Talk:Tai Noi script: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
→Naming: new section |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
{{ping|Glennznl}} What are the writing system's diacritics like? --[[User:Apisite|Apisite]] ([[User talk:Apisite|talk]]) 21:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC) |
{{ping|Glennznl}} What are the writing system's diacritics like? --[[User:Apisite|Apisite]] ([[User talk:Apisite|talk]]) 21:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
:{{re|Apisite}} The most complete overview I have found is [http://www.eki.ee/isotc46wg3/wd20674rev1.pdf this one on page 9]. The script is not yet standardized and not yet encoded in Unicode, so hopefully in the future a full and proper inventory of all diacritics could be displayed on the page. --[[User:Glennznl|Glennznl]] ([[User talk:Glennznl|talk]]) 21:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC) |
:{{re|Apisite}} The most complete overview I have found is [http://www.eki.ee/isotc46wg3/wd20674rev1.pdf this one on page 9]. The script is not yet standardized and not yet encoded in Unicode, so hopefully in the future a full and proper inventory of all diacritics could be displayed on the page. --[[User:Glennznl|Glennznl]] ([[User talk:Glennznl|talk]]) 21:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Naming == |
|||
“Tai Noi” is pejorative, even though it is commonly used, rather than regurgitating an implicit bias that implies there is a “standard” I think the article should be “Lao Buhan” and note that “Tai Noi” is an alternative. There is sufficient literature on the use of “Tai” and the politicization of Thai historiography and linguistics to change the title.--[[User:StampyElephant|StampyElephant]] ([[User talk:StampyElephant|talk]]) 19:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:47, 15 October 2021
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Diacritics
@Glennznl: What are the writing system's diacritics like? --Apisite (talk) 21:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Apisite: The most complete overview I have found is this one on page 9. The script is not yet standardized and not yet encoded in Unicode, so hopefully in the future a full and proper inventory of all diacritics could be displayed on the page. --Glennznl (talk) 21:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Naming
“Tai Noi” is pejorative, even though it is commonly used, rather than regurgitating an implicit bias that implies there is a “standard” I think the article should be “Lao Buhan” and note that “Tai Noi” is an alternative. There is sufficient literature on the use of “Tai” and the politicization of Thai historiography and linguistics to change the title.--StampyElephant (talk) 19:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Writing system articles
- Low-importance Writing system articles
- C-Class Southeast Asia articles
- Low-importance Southeast Asia articles
- C-Class Laos articles
- Unknown-importance Laos articles
- Laos work group articles
- WikiProject Southeast Asia articles
- C-Class Thailand articles
- Low-importance Thailand articles
- WikiProject Thailand articles