Jump to content

Mathematically Correct: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m clean up
Clearer as inline lists rather than sections. Removing link to a deleted article.
Line 10: Line 10:
Mathematically Correct's main point of contention was that, in reform textbooks, traditional methods and concepts have been omitted or replaced by new terminology and procedures. As a result, in the case of the high-school program [[Core-Plus Mathematics Project]], for example, [http://www.maa.org/pubs/monthly_dec06_toc.html some reports suggest] that students may be unprepared for college level courses upon completion of the program. Other programs given poor ratings include programs aimed at elementary school students, such as Dale Seymour Publications (TERC) [[Investigations in Numbers, Data, and Space]] and Everyday Learning [[Everyday Mathematics]].
Mathematically Correct's main point of contention was that, in reform textbooks, traditional methods and concepts have been omitted or replaced by new terminology and procedures. As a result, in the case of the high-school program [[Core-Plus Mathematics Project]], for example, [http://www.maa.org/pubs/monthly_dec06_toc.html some reports suggest] that students may be unprepared for college level courses upon completion of the program. Other programs given poor ratings include programs aimed at elementary school students, such as Dale Seymour Publications (TERC) [[Investigations in Numbers, Data, and Space]] and Everyday Learning [[Everyday Mathematics]].


Since Mathematically Correct had reviewed the programs, many have undergone revisions and are now with different publishers. Other programs, such as [[Mathland]] have been terminated.
After Mathematically Correct's review of the programs, many have undergone revisions and are now with different publishers. Other programs, such as [[Mathland]] have been terminated.

== Publications with poor reviews from Mathematically Correct ==


== Reviews by the site ==
Publications with poor reviews from Mathematically Correct include:
* [[Addison-Wesley Secondary Math: An Integrated Approach: Focus on Algebra]]
* [[Addison-Wesley Secondary Math: An Integrated Approach: Focus on Algebra]]
* [[Core-Plus Mathematics Project]]
* [[Core-Plus Mathematics Project]]
Line 19: Line 19:
* [[Mathland]]
* [[Mathland]]
* [[National Council of Teachers of Mathematics#1989 Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics|NCTM's 1989 Standards]] produced by the professional association for teachers of mathematics. The Standards encouraged increased emphasis on problem solving and decreased attention to algorithms learned by rote. It was perceived by some critics to recommend elimination of standard algorithms.
* [[National Council of Teachers of Mathematics#1989 Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics|NCTM's 1989 Standards]] produced by the professional association for teachers of mathematics. The Standards encouraged increased emphasis on problem solving and decreased attention to algorithms learned by rote. It was perceived by some critics to recommend elimination of standard algorithms.
Curricula not judged deficient by Mathematically Correct include:

* [[Singapore math]] – Math textbooks used in Singapore
== Curricula not judged deficient by Mathematically Correct ==
* [[Saxon math]] A program created by a retired Air Force officer who had been highly critical of mathematics teaching reforms from the late 1960s to 1990s.

* [[Singapore math]] Textbooks used in Singapore
* [[Saxon math]] A program created by a retired Air Force officer who had been highly critical of mathematics teaching reforms from the late 1960s to 1990s.
* [[Modern Curriculum Press]]
* [[Modern Curriculum Press]]
State tests that were judged deficient by Mathematically Correct are:

* [[CLAS (education)|CLAS]] – A defunct California test, based on [[NCTM standards]] and California mathematics standards replaces in 2002
== State assessments judged deficient by Mathematically Correct ==
* [[Washington Assessment of Student Learning|WASL]] Washington State standards
* [[CLAS (education)|CLAS]] defunct California test, based on [[NCTM standards]] and California mathematics standards replaces in 2002
* [[Washington Assessment of Student Learning|WASL]] Washington State standards

== See also==
* [[NYC HOLD]] active NY city group on mathematics reform


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 20:57, 11 September 2021

Mathematically Correct was a U.S.-based website created by educators, parents, mathematicians, and scientists who were concerned about the direction of reform mathematics curricula based on NCTM standards.[1][2] Created in 1997, it was a frequently cited website in the so-called Math wars, and was actively updated until 2003. The website went offline sometime in late 2012 or early 2013 but has been preserved on the Internet Archive.

History

Although Mathematically Correct had a national scope, much of its focus was on advocating against mathematics curricula prevalent in California in the mid-1990s. When California reversed course and adopted more traditional mathematics texts (2001 - 2002), Mathematically Correct changed its focus to reviewing the new text books. Convinced that the choices were adequate, the website went largely dormant.

Mathematically Correct maintained a large section of critical articles and reviews for a number of math programs. Most of the program opposed by Mathematically Correct had been developed from research projects funded by the National Science Foundation. Most of these programs also claimed to have been based on the 1989 Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics published by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Mathematically Correct's main point of contention was that, in reform textbooks, traditional methods and concepts have been omitted or replaced by new terminology and procedures. As a result, in the case of the high-school program Core-Plus Mathematics Project, for example, some reports suggest that students may be unprepared for college level courses upon completion of the program. Other programs given poor ratings include programs aimed at elementary school students, such as Dale Seymour Publications (TERC) Investigations in Numbers, Data, and Space and Everyday Learning Everyday Mathematics.

After Mathematically Correct's review of the programs, many have undergone revisions and are now with different publishers. Other programs, such as Mathland have been terminated.

Reviews by the site

Publications with poor reviews from Mathematically Correct include:

Curricula not judged deficient by Mathematically Correct include:

State tests that were judged deficient by Mathematically Correct are:

  • CLAS – A defunct California test, based on NCTM standards and California mathematics standards replaces in 2002
  • WASL – Washington State standards

References

  1. ^ "MathematicallyCorrect.com - US-Based organization that stresses need for Mathematics fundamentals". TeachMeWell. 2008. Retrieved 2018-01-18.
  2. ^ Klein, David (2000-04-01). "MATH PROBLEMS". NYC Hold. American School Board Journal. Retrieved 2018-01-18.