Talk:List of Neanderthal sites: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:57, 17 October 2021

Lists List‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
List	This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Primates List‑class Low‑importance

	Primates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Locations?

Are these links supposed to point to discussion of the sites, or to the general area where finds were located? Kortoso (talk) 18:42, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to straighten out this list of links; it's apparent that this was copied from somewhere else.

It may make more sense to have a proper table. And categories of "protoneanderthal" and the like, these are not defined anywhere that I can see. I'd rather associated them with estimated dates and culture, since these are more available and possibly more meaningful.

Thoughts? Kortoso (talk) 20:42, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

1. The designations Classic Neanderthals, Protoneanderthals, and Transition Neanderthals are unreferenced and undefined. Classic Neanderthal refers primarily to a set of traits used by paleoanthropoligists as part of a checklist to determine whether a fossil is Neanderthal. Some fossil are indeed labeled "classic Neanderthal" so maybe this one could stay. I think Transition is an obsolete term from the mid-20th century. Protoneanderthal is not widely used.

2. It would be nice if we had something about which sites have yielded DNA. Some of the details we could include: complete genome, partial, complete mtDNA, etc. Og course this could go in the fossil list, so I'm not sure.

3. The two maps we have now don't show some of the most important site further east, e.g., Uzberkistan, Altai Mountains This one doesn't show specific sites, but is more complete: File:Range of Neanderthals in the Levant.png.

Zyxwv99 (talk) 01:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Carte Neandertaliens.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Bruniquel Cave ?

I've added Bruniquel Cave to this list. Bjohas (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 * [[commons:File:Carte Neandertaliens.jpg|Carte Neandertaliens.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-09-05T20:18:36.496460 | Carte Neandertaliens.jpg -->
 Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carte Neandertaliens.jpg|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 20:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
+== Adding Bruniquel Cave ? ==
+I've added [[Bruniquel Cave]] to this list. [[User:Bjohas|Bjohas]] ([[User talk:Bjohas|talk]]) 15:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)