User talk:Surge elec

Hello, Surge elec, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 21:06, 21 May 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

MIB3

Hi, Surge, and welcome to Wikipedia. You're absolutely correct: I looked too quickly and only saw the headline that was making a prediction. I didn't see the sentence it was referencing. Good call, and my sincere apologies. Happens to the best of us! With humble regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

No problem at all, mistakes happen by everyone. Thank you Surge_Elec (talk) 21:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

The Avengers (2012 film)

This is a neutral notice of an edit-war occurring at The Avengers (2012 film) --Tenebrae (talk) 13:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I have little contusion. Do you mean to say I am engaged in an edit war with someone? If yes, please tell me how, because I am just updating the Box Office amount on the article, nothing else. Thanks Surge_Elec (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

No, no, I was just contacting all of the five most recent editors of the article to let them know of something of concern that was occurring at an article on which they were involved. It's one way we communicate with each other and work as a community of collaborators to build articles together.

And thank you for updating my template. I knew my 7th year on Wikipedia was coming up soon! With regards, Tenebrae (talk) 12:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Oh ok, that's what. Thanks for letting me know. And you're welcome for the template update. Happy wiki-birthday to you, regards Surge_Elec (talk) 13:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Service award

Thanks It appears as though you're slightly mistaken: the Vanguard Editor award requires 16 years of editing and Wikipedia has only existed for 11. I wasn't in the first generation of editors, but I've been using the site since 2003 and editing since 2004, so I might be eligible for Master Editor III depending on the date of my first IP edit, which is the second highest that one can presently have. Thanks for your interest, though. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:07, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry for that mistake. But, I would like to present you the service award of the editor you are right now. There is just one thing. You said that you have been editing since 2003 (which I totally trust), and so you might be a Master Editor III. However when I checked your edit count on Wikipedia "Global User Manager", it says you registered on May 2008. But your edit count shows correct: 1.12 million. So do you think that there is the possibly of an error somewhere? Surge_Elec (talk) 13:35, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar!

		The WikiProject Film Award
		I, Evanh2008 (talk|contribs), hereby award Surge elec the WikiProject Film Award for his/her valued contributions to WikiProject Film. For keeping our information on box office returns up to date! Awarded 07:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Cameron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Ribbon Award (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:36, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

>> I have pointed that link to the appropriate page. Thank you so much letting me know this. Surge_Elec (talk) 06:59, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Retired?

Surge, why are you retiring? Or would you rather not say? Flyer22 (talk) 19:00, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

My retirement was because I am employed now, and I have work for 10 hours minimum daily. Unfortunately now I cannot find enough time to be able to make edits to Wikipedia anymore. Earlier on, I used to have 2 or 3 hours free everyday, in which I made edits to Wikipedia. Thank you for asking. Surge_Elec (talk) 08:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Oh, okay. I hope you can find the time to edit here again. And if you do find the time to edit here sporadically, you should go ahead and remove that retirement tag. In the meantime, you'll be missed. Flyer22 (talk) 23:28, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

You are more open than I am, that's all I can say. Yes, I have removed the retired tag from my pages. I'll make edits whenever I can to Wikipedia. Surge_Elec (talk) 07:09, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

I was sorry to see you retire too Surge. That said the box office doesn't need to be updated on a daily basis, once a week is enough really if you have less free time but still wish to edit. Congratulations on the job anyway, and good luck with it. Betty Logan (talk) 07:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your good wishes Betty. Really appreciate it. Surge_Elec (talk) 12:17, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for tirelessly keeping the Box office figures of films up-to-date, in many different articles. 3 Wise Men (talk) 10:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for your tireless contributions to James Cameron. You having done all that alone, I know how much effort it must have taken. 3 Wise Men (talk) 10:33, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your significant contributions that helped promote The Avengers (2012 film) to good article status.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:03, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of accolades received by Zero Dark Thirty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Clarke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Main Page appearance

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the article List of highest-grossing films know that it will be appearing as the main page featured list on February 25, 2013. You can view the TFL blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured list/February 25, 2013. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) or Giants2008 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. Thanks! Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:50, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Traditionally, the highest-grossing films have been war films, musicals and historical dramas, but franchise films have been the best performers in the 21st century, especially the Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings and Pirates of the Caribbean series. The only films in the top ten that do not form a franchise are the top two, Avatar and Titanic, both directed by James Cameron. Disney has enjoyed success with its Pixar brand, of which the Toy Story films have been the best performers. James Bond, Star Wars, and Indiana Jones are still among the highest-grossing franchises, despite starting over thirty years ago. Gone with the Wind (poster pictured) was the highest-grossing film for 25 years and, adjusting for inflation, would remain so.

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bhanu Athaiya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

A question

Surge, the issue with the supporter has nothing to do with you or whether the list will be promoted. The user who supported was not basing his support on the list meeting FL criteria, but on the perceived importance of the topic. This is not a valid reason for putting a star on a page, and Chris was trying to highlight that for the benefit of myself and the other featured list directors. Now we can take that into account when making promotion/archiving decisions. There's nothing you have to fix, and the list can still be promoted if other reviewers think it is worthy. In short, don't worry about the situation too much. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Ok, that's what. Thank you for your reply. Surge_Elec (talk) 04:55, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your significant contributions that helped promote List of Academy Awards for Walt Disney to featured list status.-- TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks...

Just wanted to thank you for the barnstar. It's nice to receive some recognition every once in a while, as I'm sure you understand. Hopefully we at FLC will see more of your work in the future. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Your welcome :-) Surge_Elec (talk) 10:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Indian films nominated for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film

The article List of Indian films nominated for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We have an article on List of Indian submissions for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. Till date only three films were nominated and I don't think a separate list is needed for those three films.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 14:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Indian films nominated for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Indian films nominated for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian films nominated for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 03:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Red Blooded American

The article Red Blooded American has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 16:52, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

I have added about the involvement of Warner Bros and Jay Roach in the film. But there aren't anymore details about the film right now. If these details are not sufficient, then you can delete the page.Surge_Elec (talk) 05:54, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

I just added some references. Surge_Elec (talk) 06:15, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yeh Hai Aashiqui

The article Yeh Hai Aashiqui has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and Incomplete article. This article have one primary source in Infobox, which is channel's official website, Not this TV show

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. :-ChanderForYou 11:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 19 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Lance Armstrong page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lance Armstrong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of accolades received by Star Wars film series

Hello Surge elec,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of accolades received by Star Wars film series for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:34, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Milkha Singh

Hi, you recently added medals to the infobox of the Milkha Singh article. They were displaying but now they are not and I cannot work out what has gone on. Probably one of the IPs who has been editing has changed something. Could you check it out please? - Sitush (talk) 16:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

They're visible now :-) Surge_Elec (talk) 12:33, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks very much. - Sitush (talk) 13:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of The Race of My Life for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Race of My Life is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Race of My Life until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:34, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Cycling's Greatest Fraud for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cycling's Greatest Fraud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cycling's Greatest Fraud until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Relentlessly (talk) 18:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Surge elec. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Surge elec. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Academy Awards for Walt Disney – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 25. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Surge elec. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Update avengers infinity war box office collection

Sir plz update china collection it will 2nd highest grosser in China plz highlight this Gunjan surti (talk) 17:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

I appreciate the Barnstar, cheers! SassyCollins (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

This Cutie will be your companion of spreading WP:Wikilove. thanks for the kind wishes.

DBigXray 19:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thank you for the barnstar! Cheers! -- TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Surge elec. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

MTV Roadies (season 16) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, MTV Roadies (season 16), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AD ^Talk 18:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:MTV Roadies (season 16)

Hello, Surge elec. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MTV Roadies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Interstellarity T 🌟 14:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Decade 2020

God bless all the editors of Wikipedia. Surge_Elec (talk) 18:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. I didn't post here when I deleted because I saw the "Retired" message. I deleted your article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the subject's organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing the author or publisher. Since the book is "upcoming" it can't meet the notability criteria, so what we have is an article sourced only to an affiliated website which consists of a plot summary and a a notification of when we can buy it; it's basically a publisher's blurb, whatever the intent, and therefore advertising. At best it's too soon since your text would need to have independent third-party sources to show how it meets our notability criteria, and that can't happen until it's out. For now, you could make the article a redirect, #Redirect [[Diary of a Wimpy Kid (book series)]] ⋅ Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:17, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Special Barnstar...?

Hi! You awarded me a special barnstar, saying that I had promoted List of accolades received by Avengers: Endgame to FL status. I know you deleted it later saying that the barnstar was not accepted by some people. I was just wondering, why did you think that I promoted the article? As of now, it is not an FL. Also, what is meant by "not accepted by some people"? Is the awarding of barnstars being monitored?
(P.S. I am relatively new here — I don't have much experience on Wikipedia.)
Thank you! ☺ -Caleb KG (talk) 12:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

I had given barnstars to the users who made at least one edit to the list. However, two users refused to accept it. I am thinking that, once it is promoted to FL, maybe I can just post "Thank you." to everybody. Perhaps, people won't have any issues with that. Surge_Elec (talk) 13:42, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Oh...OK 👍 -Caleb KG (talk) 09:49, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you

To all the users who made at least one edit to List of accolades received by Avengers: Endgame.

List of accolades received by Avengers: Endgame is going to achieve Featured List status, soon.

Facu-el Millo ChrisTheDude Diddi2002 Favre1fan93 District9123 Minorax Brojam Haileesama 2pou CAPTAIN_MEDUSA Caleb_KG TMProofreader WakandaForever188 SibTower1987 Nyook JJMC89 Lepricavark Materialscientist Mr._Vernon Davemck Thaya_Catacora Xyda13 Magitroopa Katya0133 BowserMew Spanneraol Dark_Lord_of_Realm_616 Rosguill Kylo_Driver Isaidnoway Premeditated_Chaos

Surge_Elec (talk) 13:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Avengers: Endgame/archive1

I've reviewed this nomination. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by 1917 (2019 film)/archive1

Hi there,

I was wondering if you could proofread List of accolades received by 1917 (2019 film) for featured list promotion.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 08:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

:@Birdienest81: Do you mean review and give my inputs? Surge_Elec (talk) 14:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

:@Surge elec: Yes, if possible.--Birdienest81 (talk) 17:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Experienced Editor

After 8 years, today I am an Experienced Editor.

Retired

Retired. Farewell. God bless all the editors of Wikipedia.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

TFL notification – January 2021

Hi, Surge elec. I'm just posting to let you know that List of accolades received by Avengers: Endgame – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 18. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for correcting sources

It's very helpful. Please would you consider tagging them as minor edits so they do not appear in the watchlists of editors who filter minor edits out? Cheers. soibangla (talk) 14:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Yes, am tagging them as minor edits now. Thanks. Surge_Elec (talk) 14:08, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Links in cites do not help.Slatersteven (talk) 11:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Well, in featured lists, they are linked. Surge_Elec (talk) 11:15, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

If possible, you should try to combine the edits into as few as possible, to reduce watchlist strain. Good improvements though, thank you. — Goszei (talk) 07:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Ok, let me think how to do this. Surge_Elec (talk) 23:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Disruptive Editing on 2021 in film by Stan Lee 3000

There is this Indian editor who keeps disruptive editing on the article by removing sourced material and misplace false information.

His movie had a mere $40 million that is not even worth mentioning and he keeps reverting it and removing references.

2021 in film

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=2021_in_film&action=history

--74.119.196.50 (talk) 12:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

You can discuss about it and give your inputs on the talkpage. Surge_Elec (talk) 13:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Got it sir.

I will do that and please keep an eye on the page if "Stan Lee 3000" comes back. He is an indian with a English name. Don't know why and he has the 3000, maybe he used this name many times?

--74.119.196.50 (talk) 12:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)