Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh of Austrasia: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Listing at WP:DELSORT under France (FWDS)
Keep
Line 3: Line 3:
:{{la|1=Hugh of Austrasia}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh of Austrasia|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 September 22#{{anchorencode:Hugh of Austrasia}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:{{la|1=Hugh of Austrasia}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh of Austrasia|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 September 22#{{anchorencode:Hugh of Austrasia}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
*Hugh of Austrasia {{Find sources|Hugh of Austrasia}}
*Hughes d'Austrasia {{Find sources|Hughes d'Austrasia}}
*Chuc {{Find sources|Chuc}}
*Chucus {{Find sources|Chucus}}
*Chugus {{Find sources|Chugus}}

I believe that this article should be deleted due to the nature of this article being sourced by nothing but unsourced genealogical entries on findagrave. In fact, if you search on Google for Hugh of Austrasia, all of the first page is nothing but unsourced genealogical sources, or the Wikipedia article.
I believe that this article should be deleted due to the nature of this article being sourced by nothing but unsourced genealogical entries on findagrave. In fact, if you search on Google for Hugh of Austrasia, all of the first page is nothing but unsourced genealogical sources, or the Wikipedia article.


Line 14: Line 20:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Royalty and nobility|list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Qwaiiplayer|Qwaiiplayer]] ([[User talk:Qwaiiplayer|talk]]) 12:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Royalty and nobility|list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Qwaiiplayer|Qwaiiplayer]] ([[User talk:Qwaiiplayer|talk]]) 12:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/France|list of France-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Qwaiiplayer|Qwaiiplayer]] ([[User talk:Qwaiiplayer|talk]]) 12:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/France|list of France-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Qwaiiplayer|Qwaiiplayer]] ([[User talk:Qwaiiplayer|talk]]) 12:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)</small>

*'''Keep'''. See the text and the references in the corresponding article in the French Wikipedia, [[:fr:Hugues (maire du palais)]] Automatically notable as either the equivalent of a cabinet minister or as a ''de facto'' ruler of [[Austrasia]]. I added {{tl|Find sources}} for different versions of his name. <span style="font-family: Times;">[[User:Eastmain|Eastmain]] ([[User talk:Eastmain|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Eastmain|contribs]])</span> 17:48, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:48, 22 September 2021

Hugh of Austrasia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I believe that this article should be deleted due to the nature of this article being sourced by nothing but unsourced genealogical entries on findagrave. In fact, if you search on Google for Hugh of Austrasia, all of the first page is nothing but unsourced genealogical sources, or the Wikipedia article.

I have actually heard of Hugh before, while doing genealogical research. I came across it on a very poorly sourced megatree and I have a feeling that either, this dude isn't real, or he is unverifiable.

Setting a Google search parameter for anytime before Dec 31 of 2015, shows no results for me on Hugh whatsoever, except for a WordPress, and a few other sources that don't provide any sources, and seem to be merely lists or previously stated genealogical sites. I think that someone needs to show me a scholarly article or source mentioning Hugh, or else this article should be deleted, perhaps along with some other Austrasian Kings.

EytanMelech (talk) 20:40, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]