User talk:Haronte: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:08, 31 October 2021

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Haronte! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! -- Missionedit (talk • contribs) 18:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft

Hey, I noticed that you submitted a draft to articles for creation, but your draft appeared to be intended as a personal user page and not as an encyclopedia article. As such, I have moved it to User:Haronte. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 22:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alupe University College (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Alupe University College may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 12:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Haronte! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 12:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alupe University College (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The lede has no context and doesn't contain the right kind of information, so that the reader knows what is being spoken about. Where is Busia???

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alupe University College and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alupe University College, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 00:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alupe University College

Hello, Haronte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alupe University College, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re Edited Alupe University College article and added additional context and citation

the article Alupe University college is currently under review, i did some re editing and defined all missing context.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alupe University College (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The school's website is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alupe University College and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alupe University College, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alupe University College (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only two references were added since last decline, both of which do not show how the subject meets notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alupe University College and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alupe University College, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 21:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some guidance

Hi Haronte, it is clear you are trying and are taking advise without really understanding Wikipedia, which is understandable because it is a lot to learn. Ideally an article would not have sources attributed to the subject at all, in this case Alupe University College, unless it is for very basic facts such as where they are located, motto, mascot, etc. What reviewers are looking for are three sources independent of the college that have written about it in-depth. I suggest removing most of the material that is only sourced to the college and relying mostly on the secondary sources for content. If there are not enough secondary sources to be able to write an article, then it is a good indication an article is not possible. If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 22:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reviwing Alupe University College Article

considering the mention of secondary sources, i am revieiwing the article with independent and secondary sources with no affiliations to the article in question.

@@ Line 106: / Line 106: @@
 Hi Haronte, it is clear you are trying and are taking advise without really understanding Wikipedia, which is understandable because it is a lot to learn.  Ideally an article would not have sources attributed to the subject at all, in this case Alupe University College, unless it is for very basic facts such as where they are located, motto, mascot, etc. What reviewers are looking for are three sources independent of the college that have written about it in-depth.  I suggest removing most of the material that is only sourced to the college and relying mostly on the secondary sources for content.  If there are not enough secondary sources to be able to write an article, then it is a good indication an article is not possible.  If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the [[WP:Teahouse|Teahouse]]. [[User:S0091|S0091]] ([[User talk:S0091|talk]]) 22:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
+== Reviwing Alupe University College Article ==
+considering the mention of secondary sources, i am revieiwing the article with independent and secondary sources with no affiliations to the article in question.