Jump to content

Talk:Shaurya Doval: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Assessment (Low): Articles for creation (C), Biography (Stub), India (Stub), Politics (Stub), +banner shell (Rater)
Ht24 (talk | contribs)
m Ht24 moved page Talk:Shaurya Doval to Draft talk:Shaurya Doval over redirect: needs improvement
(No difference)

Revision as of 04:39, 5 September 2021

Draft created after deletion review

@K.e.coffman and S Marshall: given this deletion review I'd appreciate extra eyes on the draft. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi, thanks for the invitation. I'm not sure that it's right to say Shaurya Doval is a politician? -- I think he's a businessman primarily, who's making early steps to break into politics. Let's say, charitably, that the sources seem to be about his political ambitions rather than his political achievements.—S Marshall T/C 16:11, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability assessment

Reliable sources based on this assessment where possible

Source assessment table: prepared by User:Curb Safe Charmer
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Center for American Progress No Text probably provided by Doval Yes No One paragraph profile No
The Wire Yes Yes Yes Yes
Torch Investment No His own company's website No No Very brief profile No
Indian Express Yes Yes WP:INDIANEXP Yes Yes
Dainik Jagran Yes No Per assessment at User:Winged Blades of Godric/Indian Media#Dainik Jagran No Just a mention No
Jansatta Yes Yes Yes Yes
Indian Express Yes Yes WP:INDIANEXP Yes Yes
Jansatta Yes Yes No Just a mention No
The Hindu Yes Yes Yes Yes
The Quint Yes Yes Yes Yes
The Caravan Yes Yes Yes Yes
The Hindu Yes Yes WP:THEHINDU Yes Yes
Indian Express Yes Yes WP:INDIANEXP Yes Yes
Indian Express Yes Yes WP:INDIANEXP Yes Yes
Dilsedeshi No No Yes No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

I have assessed that the subject passes WP:GNG due to significant and sustained coverage (2017-2020) in multiple reliable, independent publications. The draft was rewritten from the previous ones that were deleted and I don't think any content in this version is promotional. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:29, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove speedy

I removed the speedy, given that the article has come through the draft process and the other comments and reviews on the talk page. This subject does not qualify for WP:G4. Jeepday (talk) 11:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It has also been at AFD at least two times. Including just last month and been deleted each time. THis article should be deleted and SALTED....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:05, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear William Yes, it was deleted previously. But then, after discussions with other Wikipedians, I was asked to write a draft which would be closely assessed. If you could read the talk page and the 2nd Deletion Nomination, you can find out the details. Ht24 (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

Please share the reason for putting a speedy deletion tag on this article. I tried to write this as per the instructions from various Wikipedia editors and was approved by Curb Safe Charmer. He helped me understand Wikipedia policies and the art of rules to follow for drafting a new article.

Please read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Shaurya_Doval. Thanks! Ht24 (talk) 12:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]