:SirLou|talk]]) 15:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:52, 3 September 2021

WikiProject iconPodcasting C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Split proposed

I'm proposing that the episodes be split into a separate article the same way that The Last Podcast on the Left has a separate article called List of The Last Podcast on the Left episodes. Right now the episode list takes up the majority of the page and although the word count might not be extremely large I think it's still too long (WP:SIZESPLIT) or if that's not a valid reason I'd say that the episodes constitute a different article because they are a slightly different subject (WP:CONTENTSPLIT). Either way it appears to be common practice to split episode lists into their own article once they've become lengthy (Lists of episodes). TipsyElephant (talk) 02:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It's a little hard to navigate in its current form, so I think it would be a good idea.SirLou (talk) 00:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SirLou: after some discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Podcasting#Lists_of_Episodes and some other podcast articles that I opened split discussions for a few other editors and myself have come to the consensus that collapsible tables are preferred alternatives to splitting tables into separate articles, but that pre-collapsing tables is deprecated and should be avoided. Would you be opposed to closing this discussion as Not Split and simply make the tables collapsible? TipsyElephant (talk) 14:35, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That would probably be better. SirLou (talk) 15:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]