Jump to content

Poverty: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 104179474 by 69.255.113.153 (talk)
Line 85: Line 85:


===Social===
===Social===
[[Image:A gipsy woman with her dog.JPG|right|thumb|350px|A homeless gipsy woman with her dog in a street of Rome]]
* Lack of [[Freedom (political)|freedom]] and social [[oppression]].
* Lack of [[Freedom (political)|freedom]] and social [[oppression]].
* Lack of social integration. For example, arising from immigration (see related article, [[Economic impact of immigration to Canada]]).
* Lack of social integration. For example, arising from immigration (see related article, [[Economic impact of immigration to Canada]]).

Revision as of 12:16, 31 January 2007

A boy from an East Cipinang trash dump slum in Jakarta, Indonesia shows his find.

Poverty is a condition in which a person or community is deprived of, or lacks the essentials for a minimum standard of well-being and life. Since poverty is understood in many senses,[1] these essentials may be material resources such as food, safe drinking water, and shelter, or they may be social resources such as access to information, education, health care, social status, political power[2], or the opportunity to develop meaningful connections with other people in society[3].

Poverty may also be defined in relative terms. In this view income disparities or wealth disparities are seen as an indicator of poverty and the condition of poverty is linked to questions of scarcity and distribution of resources and power. Poverty may be defined by a government or organization for legal purposes, see Poverty threshold.

Poverty is also a type of religious vow, a state that may be taken on voluntarily in keeping with practices of piety.

Etymology

The word "poor" came via Old French from Latin pauper, and the word "poverty" came via Old French from Latin pauperitas. Latin pauper came from pau- = "small" and pario = "I give birth to" and originally would have referred to unproductive farmland or female livestock which failed to breed as much as wanted.

Measuring poverty

File:Percentage population living on less than 1 dollar day.png
Map of world poverty by country, showing percentage of population living on less than 1 dollar per day. Unfortunately, information is missing for some countries.
World map showing Life expectancy.
World map showing the Human Development Index.
World map showing the Gini coefficient, a measure of income inequality.
The percentage of the world's population living on less than $1 per day has halved in twenty years. However, most of this improvement has occurred in East and South Asia. The graph shows the 1981-2001 period.
Life expectancy has been increasing and converging for most of the world. Sub-Saharan Africa has recently seen a decline, partly related to the AIDS epidemic. The graph shows the 1950-2005 period.

Although the most severe poverty is in the developing world, there is evidence of poverty in every region. In developed countries, this condition results in wandering homeless people and poor suburbs and ghettos[citation needed]. Poverty may be seen as the collective condition of poor people, or of poor groups, and in this sense entire nation-states are sometimes regarded as poor. To avoid stigma these nations are usually called developing nations[citation needed].

When measured, poverty may be absolute or relative poverty. Absolute poverty refers to a set standard which is consistent over time and between countries. An example of an absolute measurement would be the percentage of the population eating less food than is required to sustain the human body (approximately 2000-2500 calories per day).

The World Bank defines extreme poverty as living on less than US$ (PPP) 1 per day, and moderate poverty as less than $2 a day. It has been estimated that in 2001, 1.1 billion people had consumption levels below $1 a day and 2.7 billion lived on less than $2 a day. The proportion of the developing world's population living in extreme economic poverty has fallen from 28 percent in 1990 to 21 percent in 2001. Much of the improvement has occurred in East and South Asia. In Sub-Saharan Africa GDP/capita shrank with 14 percent and extreme poverty increased from 41 percent in 1981 to 46 percent in 2001. Other regions have seen little or no change. In the early 1990s the transition economies of Europe and Central Asia experienced a sharp drop in income. Poverty rates rose to 6 percent at the end of the decade before beginning to recede. [4] There are various criticisms of these measurements.[5]

Some economists such as Guy Pfeffermann say that other indicators of "absolute poverty" are also improving. Life expectancy has greatly increased in the developing world since WWII and is starting to close the gap to the developed world where the improvement has been smaller. Even in Sub-Saharan Africa, the least developed region, life expectancy increased from 30 years before World War II to a peak of about 50 years before the HIV pandemic and other diseases started to force it down to the current level of 47 years. Child mortality has decreased in every developing region of the world[6]. The proportion of the world's population living in countries where per-capita food supplies are less than 2,200 calories (9,200 kilojoules) per day decreased from 56% in the mid-1960s to below 10% by the 1990s. Between 1950 and 1999, global literacy increased from 52% to 81% of the world. Women made up much of the gap: Female literacy as a percentage of male literacy has increased from 59% in 1970 to 80% in 2000. The percentage of children not in the labor force has also risen to over 90% in 2000 from 76% in 1960. There are similar trends for electric power, cars, radios, and telephones per capita, as well as the proportion of the population with access to clean water.[7]

Relative poverty views poverty as socially defined and dependent on social context. In this case, the number of people counted as poor could increase while their income rise. A relative measurement would be to compare the total wealth of the poorest one-third of the population with the total wealth of richest 1% of the population. There are several different income inequality metrics, one example is the Gini coefficient.

In many developed countries the official definition of poverty used for statistical purposes is based on relative income. As such many critics argue that poverty statistics measure inequality rather than material deprivation or hardship. For instance, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, 46% of those in "poverty" in the U.S. own their own home (with the average poor person's home having three bedrooms, with one and a half baths, and a garage).[8] Furthermore, the measurements are usually based on a person's yearly income and frequently take no account of total wealth. The main poverty line used in the OECD and the European Union is based on "economic distance", a level of income set at 50% of the median household income. The US poverty line is more arbitrary. It was created in 1963-64 and was based on the dollar costs of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's "economy food plan" multiplied by a factor of three. The multiplier was based on research showing that food costs then accounted for about one third of the total money income. This one-time calculation has since been annually updated for inflation.[9]

Income inequality for the world as a whole is diminishing. A 2002 study by Xavier Sala-i-Martin finds that this is driven mainly, but not fully, by the extraordinary growth rate of the incomes of the 1.2 billion Chinese citizens. However, unless Africa achieve economic growth, then China, India, the OECD and the rest of middle-income and rich countries will diverge away from it, and global inequality will rise. Thus, the economic growth of the African continent should be the priority of anyone concerned with increasing global income inequality.[10][dubiousdiscuss][11]

Even if poverty may be lessening for the world as a whole, it continues to be an enormous problem:

  • One third of deaths - some 18 million people a year or 50,000 per day - are due to poverty-related causes. That's 270 million people since 1990, the majority women and children, roughly equal to the population of the US.
  • Every year nearly 11 million children die before their fifth birthday.
  • In 2001, 1.1 billion people had consumption levels below $1 a day and 2.7 billion lived on less than $2 a day
  • 800 million people go to bed hungry every day.

The World Bank's "Voices of the Poor" [12], based on research with over 20,000 poor people in 23 countries, identifies a range of factors which poor people consider elements of poverty. Most important are those necessary for material well-being, especially food. Many others relate to social rather than material issues.

  • precarious livelihoods
  • excluded locations
  • gender relationships
  • problems in social relationships
  • lack of security
  • abuse by those in power
  • dis-empowering institutions
  • limited capabilities, and
  • weak community organizations.

Causes of poverty

File:P7032101 small2.jpg
A homeless Frenchman in Paris.

Many different factors have been cited to explain why poverty occurs. However, no single explanation has gained universal acceptance. Some possible factors include:

Material

  • Natural factors such as climate or environment[13]
  • Overpopulation[citation needed]. Note that population growth slows or even become negative as poverty is reduced due to the demographic transition.[14]
  • Geographic factors, for example access to of fertile land, fresh water, minerals, energy, and other natural resources. Presence or absence of natural features helping or limiting communication, such mountains, deserts, sailable rivers, or coastline. Historically, geography has prevented or slowed the spread of new technology to areas such as the Americas and Sub-Saharan Africa. The climate also limits what crops and farm animals may be used on similarly fertile lands.[15]
  • On the other hand, research on the resource curse has found that countries with an abundance of natural resources creating quick wealth from exports tend to have less long-term prosperity than countries with less of these natural resources.
  • Inadequate nutrition in childhood in poor nations may lead to physical and mental stunting that, in turn, may lead to economic problems. (Hence, it is both a cause and an effect)[16]
  • Disease, specifically diseases of poverty: AIDS[17], malaria[18], and tuberculosis and others overwhelmingly afflict developing nations, which perpetuate poverty by diverting individual, community, and national health and economic resources from investment and productivity.[19] Further, many tropical nations are affected by parasites like malaria, schistosomiasis, and trypanosomiasis that are not present in temperate climates. The Tsetse fly makes it very difficult to use many animals in agriculture in afflicted regions.

Economic

Political

  • Lacking rule of law.[20]
  • Lacking democracy.[21]
  • Lacking infrastructure[22].
  • Lacking health care.[23]
  • Lacking education.[24]
  • Government corruption.[25]
  • Tax havens which tax their own citizens and companies but not those from other nations and refuse to disclose information necessary for foreign taxation. This enables large scale political corruption, tax evasion, and organized crime in the foreign nations.[26]
  • Historical factors, for example imperialism and colonialism[27][28][29].
  • Capitalism, Socialism, Communism, Monarchy, Fascism and Totalitarianism have all been named as causes by scholars writing from different perspectives. For example, poorly functioning property rights is seen by some as a cause of poverty[30], while socialists see property rights itself as a cause of poverty.[31]
  • Lacking free trade. In particular, the very high subsidies to and protective tariffs for agriculture in the developed world. For example, almost half of the budget of the European Union goes to agricultural subsidies, mainly to large farmers and agribusinesses, which form a powerful lobby.[32] Japan gave 47 billon dollars in 2005 in subsidies to its agricultural sector,[33] nearly four times the amount it gave in total foreign aid.[34] The US gives 3.9 billon dollars each year in subsidies to its cotton sector, including 25,000 growers, three times more in subsidies than the entire USAID budget for Africa’s 500 million people.[35] This drains the taxed money and increases the prices for the consumers in developed world; decreases competition and efficiency; prevents exports by more competitive agricultural and other sectors in the developed world due to retaliatory trade barriers; and undermines the very type of industry in which the developing countries do have comparative advantages.[36]

Social

A homeless gipsy woman with her dog in a street of Rome

Effects of poverty

A starving female child during the Nigerian-Biafran war of the late 1960s. The abdomen is paradoxically swollen due to Kwashiorkor or severe protein malnutrition.

Some effects of poverty may also be causes, as listed above, thus creating a "poverty cycle" and complicating the subject further:

Poverty reduction

In politics, the fight against poverty is usually regarded as a social goal and many governments have — secondarily at least — some dedicated institutions or departments.

Economic growth

World GDP per capita rapidly increased beginning with the Industrial Revolution.
  • The anti-poverty strategy of the World Bank depends heavily on reducing poverty through the promotion of economic growth[45]. However, some consider this approach does not actively or directly work to reduce or eliminate poverty.[citation needed] The World Bank argues that an overview of many studies show that:
    • Growth is fundamental for poverty reduction, and in principle growth as such does not affect inequality.
    • Growth accompanied by progressive distributional change is better than growth alone.
    • High initial income inequality is a brake on poverty reduction.
    • Poverty itself is also likely to be a barrier for poverty reduction; and wealth inequality seems to predict lower future growth rates.[46]
  • The Global Competitiveness Report, the Ease of Doing Business Index, and the Index of Economic Freedom are annual reports, often used in academic research, ranking the worlds nations on factors argued to increase econmic growth and reduce poverty.
  • Business groups see the reduction of barriers to the creation of new businesses [47], or reducing barriers for existing business, as having the effect of bringing more people into the formal economy.
  • The 2007 World Bank report "Global Economic Prospects" predicts that in 2030 the number living on less than the equivalent of $1 a day will fall by half, to about 550 million. An average resident of what we used to call the Third World will live about as well as do residents of the Czech or Slovak republics today. However, much of Africa will have difficulty keeping pace with the rest of the developing world and even if conditions there improve in absolute terms, the report warns, Africa in 2030 will be home to a larger proportion of the world's poorest people than it is today.[48]

Direct aid

  • The government can directly help those in need. This has been applied with mixed results in most Western societies during the 20th century in what became known as the welfare state. Especially for those most at risk, such as the elderly and people with disabilities. The help can be for example monetary or food aid.
  • Private charity. This is often formally encouraged within the legal system. For example, charitable trusts and tax deductions for charity.

Improving the social environment and abilities of the poor

A shanty town in Manila, Philippines.

Millennium Development Goals

Eradication of extreme poverty and hunger by 2015 is a Millennium Development Goal. In addition to broader approaches, the Sachs Report (for the UN Millennium Project) [49] proposes a series of "quick wins", approaches identified by development experts which would cost relatively little but could have a major constructive effect on world poverty. The quick wins are:

Foreign aid

Poverty-stricken Women washing their clothes by a Main Road in Mumbai, India.

Most developed nations give foreign aid to developing nations and have produced Poverty Reduction Strategy papers or PRSPs [50]. 61% of Amercians say that combating world hunger should be a very important goal of U.S. foreign policy.[citation needed] Polls have shown that, on average, Americans believe 24% of the federal budget goes to development assistance[51]. In reality, less than 1% of the budget goes to aid.[dubiousdiscuss] Even so, at more than $25 billion in 2005 alone, the U.S. donated more than twice as much money as the next largest donor, Japan.[52] The Borgen Project, an anti-poverty advocacy organization, estimates the annual cost of eliminating starvation and malnutrition globally at $19 billion a year.[53] As a point of comparison, the annual world military spending is over $1000 billion.[54].

Some think tanks and NGOs have argued, however, that Western monetary aid often only serves to increase poverty and social inequality, either because it is conditioned with the implementation of harmful economic policies in the recipient countries [55], or because it's tied with the importing of products from the donor country over cheaper alternatives.[56] Critics also argue that much of the foreign aid is stolen by corrupt govrnments and officials and that higher aid levels erode the quality of governance. Policy become much more oriented toward what will get more aid money than it does towards meeting the needs of the people.[57]

Supporters argue that these problems are solved with better audit of how the aid is used.[58] Aid from non-governmental organizations may be more effective that governmental aid; this may be because it is better at reaching the poor and better controlled at the grassrots leveal.[59]

Other approaches

Some argue for a radical change of the economic system. There are several proposals for a fundamental restructuring of existing economic relations, and many of their supporters argue that their ideas would reduce or even eliminate poverty entirely if they were implemented. Such proposals have been put forward by both left-wing and right-wing groups: socialism, communism, anarchism, libertarianism and participatory economics, among others.

Inequality can be reduced by progressive taxation, wealth tax, and inheritance tax.[citation needed]

In law, there has been a movement to seek to establish the absence of poverty as a human right. [citation needed]

In his book"The End of Poverty"[60], world renowned economist Jeffrey Sachs laid out a plan to eradicate global poverty by the year 2025. Following his recommendations, international organizations such as the Global Solidarity Network are working to help eradicate poverty worldwide with intervention in the areas of housing, food, education, basic health, agricultural inputs, safe drinking water, transportation and communications.

The Poor People's Economic Human Rights Campaign is an organization in the United States working to secure freedom from poverty for all by organizing the poor themselves. The Campaign believes that a human rights framework, based on the value of inherent dignity and worth of all persons, offers the best means by which to organize for a political solution to poverty.

Religious poverty

St. Francis of Assisi renounces his worldly goods in a painting attributed to Giotto di Bondone.

Among some groups, in particular religious groups, poverty is considered a necessary or desirable condition, which must be embraced in order to reach certain spiritual, moral, or intellectual states. Poverty is often understood to be an essential element of renunciation among Buddhists and Jains, whilst in Roman Catholicism it is one of the evangelical counsels, and taken as a vow among certain religious orders. The way poverty is understood among these orders takes a variety of forms. For example, the Franciscan orders have traditionally forgone all individual and corporate forms of ownership. However, whilst individual ownership of goods and wealth is forbidden for Benedictines, following the Rule of St. Benedict, the monastery itself may possess both goods and money, and through history some monasteries have become very rich indeed.

In this context of religious vows, poverty may be understood as a means of self-denial in order to place oneself at the service of others; Pope Honorius III wrote in 1217 that the Dominicans "lived a life of voluntary poverty, exposing themselves to innumerable dangers and sufferings, for the salvation of others". However, following Jesus' warning that riches can be like thorns that choke up the good seed of the word (Matthew 13:22), voluntary poverty is often understood by Christians as of benefit to the individual- a form of self-discipline by which one distances oneself from distractions from God.

See also: Asceticism

References

  1. ^ D Gordon, P Spicker, The International glossary on poverty, Zed Books.
  2. ^ For the Journal of Poverty's statement of purpose:

    Poverty is an overall condition of inadequacy, lacking, and scarcity. It is destitution and deficiency of economic, political, and social resources.

  3. ^ A Glossary for Social Epidemiology Nancy Krieger, PhD Harvard University School of Public Health

    To be impoverished is to lack or be denied adequate resources to participate meaningfully in society

  4. ^ Worldbank.org reference
  5. ^ Institute of Social Analysis
  6. ^ The Eight Losers of Globalization By Guy Pfeffermann. Guy Pfeffermann is the Director of International Finance Corporation's Global Business School Network. This organization is a member of the World Bank Group, which promotes private sector investment in developing and transition countries. 2002.

    It is an area where not only is there little or no consensus among disciplines, but where economists themselves have widely differing views. So, what can one say with a fair degree of certainty about growth and inequality in developing countries? Life expectancy at birth — the most basic and robust of all social indicators — has increased very considerably around the world.

  7. ^ World Development Volume 33, Issue 1 , January 2005, Pages 1-19, Why Are We Worried About Income? Nearly Everything that Matters is Converging
  8. ^ Rector, Robert E. and Johnson, Kirk A., Understanding Poverty in AmericaExecutive Summary, Heritage Foundation, January 15, 2004 No. 1713
  9. ^ US Department of Human Services-FAQ Poverty Guidelines and Poverty
  10. ^ Good News About Poverty New York Times Op-Ed By David Brooks. 2004
  11. ^ The Disturbing "Rise" of Global Income Inequality by Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2001
  12. ^ The World Bank's "Voices of the Poor"
  13. ^ The Geography of Poverty and Wealth by Jeffrey D. Sachs, Andrew D. Mellinger, and John L. Gallup. From Scientific American magazine
  14. ^ Demographic Transition by Keith Montgomery (Shows how population growth slows with industrialization.)
  15. ^ Guns, Germs, and Steel
  16. ^ Hunger and Malnutrition paper by Jere R Behrman, Harold Alderman and John Hoddinott
  17. ^ The long-run economic costs of AIDS: theory and an application to South Africa
  18. ^ The economic and social burden of malaria.
  19. ^ Poverty Issues Dominate WHO Regional Meeting
  20. ^ Ending Mass Poverty by Ian Vásquez
  21. ^ The Democracy Advantage: How Democracies Promote Prosperity and Peace by Morton Halperin, Joseph T. Siegle, Michael M. Weinstein, Joanne J. Myers
  22. ^ Global Competitiveness Report. Infrastructure and Poverty Reduction: Cross-country Evidence Hossein Jalilian and John Weiss. 2004.The paper states that improvements in infrastructure can reduce poverty but they are only effective when coupled with measures that address needs in the area of social capital.

    The results are only illustrative, but indicate the very large orders of magnitude required if poverty reduction is to be through infrastructure improvements alone.

  23. ^ Global Competitiveness Report
  24. ^ Global Competitiveness Report
  25. ^ Transparency International FAQ
  26. ^ Western bankers and lawyers 'rob Africa of $150bn every year
  27. ^ The Paradox of Africa's Poverty By Tirfe Mammo. 1999. ISBN 1569020493. Gives credit to imperialism/colonialism as a cause as one of two major schools of thought.
  28. ^ Long-Run Development and the Legacy of Colonialism in Spanish America
  29. ^ Reflections on Colonial Legacy and Dependency in Indian Vocational Education and Training (VET): a societal and cultural perspective by Madhu Singh
  30. ^ The Mystery of Capital by Hernando de Soto (IMF)
  31. ^ The Communist Manifesto
  32. ^ Oxfam:Stop the dumping!
  33. ^ OECD Producer Support Estimate By Country
  34. ^ OECD Development Aid At a Glance By Region
  35. ^ Cultivating Poverty The Impact of US Cotton Subsidies on Africa
  36. ^ Six Reasons to Kill Farm Subsidies and Trade Barriers
  37. ^ ""U.S. Chamber of Commerce Fact Sheet "". Retrieved 2007-01-17.
  38. ^ See, e.g., "The Moral Doctrine of Poverty". Retrieved 2007-01-17.
  39. ^ "Testimony of Steven Shore, Author, "Beyond the Wall", Before the Government Reform Committee, U.S. House Of Representatives". Unlocking Autism. Retrieved 2007-01-27.
  40. ^ Vikram Patel. "Is Depression a Disease of Poverty?". Regional Health Forum WHO South-East Asia Region. 5 (1).
  41. ^ Urban and Slum Trends in the 21st Century By Eduardo Lopez Moreno and Rasna Warah
  42. ^ Lack of Toilets a Problem for the Poor, U.N. Says By CELIA W. DUGGER. New York Times.November 9, 2006
  43. ^ Dealing with Increased Risk of Natural Disasters: Challenges and Options PK Freeman, M Keen, M Mani - 2003
  44. ^ Social Protection and Risk Management at worldbank.org
  45. ^ PovertyNet worldbank.org
  46. ^ Poverty, Growth, and Inequality worldbank.org
  47. ^ The Doing Business database A member of the World Bank Group
  48. ^ WORLD BANK HAS GOOD NEWS ABOUT FUTURE By ANDREW CASSEL The Philadelphia Inquirer. Dec. 30, 2006
  49. ^ UN Millennium Project
  50. ^ Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) from the IMF
  51. ^ A Turning Point for Globalisation? The Implications for the Global Economy of America's Campaign against Terrorism Lael Brainard. 2002.
  52. ^ OECD Development Aid At A Glance Statistics By Region
  53. ^ borgenproject.org
  54. ^ SIPRI Yearbook 2006
  55. ^ Haiti's rice farmers and poultry growers have suffered greatly since trade barriers were lowered in 1994. By Jane Regan
  56. ^ Tied Aid Strangling Nations, Says U.N. by Thalif Deen

    Tied aid mandates developing nations to buy products only from donor countries as a condition for development assistance..."This has ensured that aid money is eventually ploughed back into the economies of donor nations," says Njoki Njoroge Njehu, director of 50 Years is Enough, a coalition of over 200 grassroots non-governmental organisations (NGOs). "The United States makes sure that 80 cents in every aid dollar is returned to the home country," she told IPS.

  57. ^ MYTH: More Foreign Aid Will End Global Poverty
  58. ^ MYTH: More Foreign Aid Will End Global Poverty
  59. ^ Does Foreign Aid Reduce Poverty? Empirical Evidence from Nongovernmental and Bilateral Aid
  60. ^ The End of Poverty by JEFFREY D. SACHS for time.com

Further reading

  • Atkinson, Anthony B. Poverty in Europe 1998
  • Betson, David M., and Jennifer L. Warlick. "Alternative Historical Trends in Poverty." American Economic Review 88:348-51. 1998. in JSTOR
  • Brady, David "Rethinking the Sociological Measurement of Poverty" Social Forces 81#3 2003, pp. 715-751 Online in Project Muse. Abstract: Reviews shortcomings of the official U.S. measure; examines several theoretical and methodological advances in poverty measurement. Argues that ideal measures of poverty should: (1) measure comparative historical variation effectively; (2) be relative rather than absolute; (3) conceptualize poverty as social exclusion; (4) assess the impact of taxes, transfers, and state benefits; and (5) integrate the depth of poverty and the inequality among the poor. Next, this article evaluates sociological studies published since 1990 for their consideration of these criteria. This article advocates for three alternative poverty indices: the interval measure, the ordinal measure, and the sum of ordinals measure. Finally, using the Luxembourg Income Study, it examines the empirical patterns with these three measures, across advanced capitalist democracies from 1967 to 1997. Estimates of these poverty indices are made available.
  • Buhmann, Brigitte, Lee Rainwater, Guenther Schmaus, and Timothy M. Smeeding. 1988. "Equivalence Scales, Well-Being, Inequality, and Poverty: Sensitivity Estimates Across Ten Countries Using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Database." Review of Income and Wealth 34:115-42.
  • Cox, W. Michael, and Richard Alm. Myths of Rich and Poor 1999
  • Danziger, Sheldon H., and Daniel H. Weinberg. "The Historical Record: Trends in Family Income, Inequality, and Poverty." Pp. 18-50 in Confronting Poverty: Prescriptions for Change, edited by Sheldon H. Danziger, Gary D. Sandefur, and Daniel. H. Weinberg. Russell Sage Foundation. 1994.
  • Firebaugh, Glenn. "Empirics of World Income Inequality." American Journal of Sociology (2000) 104:1597-1630. in JSTOR
  • Gordon, David M. Theories of Poverty and Underemployment: Orthodox, Radical, and Dual Labor Market Perspectives. 1972.
  • Haveman, Robert H. Poverty Policy and Poverty Research. University of Wisconsin Press 1987.
  • John Iceland; Poverty in America: A Handbook University of California Press, 2003
  • Alice O'Connor; "Poverty Research and Policy for the Post-Welfare Era" Annual Review of Sociology, 2000
  • Osberg, Lars, and Kuan Xu. "International Comparisons of Poverty Intensity: Index Decomposition and Bootstrap Inference." The Journal of Human Resources 2000. 35:51-81.
  • Paugam, Serge. "Poverty and Social Exclusion: A Sociological View." Pp. 41-62 in ;;The Future of European Welfare, edited by Martin Rhodes and Yves Meny 1998.
  • Amartya Sen; Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation Oxford University Press, 1982
  • Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom (1999)
  • Smeeding, Timothy M., Michael O'Higgins, and Lee Rainwater. Poverty, Inequality and Income Distribution in Comparative Perspective. Urban Institute Press 1990.
  • Triest, Robert K. "Has Poverty Gotten Worse?" Journal of Economic Perspectives 1998. 12:97-114.

See also

Organizations and campaigns

Template:Link FA