Jump to content

The Pruitt-Igoe Myth: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: work. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:2011 films | #UCB_Category 2266/2945
Changed
Tag: Reverted
Line 20: Line 20:
The documentary argues that the violent social collapse within the Pruitt-Igoe complex was not due to the demographic composition of its residents,<ref name="economist1"/> but was a result of wider, [[white flight|external social]] forces, namely the declining economic fortunes of St. Louis, the resulting impact upon employment opportunities, and the project's failure to meet occupancy projections from the start and therefore to meet monthly income projected to cover maintenance costs. Furnaces made to incinerate garbage failed, pipes/plumbing failed, and more issues kept on to the point residents stopped paying rent. <ref name="economist1"/>
The documentary argues that the violent social collapse within the Pruitt-Igoe complex was not due to the demographic composition of its residents,<ref name="economist1"/> but was a result of wider, [[white flight|external social]] forces, namely the declining economic fortunes of St. Louis, the resulting impact upon employment opportunities, and the project's failure to meet occupancy projections from the start and therefore to meet monthly income projected to cover maintenance costs. Furnaces made to incinerate garbage failed, pipes/plumbing failed, and more issues kept on to the point residents stopped paying rent. <ref name="economist1"/>


Kutfilm
== Plot ==

The film begins with a former resident of the [[Pruitt–Igoe]] public housing complex returning to the site of the buildings in the north side of [[St. Louis, Missouri|St. Louis]], and noting that in spite of the decades since the planned demolition of the buildings, the site remains largely vacant. It continues by detailing the decision by the city to replace 19th century [[tenement]] housing with high-rise [[public housing]], ultimately designed by [[Minoru Yamasaki]] (later the famed designer of the [[World Trade Center (1973–2001)|World Trade Center]]) in the [[modernism|modernist]] style as thirty-three 11-floor buildings.<ref name=nytimes1>
{{cite web
| author= Michael Kimmelman
| title= Towers of Dreams: One Ended in Nightmare
| work= The New York Times
| date= 2012-01-25
| url= https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/arts/design/penn-south-and-pruitt-igoe-starkly-different-housing-plans.html
| accessdate= 2013-07-06
}}
</ref>

Interviews with former residents, archival images, and film are used to tell first impressions about moving into Pruitt-Igoe and the steady deterioration of living conditions during the 1960s and early 1970s before the destruction by [[Building implosion|planned implosion]] between 1972 and 1976.<ref name=nytimes1/><ref name=economist1>
{{cite web
| author= Prospero Books, arts and culture
| title= American public housing: Why the Pruitt-Igoe housing project failed
| publisher= The Economist
| date= 2011-10-15
| url= https://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2011/10/american-public-housing
| accessdate= 2013-07-06
}}
</ref>

The film takes issue with the various explanations for the failure of the Pruitt-Igoe complex that have developed since its demolition, including that it was the fault of the modernist theory of architecture itself (an explanation developed by architectural historian [[Charles Jencks]]<ref>
{{cite book
| last= Jencks
| first= Charles
| authorlink= Charles Jencks
| title= The Language of Post-Modern Architecture
| year= 1984
| publisher= Rizzoli
| location= New York
| isbn= 978-0-8478-0571-6
| page= 9
}}
</ref>)
or of the general concept of public housing.

Instead, the explanation offered is that the fate of the Pruitt-Igoe project was determined by the declining population and industrial base in St. Louis after [[World War II]].<ref>
{{cite web
| author= Newgeography.com
| title= Shrinking City, Flourishing Region: St. Louis Region
| publisher= Newgeography.com
| date= 2011-01-27
| url= http://www.newgeography.com/content/002013-shrinking-city-flourishing-region-st-louis-region
| accessdate= 2013-07-06
}}
</ref>
The documentary argues that this process left few jobs for the remaining residents, thus reducing funds available for maintenance and security of the buildings,<ref name=economist1/> which were planned to be paid for by tenant rents even as residents grew poorer and the living conditions in the project deteriorated.<ref>
{{cite web
| author= Rachel Saltz
| title= A Renewal of Urban History
| work= The New York Times
| date= 2012-01-19
| url= https://movies.nytimes.com/2012/01/20/movies/the-pruitt-igoe-myth-by-chad-freidrichs-review.html
| accessdate= 2013-07-06
}}
</ref>


==Reception==
==Reception==

Revision as of 09:16, 7 October 2021

The Pruitt-Igoe Myth: An Urban History
Directed byChad Freidrichs
Written byChad Freidrichs,
Jaime Freidrichs
Produced byPaul Fehler,
Chad Freidrichs,
Jaime Freidrichs,
Brian Woodman
Release date
  • February 11, 2011 (2011-02-11) (Oxford Film Festival)
Running time
79 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Box office$44,683[1]

The Pruitt-Igoe Myth is a 2011 documentary film detailing the history of the Pruitt–Igoe public housing complex in St. Louis, Missouri, and the eventual decision to raze the entire complex in 1976.

The documentary argues that the violent social collapse within the Pruitt-Igoe complex was not due to the demographic composition of its residents,[2] but was a result of wider, external social forces, namely the declining economic fortunes of St. Louis, the resulting impact upon employment opportunities, and the project's failure to meet occupancy projections from the start and therefore to meet monthly income projected to cover maintenance costs. Furnaces made to incinerate garbage failed, pipes/plumbing failed, and more issues kept on to the point residents stopped paying rent. [2]

Kutfilm

Reception

The Pruitt-Igoe Myth has a rating of 89% on Rotten Tomatoes[3] based on 19 reviews, and a rating of 70 (out of 100) on Metacritic based on 8 reviews.[4] It was nominated for a Satellite Award in 2012 in the category of Best Documentary Film. It also won the International Documentary Association's ABC News VideoSource Award for best use of archival footage.

See also

References

  1. ^ "The Pruitt-Igoe Myth". IMDb. 2011. Retrieved 2013-07-06.
  2. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference economist1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ "The Pruitt-igoe Myth: An Urban History". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 2013-07-06.
  4. ^ "The Pruitt-Igoe Myth Reviews". Metacritic. 2012-01-20. Retrieved 2013-07-06.