Talk:War profiteering: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:War profiteering/Archive 1) (bot |
PearBOT II (talk | contribs) m Merge Talk header and Auto archiving notice per TfD |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} |
{{Talkheader|archive_age=1|archive_units=year}} |
||
{{WPMILHIST|class=Start |
{{WPMILHIST|class=Start |
||
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all |
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| minthreadsleft = 2 |
| minthreadsleft = 2 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Auto archiving notice|=Lowercase sigmabot III|age= |units= 1 year}} |
|||
== Major changes, tightened scope of accusation == |
== Major changes, tightened scope of accusation == |
Revision as of 02:02, 9 September 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the War profiteering article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
Military history: Technology / World War I / World War II Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Npsanchez, Shainamarco, Anapandrade, Fparra247, Hannaheaton (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Agarcia101, Kmbatt, NPSHamilton, Partguypartshark, Colleen1596, Tysauer, Sarias19.
Major changes, tightened scope of accusation
What I found on this page seemed to take the ultra-literal tack that anyone who profits from a war is a war profiteer. I highly doubt that this is the common usage. It's so broad as to lose its meaning. Many people unknowingly own a piece of an arms company through mutual funds, etc., and soldiers buy sunglasses, flashlights, clothes, etc. from companies that have no idea what's happening. Even Silly String has a military use.
Reversion
I reverted the recent anon changes since they were very POV, and read in essay style. —Morven 06:04, Sep 14, 2004 (UTC)