Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Washington University/Behavioral Ecology (Fall): Difference between revisions

Why take this course? This course is about understanding why organisms evolve to act the way they do. We focus on social behaviors and particularly on understanding conflict and cooperation. How do genetically distinct individuals cooperate while still favoring their own interests? We study things like the evolution of aggression, mating behavior, parental care, communication, and the complexities of living in groups and families. We will learn how natural selection operates on individuals in a social context. We study less material in more depth, with many videos. This class is a lot of work, a lot of fun, and you will never look at an animal in the same way.

What will you learn? This course is about how animals behave in their environment. You will learn to be skeptical and critical of logically incomplete arguments. You will learn how to formulate and evaluate hypotheses. You will learn to evaluate material for accuracy in data, in logic, and in conclusions. You will understand the nature of scientific evidence. You will learn to understand how natural selection operates, particularly on behavior. One of the most effective ways of learning is to teach and communicate the material you just learned. In this class you will learn to teach, to write, to collaborate, and to engage in the dialogue of Wikipedia.

Student	Assigned	Reviewing
Wikijmedina
Salazarjhan
Spirit LG	Liolaemus chiliensis
Williamalewis
LewisWang4
Edickerson1
Minwoo.kwon
Nvytrinh
Ritu27
Ritusidgal
Evanmbradley
Akhil.kesaraju	Diploderma swinhonis
Joshuachenwustl
Quill Quips
Eliyamak
Eptlizard
Kellencking
Syoon2100
Vportugal
Emshen526
Chukka.vennela

Timeline

Week 3

Course meetings

Tuesday, 14 September 2021 | Thursday, 16 September 2021

Assignment - First assignment, Behavioral Ecology 472

Wikipedia allows for any user to create or edit an entry without registering, but registration is required for this assignment so that we can confirm that you created the entry. To create an account, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page.

In the upper right corner is a link entitled Log In / create account. Click on the link and follow the directions listed to create your account. After you have created your username, you will be redirected to a page, where you should see “Login successful.”

Do ALL the tutorials. These are much more reliable than the instructions below. Be sure you accomplish the things in the instructions below, however.

1. Create a User Page

You should also create a User Page, so people know who you are. Click on your newly created account name, which appears in red in the upper right hand corner of the Wikipedia page. You will then be redirected to your user page, which should have a header that reads “User:<Your Username>” In order to create your user page, click on the link towards the upper right hand corner where it says “Create.”

After clicking on the “Create” link, you will be redirected to a page with a header that reads “Editing User:<Your Username>” with a large text box. In the large text box compose 2-3 sentences about yourself, indicating that you are a student, and highlight your interests and areas of Wikipedia you wish to contribute. You can say that you are a Wash U student working in particular on pages about butterflies and moths. You can also tell something else about yourself to inspire others to start contributing, or mention any other areas you might contribute on in the future. This is your chance to show real people write for Wikipedia.

Scroll below and click “Save Page.” At this point the link containing your account name will change in color from red to blue indicating that a linked page now exists. In general, anything written by editors with identities is more trustworthy than information in red, throughout Wikipedia. Here is an example of a user page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Agelaia.

2. Put a photo of yourself on your page (Optional)

To put a photo of yourself on your page, when viewing your user page (by clicking on your account name at the upper right hand corner of the Wikipedia page) click on Edit near the top right of the page. Above the short description of yourself, input the following code:

{{Infobox person

| name = <your name>

| image = <photo_file_name.jpg>

| nationality =

| birth_date =

| birth_place =

| death_date =

| death_place =

| occupation =

| salary =

| networth =

| children =

| website =

| module =

| module3 =

This user was a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador.

}}

Put your name where it says <your name> and replace the <photo_file_name.jpg> with a file name you would like for your photo followed by a .jpg extension (e.g. CVern.jpg). Save your changes.

When you view your user page, you will notice that the photo has not shown up yet. This is because you need to upload an (open source—e.g. a photo taken by yourself that you don’t mind sharing (see below)) image of yourself. To do so, click on the file name you just created in the infobox you just created. This will take you to a file creation page, where you can upload your photo. Before you submit, make sure to give some details on where the photo is from and provide licensing info through the licensing pull down menu below the “upload file” button (suggestion is Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0).

4. Create a Sandbox (Click on “Sandbox” on the upper right corner of Wikipedia)

The sandbox feature of Wikipedia is a place where you can start and edit your contribution until you are ready to fully release it on Wikipedia. You will create a sandbox inside your user space. This sandbox will allow you to practice Wikipedia syntax and editing without being fully held to the standards in Wikipedia:Manual of Style. You can work on your article in this space at first, but when assignments are due, they must be uploaded to fully visible Wikipedia.

Instructions:

1. Go to your user page (space you are in after you click on your Username) and click “Edit” (among the options on top right).

2. In the textbox go to the line after the sentences describing yourself and type

My sandbox

. This will create a sandbox link with an illustrative picture.

3. Scroll below the box and click on "Save page" to save the changes.

Do what it takes so you show up on the course page:

Assignment - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:

Editing Wikipedia pages 1–5
Evaluating Wikipedia

Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia

Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.)
It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.

Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 4

Course meetings

Tuesday, 21 September 2021 | Thursday, 23 September 2021

Assignment - Review 5 existing Wikipedia pages on Spiders

Assignment 2: Review of Wikipedia assignment

When is it due? 13 October 2020

70 Points

What exactly do I turn in? You turn in a Word document on Canvas that contains your comments on five Wikipedia pages of different fly species, along with a link to one comment you posted on a Wikipedia Talk page. Call it <lastnamefirstname>Wiki13October

In this assignment you will find and read five organism-based entries and evaluate them, as described below. You will also put something on the talk pages of each organism to get comfortable with adding information. It does not have to be too detailed.

Join the WikiProject Spiders

WikiProject pages are places to discuss the overall organization of knowledge in Wikipedia on a certain topic and to alert WikiProject communities about the importance of developing pages in a particular area. This is not the place to discuss details relating to specific changes you will make to a page if the overall categorization of the knowledge makes sense.

According to the WikiProject Guide, a WikiProject is a group of editors that collaborate on encyclopedic work at collection of pages devoted to the management of a specific topic or family of topics within Wikipedia. It is not a place to write or discuss the details of specific encyclopedia articles, but a resource to help coordinate, organize, and share ideas about article writing.

Your contribution should make your aim clear to other Wikipedia editors. Keep in mind that other Wikipedia editors may access your user page to better understand your contributions.

Instructions:

1. To begin, find a WikiProject that is relevant to your contribution. There is one for spiders It is very useful because it is a place to list species needing pages and suggests formats for articles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spiders

a. Since we are all working on spiders, everyone should join the same project. Add your username to the list of participants for this WikiProject and any other you wish to join.

b. All WikiProjects are different, but instructions for adding yourself to the project list of participants can usually be located by looking through the WikiProject page's outline. To add yourself to the spider WikiProject list, edit the participant list and add your username in alphabetical order.

c. Once you are a member of the project, you should contribute to that project's discussion page to notify the community of your planned work.

2. Write brief commentaries on 5 entries. You will post at least part of one of your commentaries on the corresponding Wiki page’s Talk page. These do not all need to be put on Wikipedia, unless you want to.

a. Consider the criteria for Good Article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GACR#Criteria/ , and evaluate where this piece hits or misses the mark in answering the questions in the rubric. We have had class members in the past actually make it to Good Article and one who made it to Featured Article.

Look at entries on 5 spiders. Each student should do five different species, but you don’t have to check around with everyone. Just choose independently. You should pick organisms that have fairly thorough entries to do this assignment. Here are some examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drosophila_melanogaster, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Housefly, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsetse_fly . Do not use any of these examples to do the assignment, but you should look at them to get a feel for good work, though the tsetse fly one has some issues. One of the things to be careful about is that there be enough behavioral information on the spider you choose. Most of the Wikipedia pages I’ve looked at have more other topics.

One way to find flies is to pick a journal like Animal Behaviour, Behavioral Ecology, Behavioral Ecology, and Sociobiology, or Annual Review of Ecology and Evolution and then do a search for spider in the whole journal. This will point you to flies that people study from the behavioral perspective.

Write a paragraph evaluating the entry. Consider how complete the entry is. Note missing categories focusing on behavior. Often a good way to tell what is missing is to compare different entries. Comment on the writing. Look at the Talk, History and Discussion sections and comment on what you see there. Do you agree with the comments? Do you agree with the importance ranking? Your comments on each entry will be about 200 words. Remember, you do not need to solve the problems you see, or do any research. The purpose of this assignment is to get you comfortable with looking at and evaluating Wikipedia entries in the area of your specialty. Details are expanded under grading rubric, below

Turn in the document showing your work. Submit to Canvas. Deadline 13 October midnight.

When you submit your comment to Wikipedia, tell us with a link in your document.

Grading rubric: 70 points in all, 14 points per organism, 5 organisms

For each organism: Name the organism and give a brief overview of the entry

5 points: What are the strengths of this entry? What have you learned that is most interesting?

5 points: Name 3 general categories in the outline that are missing and could be included. Explain why for each.

4 points: Look at the talk page. Comment on the details here, including the ranking and importance of the article.

Full points will be given to entries in each category that are thorough, exhibit careful thinking, and tie to the material of the course. Your writing should be intelligible without going back to the original Wikipedia page.

Assignment - Evaluate Wikipedia

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.

Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings.
Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
- Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~~~~.

In class - Discussion: What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

Week 5

Course meetings

Tuesday, 28 September 2021 | Thursday, 30 September 2021

Assignment - Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.

Week 6

Course meetings

Tuesday, 5 October 2021 | Thursday, 7 October 2021

Assignment - Write a Wikipedia article on a spider species with 7 refs and 1500 words

WikiProject Assignment 3

Behavioral Ecology, Biology 472, Strassmann

In this assignment you will add at least 7 scientific references and at least 1500 words to an existing Wikipedia entry, or begin a new one. View the 1500 words as a minimum. An excellent A+ contribution will have much more. Each person should do her own independent assignment. Only after they are done does the rest of the team check the work. This is not a group assignment. However you can talk with each other to help you decide what to work on.

When is it due? 20 October 11:59 PM

What is it worth? It is worth 150 points out of the 700 total for the entire Wikipedia assignment.

What exactly do I turn in You turn in a document on Canvas named <lastnamefirstname>Wiki20October with the following:

1. Your name.

2. Names of others in your group (one or two names), and what they did on your paper.

3. Your organism.

4. Links to your Wikipedia entry, which should be live on Wikipedia.

5. A paragraph describing exactly how you exercised your fact checking, writing, or Wikipedia expertise. If asked, you should be prepared to provide further documentation on this, so save copies of edited work or similar. (20 points).

6. Paste into the document your at least 1500-word entry along with the 7 references (150 points).

What do I do? In this assignment you will further use your expertise in behavioral ecology to improve Wikipedia. Focus on the entry of a single organism under the Diptera WikiProject that you have chosen. We provide a list of likely flies with an incomplete Wikipedia page and enough scholarly references, but you are free to choose others if there is enough information on them. The organism that you choose should have information in the literature on its behavior. You should discuss what exactly the animal does that is of interest and why they have evolved to do it. Remember to follow the general format of Wikipedia with lots of headings. Also, be sure to follow the order of topics specified by the Diptera project and by our class. The writing should have as parallel a structure as possible.

Should I add headings in the Wikipedia entry? Yes. Wikipedia prefers relatively short chunks of text, 200 to 600 words. Headings are key to helping readers navigate through the page. You should also be sure to keep the outline at the beginning of the entry up to date, reflecting any new headings you have added.

Can I change areas of the Wikipedia entry on this organism that are not behavior? Yes, you can change anything you like on this or other organisms. You may add things that are missing like geographic distribution, diet, taxonomy, appearance, or links to Wikimedia photos, for example. Your goal is to provide a complete Wikipedia entry on your fly, with focus on behavior. Anything you add should follow the Wikipedia principles, hold a neutral tone, and be well referenced.

Can you give me some examples of good work on Wikipedia in this general area? OK, here are a few. The entry for the monarch butterfly is pretty good, but lacks much behavioral data. One of my students, Ben Ong, brought the piece on the American white ibis a lot of the way towards being a Good Article, then a Featured Article. You can reach this status. After all, it was done mostly by a Rice University undergraduate.

I want all of you to reach the standards of Good Articles, given here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GACR#Criteria.

How do I get a draft of the assignment from my partners so I can serve my role as Wikipedia expert, writing expert, or fact checker? Ask them for their assignment. Give them your assignment so they can do their role. Leave time to do this before the final deadline, because you will have to revise your entry according to their comments, or get help uploading the work. You might consider having a last session together so you can contribute your role efficiently and chat with them as you do it. Teamwork works well with frequent face-to-face contact.

Do I have to actually change something on Wikipedia? Yes. Add your modifications to the appropriate page. Include the course banner. Briefly describe what you have done on the talk page for your topic.

Do I have to include images of the organism? Yes, and these must not be taken from any source that is not Creative Commons licensed. The best way to be sure is to search for images on Wikimedia and then use only those with clear licensing as Creative Commons and available. Please look at the original source of your photo and make sure it fits in with the correct commons licenses allowed for Wikipedia (see link below). Also make sure that you license it correctly when you upload to Wikipedia. This has been a stumbling block in the past, so right from the beginning be sure you can get a good, open source picture of your fly.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing

Can I delete stuff that is already there in the article? Yes, you should delete anything that is incorrect, or is not referenced. You should also delete anything that is under copyright and taken improperly. Be sure you explain your deletes in the talk page.

Can I copy information that I find from another source? No, that would be plagiarism. You can cannot copy content entirely, nor can you just change the words around while keeping the general structure and ideas of another person. If you do this, the penalty will be severe, in accord with Wash U rules. If you detect plagiarism in any work already up on Wikipedia, or by a classmate, tell me or your Friday discussion leader.

Grading rubric: 150 points

Points	Item
10	Describe how you fulfilled your role (writing, Wikipedia, fact checker) for the others in your group. Be specific.
10	Describe what others in your group did for you (writing, Wikipedia, fact checker) and how you responded to their advice.
	Complete right hand box with taxonomic info and photo(s)
	Overview is one of the sections at the very beginning. See instructions§ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section
130	Sections behavior through humans add a least 13 thoughtful sections which should include the Taxobox if it does not already exist and the overview (max 10 points each). Follow the outline order and do not change the heading wording but you can add new headings.
	You must add at least 7 references and 1000 words
20	Bonus for 5 extra sections & excellence, typically with more words (extra credit)
	Work that gets full points will be carefully referenced, clear, well written, and detailed.

In class - Discussion: Thinking about sources and plagiarism

Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?

Assignment - Choose your topic / Find your sources

It's time to choose an article and assign it to yourself.

Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
Find an article from the list of "Available Articles" on the Articles tab on this course page. When you find the one you want to work on, click Select to assign it to yourself.
In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
- Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page.
- Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.

Week 7

Course meetings

Thursday, 14 October 2021

Assignment - Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
- A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article?

Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.

Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 8

Course meetings

Tuesday, 19 October 2021 | Thursday, 21 October 2021

Assignment - Peer review of three classmate's articles, Behavioral Ecology 472

WikiProject Assignment 4 Peer review of 3 entries

Behavioral Ecology, Biology 472, Strassmann

In this assignment you will review 3 entries by other students that are not in your editing group.

When is it due? 3 November 11:59 PM

What is it worth? It is worth 60 points out of the 700 total for the entire Wikipedia assignment.

What exactly do I turn in? You turn in a document on Canvas named <lastnamefirstname>Wiki3Nov.doc with the following:

1. Your name.

2. Names and links to the 3 entries you review. Your Friday Discussion Leader will assign the articles for you to look at. They will be from people in your discussion section but not in your editing group.

3. A clear description of what you have changed, what we should look for.

What do I do? By now you should be fairly comfortable with editing on Wikipedia. This is your chance to help out your fellow classmates, and shine yourself. It is also a chance to read more broadly than your single chapter, even if it is just out of the textbook. Use your expertise to read your classmates’s entries. Feel free to add material, edit material, and put comments on the talk pages. It is hard to give a specific rubric as to what you should do, because you will encounter variable entries. What you should do is improve them. You can do this by adding material that is missing, by editing the writing or organization to make it more clear, and by contributing to the talk page. Look again at the criteria for Good Articles, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria, and think about where this one meets the mark or falls short. Of course, besides these criteria we have specific interests in improving the behavioral side of the entries.

Should I add headings in the Wikipedia entry? Yes, if necessary. Headings are valuable and your perspective may point to additional headings that may be needed. Just be sure that if you put more in, you also add them to the outline at the beginning.

Can I change areas of the Wikipedia entry on this organism that are not behavior? Yes, you can change anything you like on this or other organisms. You may add things that are missing like geographic distribution, diet, taxonomy, appearance, or links to Wikimedia photos, for example. Anything you add should follow the Wikipedia principles, hold a neutral tone, and be well referenced. Remember, the more words we add, the more likely our class will shine among all Wikipedia classes.

Do I have to actually change something on Wikipedia? Yes. Add your modifications to the appropriate page. Include the course banner (see the bottom of the course Wikipedia page for directions), if it is not already there. Briefly describe what you have done on the talk page of each of the articles you peer review.

Grading rubric: 60 points in all, 20 points per article, 3 articles

For each article:

5 points: Contribute to the Talk page. This can be comments about the article and/or explaining what you changed in the article.

15 points: Make meaningful comments and changes to help improve the article.

In class - Discussion: Thinking about Wikipedia

What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?

Assignment - Expand your draft

Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
If you'd like a Wikipedia Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.

Assignment - Peer review and copy edit

First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign them to yourself to review.
Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?

Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 9

Course meetings

Tuesday, 26 October 2021 | Thursday, 28 October 2021

Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Wikipedia Expert if you have any questions.

Week 10

Course meetings

Tuesday, 2 November 2021 | Thursday, 4 November 2021

Assignment - Write another 1500 words with 7 references, Behavioral Ecology 472

WikiProject Assignment 5

Behavioral Ecology, Biology 472, Strassmann

In this assignment you will write about another spider with 7 references and 1500 words. Each person does their own independent assignment. Only after they are done does the rest of the team check the work. This is not a group assignment. However you can talk with each other to help you decide what to work on.

When is it due? 17 November 11:59 PM

What is it worth? It is worth 150 points out of the 700 total for the entire Wikipedia assignment.

This assignment is exactly like Assignment 3, so follow those instructions.

Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly.

Creating a new article?

Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
You can also review the Sandboxes and Mainspace online training.

Assignment - Did You Know

Optional: For new articles or qualifying expansions of stubs, compose a one-sentence “hook,” nominate it for “Did you know,” (see the DYK instructions handout) and monitor the nomination for any issues identified by other editors. Wiki Education staff can provide support for this process.

Handout: "Did You Know" submissions

Week 11

Course meetings

Tuesday, 9 November 2021 | Thursday, 11 November 2021

Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take Contributing Images and Media Files training before you upload an image.

Week 12

Course meetings

Tuesday, 16 November 2021 | Thursday, 18 November 2021

Assignment - Peer Review 3 entries

Peer review of 3 classmate's articles, Behavioral Ecology 472

Assignment

WikiProject Assignment 6 Peer review of 3 entries

Behavioral Ecology, Biology 472, Strassmann

In this assignment you will review 3 entries by other students that are not in your editing group.

When is it due? Thursday 1 December 11:59 PM

What is it worth? It is worth 60 points out of the 700 total for the entire Wikipedia assignment.

This assignment is exactly like assignment 4, so refer to the instructions there.

Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Wikipedia Expert at any time if you need further help!

Week 13

Course meetings

Tuesday, 23 November 2021

Assignment - Respond to peer review comments, revise, polish, and link, Behavioral Ecolo

WikiProject Assignment 7 Revise and link

Behavioral Ecology, Biology 472, Strassmann

When is it due? 8 December 11:59 PM

What is it worth? It is worth 100 points out of the 700 total for the entire Wikipedia assignment.

What exactly do I turn in? You turn in a document on Canvas named <lastnamefirstname>Wiki8 Dec with the following:

1. Your name.

2. Names and links to the 10 entries that you visit and change, adding links to your entry as appropriate, also modifying the text as needed to make the link relevant.

3. A clear description of what you have changed, what we should look for.

4. A sentence or two on your opinions of the Good and Featured articles you have looked at.

5. Three new articles you think should be nominated for Good Article, can be from the class or elsewhere. Please do not nominate them yourselves, just let us know which ones and why. You can modify those articles to bring them up to Good Article status. They may need help in areas not directly relevant to behavior, for example. By now you should be familiar with reading the refereed literature. This is where improvements should come from.

What do I do?

1. With this assignment, you keep modifying and adding to your previous work. You add links. You evaluate other work.

2. You also make it more part of the fabric of knowledge by visiting other sites and adding links to your entry at the other site. Do this for 10 entries, so you will have those 10 links into your site. Apparently there are not likely to be 10 entries that are close to your material that are Good Articles or Featured Articles, so just find 10 other articles that can link to your area. They can be animals close to ones you wrote about, or topics. So, you could all put a link to your page from the Behavioral Ecology page, or the Evolution page. Do the same for Parental Care, Parent-Offspring Conflict, or Sexual Selection. The important thing is to add links from elsewhere to your page. But don’t link to super general pages since these will be taken down.

3. Find 5 articles as close as possible to your area that are Good Articles, or Featured Articles. Learn what they have that yours does not. Write a paragraph for Canvas that describes what you have found. Here is a list of all the Good Articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles/Natural_sciences#Biology_and_medicine

Here is a list of the Featured articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_articles

Look for the section on animals.

Check out in particular these:

cattle egret: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cattle_Egret/

ruff: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruff/

whit-winged fairywren: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White-winged_Fairywren/

But your article will have much more behavior than these do. Here is a featured article on a fly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse-fly . Please work to this standard.

4. Now you are more experienced as to what a Good Article is, fix your entry so it meets the GA standards. This may well involve adding content that is not behavior. This is fine. Here is the link to what a Good Article is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles/

5. Please do not nominate your entry for Good Article if you feel it has reached this stage, but let us know if you think it should be nominated. Ultimately you will nominate your article for GA if we agree it is good enough. This is because it is the nominator that does additional work required by the Wikipedia community.

6 Find 3 other articles (from class or not) that you think should be nominated for Good Article. Write a few sentences on why they should be nominated. Make any changes to make them fit GA status.

Points	Item
20 Points	Names and links to 10 entries that you linked your article to, with description of where you added your link.
40 Points	Description of what you changed in your article.
20 Points	Your opinions on the 5 Good and Featured articles you looked at.
20 Points	Names, links and reasoning of 3 articles you think should be nominated for Good Article status.

Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.

Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!

Assignment - Reflective essay

Write a reflective essay (2–5 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:

Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions?
Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article?
Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?

Week 14

Course meetings

Tuesday, 30 November 2021 | Thursday, 2 December 2021

Assignment - Final polishing of your work, Behavioral Ecology 472

WikiProject Assignment 8

Behavioral Ecology 472 Strassmann

In this assignment you will put the final touches on your entry, responding to all comments, pushing it towards Good Article, or even Featured Article status if you have passed Good Article. You will also visit the talk pages and other of your colleague’s pages, helping the entire class achieve their best possible work.

When is it due? 15 December 11:59 PM

What is it worth? It is worth 90 points out of the 700 total for the entire Wikipedia assignment.

What exactly do I turn in? <lastnamefirstname>Wiki15Dec

1. Your name.

2. Links to your Wikipedia entry.

3. Links to the Wikipedia entries of your colleagues that you modified or commented on.

What do I do? In this assignment you continue to modify your entry, responding further to reader comments. You may want to add links, references, headers, images, polish the entry, and work hard to meet the needs of getting it to GA status. You should also help your colleagues by commenting further on their articles, helping them attain GA status. Look back through all the comments, do some more reading, bring the piece up to your highest possible level.

What if other Wikipedians have taken down or totally changed my entry? Look at why they did this. If it is because there were serious problems with it, fix them. If it is because the others felt the material did not fit, and you disagree, argue with them. Get help from others in the class to participate. Do your best to keep your material up there, even if modified. Try to understand what is going on. Ask us. You can also work on modifying and expanding what others have put up. I do not think this will be a big problem if you have worked on an animal for which there is little information and done it properly.

Should I add more headings in the Wikipedia entry? Yes, if necessary. Wikipedia prefers relatively short chunks of text, 200 to 600 words, it seems. Headings are key to helping readers navigate through the page. You should also be sure to keep the outline at the beginning of the entry up to date, reflecting any new headings you have added.

Why are links so important? Where should I add them? You should add links both in your piece and in other pieces so they link to your piece. But don’t add links to very general things only marginally related to your topic. If your animal occurs in Europe, for example, do not put in a link on the Europe page. It will cause an uproar. The Wikipedia community is very vigilant. But the internet is all about links, so the more appropriate ones you put in, the better. It is how we get around, besides basic searches.

Points	Item
35 Points	Link to your first Wikipedia entry with explanations of what you changed and what comments you addressed.
35 Points	Link to your second Wikipedia entry with explanations of what you changed and what comments you addressed.
20 Points	Links to other Wikipedia articles you commented on and an explanation of what you commented and/or changed.

Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading. Remember, you can always keep working on your articles. Some students have worked long into the spring semester to achieve Good Article status.

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 {{student table row|Vportugal||}}
 {{student table row|Emshen526||}}
+{{student table row|Chukka.vennela||}}
 {{end of students table}}
 {{start of course timeline}}