Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 April 24: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Fix multiple : lint error.
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)
 
Line 34: Line 34:


:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|20px]] '''Article cleaned''' by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}} --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 15:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|20px]] '''Article cleaned''' by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}} --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 15:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
*[[Depth in a well]] <span class="plainlinks">([{{fullurl:Depth in a well|action=history}} history] · [{{fullurl:Depth in a well|diff=0}} last edit])</span> from [http://www.feswa.org/PPPEDIA/Depth_specification.htm The specification of depths]. WP user [[User:Meranti|Meranti]]&nbsp;{{toolbar|separator=dot|[[User talk:Meranti|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Meranti|contribs]] }} [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Depth_in_a_well&diff=next&oldid=141180766 stated] that he was authorized to release the article under the GFDL (no version specified), but there's neither a link to an OTRS ticket on the [[Talk:Depth in a well|talk page]], or a supporting attribution on the web page. With verification that the GFDL release is valid, it should be usable, but I figured that I should list it here to get a second opinion on whether the talk page comment was sufficient. See also [[Driller's depth]] <span class="plainlinks">([{{fullurl:Driller's depth|action=history}} history] · [{{fullurl:Driller's depth|diff=0}} last edit])</span>; apparently from same source. <font style="font-family:Constantia" size="3" color="#0077bb">[[User:TheFeds|'''''TheFeds''''']]</font> 20:14, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
*[[Depth in a well]] <span class="plainlinks">([{{fullurl:Depth in a well|action=history}} history] · [{{fullurl:Depth in a well|diff=0}} last edit])</span> from [http://www.feswa.org/PPPEDIA/Depth_specification.htm The specification of depths]. WP user [[User:Meranti|Meranti]]&nbsp;{{toolbar|separator=dot|[[User talk:Meranti|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Meranti|contribs]] }} [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Depth_in_a_well&diff=next&oldid=141180766 stated] that he was authorized to release the article under the GFDL (no version specified), but there's neither a link to an OTRS ticket on the [[Talk:Depth in a well|talk page]], or a supporting attribution on the web page. With verification that the GFDL release is valid, it should be usable, but I figured that I should list it here to get a second opinion on whether the talk page comment was sufficient. See also [[Driller's depth]] <span class="plainlinks">([{{fullurl:Driller's depth|action=history}} history] · [{{fullurl:Driller's depth|diff=0}} last edit])</span>; apparently from same source. [[User:TheFeds|<b style="font-family:Constantia; font-size:medium; color:#0077bb;">''TheFeds''</b>]] 20:14, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
:*{{y}} This is a problem, yes. We need verification. I've tagged the images and removed the content I see duplicated at [[Depth in a well]]. I'm now off to look at [[Driller's depth]]. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 23:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
:*{{y}} This is a problem, yes. We need verification. I've tagged the images and removed the content I see duplicated at [[Depth in a well]]. I'm now off to look at [[Driller's depth]]. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 23:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
::*I'm not seeing duplicated text in [[Driller's depth]]. If I'm overlooking it, please blank the article and relist it. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 23:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
::*I'm not seeing duplicated text in [[Driller's depth]]. If I'm overlooking it, please blank the article and relist it. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 23:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
:::*I think you're right about [[Driller's depth]]; I just had another look at the FESWA website (source of the other article), and can't find duplication. (I'd assumed that because he was transferring one article, the other was also transferred...but it looks like this one is OK from a copyright perspective.) <font style="font-family:Constantia" size="3" color="#0077bb">[[User:TheFeds|'''''TheFeds''''']]</font> 01:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
:::*I think you're right about [[Driller's depth]]; I just had another look at the FESWA website (source of the other article), and can't find duplication. (I'd assumed that because he was transferring one article, the other was also transferred...but it looks like this one is OK from a copyright perspective.) [[User:TheFeds|<b style="font-family:Constantia; font-size:medium; color:#0077bb;">''TheFeds''</b>]] 01:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)


* [[:Warren Goodhind]] <span class="plainlinks">([{{fullurl::Warren Goodhind|action=history}} history] · [{{fullurl::Warren Goodhind|diff=0}} last edit])</span> from http://jozefmontigue.tripod.com/w_goodhind.html. [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 01:17, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
* [[:Warren Goodhind]] <span class="plainlinks">([{{fullurl::Warren Goodhind|action=history}} history] · [{{fullurl::Warren Goodhind|diff=0}} last edit])</span> from http://jozefmontigue.tripod.com/w_goodhind.html. [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 01:17, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:15, 6 October 2021

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-04-24 Edit

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
[edit]
  • I'm afraid that we need to replace the whole thing, since Paterson wrote almost all of it and copying is confirmed in substantial part. :/ I'm relisting the article in the hopes that somebody else will do it, but if there's no new text proposed when this comes current I'll do it myself. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:52, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. While the contributor is almost certainly editing on behalf of the subject, content from the earliest edit duplicated that of the external site (though less clearly than later). I've replaced it with a stub. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think you're right about Driller's depth; I just had another look at the FESWA website (source of the other article), and can't find duplication. (I'd assumed that because he was transferring one article, the other was also transferred...but it looks like this one is OK from a copyright perspective.) TheFeds 01:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]